The Supreme Court just ruled that the government can TAKE YOUR HOME
and hand it over to a commercial developer based on NOTHING MORE than
the claim that it can generate more tax revenue as commercial property
(Kelo v. New London). Maybe Dave will come out of hiding and make up
some excuses to defend this latest example of his neocon fascism.





----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...

The Supreme Court just ruled that the government can TAKE YOUR HOME
and hand it over to a commercial developer based on NOTHING MORE than
the claim that it can generate more tax revenue as commercial property
(Kelo v. New London). Maybe Dave will come out of hiding and make up
some excuses to defend this latest example of his neocon fascism.



Hello, Frank

I'm not at all surprised. They should remove folks' homes; after all, they
might find the missing weapons of mass destruction.

Better give some bigger tax breaks on SUVs. Notice how cheap gasoline has
been getting?

I see one or two generals have been making some noise. Better can them as
Rumsfield says everything is just dandy "over there".



Best regards from Rochester, NY
Jim

Jim Hampton wrote:
"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...

The Supreme Court just ruled that the government can TAKE YOUR HOME
and hand it over to a commercial developer based on NOTHING MORE than
the claim that it can generate more tax revenue as commercial property
(Kelo v. New London). Maybe Dave will come out of hiding and make up
some excuses to defend this latest example of his neocon fascism.



Hello, Frank

I'm not at all surprised. They should remove folks' homes; after all, th=
ey
might find the missing weapons of mass destruction.

Better give some bigger tax breaks on SUVs. Notice how cheap gasoline has
been getting?

I see one or two generals have been making some noise. Better can them as
Rumsfield says everything is just dandy "over there".



Best regards from Rochester, NY
Jim
So, Bush appointed these people who came out with this (IMHO stupid)
opinion?

From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
The Supreme Court just ruled that the

government can TAKE YOUR HOME and

hand it over to a commercial developer based

on NOTHING MORE than the claim that it can
generate more tax revenue as commercial

property (Kelo v. New London).


Ain't that a bitch? I was totally surprised by the manner in which the
justices rendered their opinions, especially the way they voted.


Maybe Dave will come out of hiding and make
up some excuses to defend this latest

example of his neocon fascism.



I think it's vacation time for Dave or he was advised to take it ez.


----=3D=3D Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News=3D=3D---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the
World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----=3D East and West-Coast Server Farms -
Total Privacy via Encryption =3D----

"Jim Hampton" wrote:
"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...

The Supreme Court just ruled that the government can TAKE YOUR HOME
and hand it over to a commercial developer based on NOTHING MORE than
the claim that it can generate more tax revenue as commercial property
(Kelo v. New London). Maybe Dave will come out of hiding and make up
some excuses to defend this latest example of his neocon fascism.



Hello, Frank

I'm not at all surprised. They should remove folks' homes; after all,
they might find the missing weapons of mass destruction.

Hello Jim.

You are hooked on that WMD stuff, no doubt. Me, I won't wait for youin's to
deploy such a critter. I'll eat your lunch and slap you for thinking about
such nonsense. Good to know that the silent majority still rules when it
comes to such things. :P

On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:03:38 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in
:

From: (Frank*Gilliland)
The Supreme Court just ruled that the

government can TAKE YOUR HOME and

hand it over to a commercial developer based

on NOTHING MORE than the claim that it can
generate more tax revenue as commercial

property (Kelo v. New London).


Ain't that a bitch? I was totally surprised by the manner in which the
justices rendered their opinions, especially the way they voted.


Totally partisan. So much for seperation of powers.


Maybe Dave will come out of hiding and make
up some excuses to defend this latest

example of his neocon fascism.



I think it's vacation time for Dave or he was advised to take it ez.


Or maybe he's out "engineering" like he does every weekend.....LOL!








----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 01:04:40 GMT, "Jim Hampton"
wrote in :

snip
I see one or two generals have been making some noise. Better can them as
Rumsfield says everything is just dandy "over there".


Hey, I saw that, too! The first thing that popped into my mind was,
"How long till Rumsfeld plonks -these- guys?"

BTW, I've been waiting to see that Frontline episode about Rove but I
don't think they aired it here in Conservativeville. Fortunately it's
on the net:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl...tc/script.html







----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

"mopathetic didn't camp at Dayton! CHICKEN BOY!"

Going to Finday, dogie? I forbid you from there, mother****er.

On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:03:38 -0400, I AmnotGeorgeBush wrote:

From: (Frank*Gilliland)
The Supreme Court just ruled that the

government can TAKE YOUR HOME and

hand it over to a commercial developer based

on NOTHING MORE than the claim that it can
generate more tax revenue as commercial

property (Kelo v. New London).


Ain't that a bitch? I was totally surprised by the manner in which the
justices rendered their opinions, especially the way they voted.

Yeah, when there's money to be made it don't matter. Case in point was the
"Poletown" deal years ago in Detroit where a whole neighborhood got
bulldozed down to make way for a new GM plant. The argument went that it
would be GM's flagship of efficiency etc. Well it never did live up to its
hype, nor produced the kind of tax revenues the city was hoping to get
either.

Regards,

Leland C. Scott
KC8LDO

"Education is what you get when
you read the fine print. Experience
is what you get when you don't."

"Leland C. Scott" wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:03:38 -0400, I AmnotGeorgeBush wrote:

From: (Frank*Gilliland)
The Supreme Court just ruled that the

government can TAKE YOUR HOME and

hand it over to a commercial developer based

on NOTHING MORE than the claim that it can
generate more tax revenue as commercial

property (Kelo v. New London).


Ain't that a bitch? I was totally surprised by the manner in which the
justices rendered their opinions, especially the way they voted.

Yeah, when there's money to be made it don't matter. Case in point was
the "Poletown" deal years ago in Detroit where a whole neighborhood got
bulldozed down to make way for a new GM plant. The argument went that it
would be GM's flagship of efficiency etc. Well it never did live up to
its hype, nor produced the kind of tax revenues the city was hoping to
get either.

Know anyone that retired from there?