Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 19:20:35 -0400, Cmd Buzz Corey
wrote: +james wrote: + On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 13:54:46 -0400, "Tim" + wrote: + + ++Seeing 50 & 60 year old men paste "ARRL Member" stickers ++all over their cars, then go out on the highway and chase truck ++drivers around to see what frequency they are on, has got to one ++of the most hilarious things anyone has ever seen. ++ ++Tim + + ****** + + Better yet 4 older hams on a 2 meter repeater on a saturday morning + discribing their heart attacks. How long they were in intensive care + and how much mobility they have lost. + + james + +So did anyone hold a gun to you to make you listen? ******* No. I laughed through the whole thing. james |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 22:01:43 -0400, Cmd Buzz Corey
wrote: +Well, if you were listening to something that boring to you, you +probably have enough sense to change to another repeater or turn the +radio off. James evidently can't do that. (I'm posting from my chair). ***** Actually found it boring and funny in a wierd way. I guess at 7:30 am while drinking my coffee, I had nothing better to do myself. james |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
james wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 22:01:43 -0400, Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: +Well, if you were listening to something that boring to you, you +probably have enough sense to change to another repeater or turn the +radio off. James evidently can't do that. (I'm posting from my chair). ***** Actually found it boring and funny in a wierd way. I guess at 7:30 am while drinking my coffee, I had nothing better to do myself. james You must lead a boring life. |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Holford wrote:
One could likewise spend their Amateur Radio $$ on bigger and better things, such as paying good money after bad to join the Ten Ten Club, yet another wasteful expenditure of hard-earned money. Why not start a Twenty-Twenty Club? One could double the dues paid to the Ten Ten Club and claim twice the elitism. The Twenty-Twenty Club could do as the Ten-Tenners do...refuse to speak with those not a member of their snooty group. Double the frequency, double the elitism. Double the 'frequency' ?? What do you expect from a cber? |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() One could likewise spend their Amateur Radio $$ on bigger and better things, such as paying good money after bad to join the Ten Ten Club, yet another wasteful expenditure of hard-earned money. Why not start a Twenty-Twenty Club? One could double the dues paid to the Ten Ten Club and claim twice the elitism. The Twenty-Twenty Club could do as the Ten-Tenners do...refuse to speak with those not a member of their snooty group. Double the frequency, double the elitism. Double the 'frequency' ?? |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Who Needs The ARRL?" JIm@GuessWho wrote The Twenty-Twenty Club could do as the Ten-Tenners do...refuse to speak with those not a member of their snooty group. Double the frequency, double the elitism. Damn, and here I thought that the 20M band was at about half the frequency of the 10M band. Did those rascals at ARRL go and change that too? Where on the dial can I now find my 20M buddies, up in the old 5M band? I thought we'd lost that band way back in the 40's. dit dit de Hans, K0HB |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() John S. wrote: beerbarrel wrote: On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 00:27:25 -0500, "Who Needs The ARRL?" JIm@GuessWho wrote: The ARRL is not a necessary institution these days. It is self-propagating, demands hefty dues and represents less than half of the licensed Amateurs in the United States. Besides, what does one get for the $40.00 per annum (or is it more?) fee? A glossy magazine rife with advertisements? Admission to 'private' sections of the ARRL web site? A monthly 'bulletin' sent to your email address? (more spam) Oh, wait. ARRL members get to vote on proposed rule changes, too. As if the FCC has ever given that much credence. I guess there are still some old warhorses out and about who feel that it is a mark of distinction to have the ARRL logo on their QSL cards...especially those who boast of being part of the elite few, the proud, the Life Members. One could likewise spend their Amateur Radio $$ on bigger and better things, such as paying good money after bad to join the Ten Ten Club, yet another wasteful expenditure of hard-earned money. Why not start a Twenty-Twenty Club? One could double the dues paid to the Ten Ten Club and claim twice the elitism. The Twenty-Twenty Club could do as the Ten-Tenners do...refuse to speak with those not a member of their snooty group. Double the frequency, double the elitism. CQ Contest, anyone? So, what is your stance? Seems like you think they should be done away with? Is that true? What is your recommendation for a replacement? Do you have any solution at all? If you are not a part of the solution then you are part of the problem! I love folks that whine and cry. It is usually what they do best. Break Imperfect though it is, the ARRL is the only voice the ham hobby has these days. It would be a very poor idea to do away with the ARRL without having something better to replace it. The ARRL does need to refocus it's efforts toward attracting newer younger members to the hobby if it is to survive long term. The hobby won't survive if its quasi-regulator continues to do treat amateur radio as though it operates in the heyday that was the 1950's. and it needs to avoid ****ing those folks as it reaches out to them |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have again written to Headquarter regarding their stand on CC&R. I was a
hot issue with them but now nothing but silence on this very important issue for amateurs. "Who Needs The ARRL?" JIm@GuessWho wrote in message ... The ARRL is not a necessary institution these days. It is self-propagating, demands hefty dues and represents less than half of the licensed Amateurs in the United States. Besides, what does one get for the $40.00 per annum (or is it more?) fee? A glossy magazine rife with advertisements? Admission to 'private' sections of the ARRL web site? A monthly 'bulletin' sent to your email address? (more spam) Oh, wait. ARRL members get to vote on proposed rule changes, too. As if the FCC has ever given that much credence. I guess there are still some old warhorses out and about who feel that it is a mark of distinction to have the ARRL logo on their QSL cards...especially those who boast of being part of the elite few, the proud, the Life Members. One could likewise spend their Amateur Radio $$ on bigger and better things, such as paying good money after bad to join the Ten Ten Club, yet another wasteful expenditure of hard-earned money. Why not start a Twenty-Twenty Club? One could double the dues paid to the Ten Ten Club and claim twice the elitism. The Twenty-Twenty Club could do as the Ten-Tenners do...refuse to speak with those not a member of their snooty group. Double the frequency, double the elitism. CQ Contest, anyone? |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 00:27:25 -0500, "Who Needs The ARRL?" JIm@GuessWho wrote:
The ARRL is not a necessary institution these days. It is self-propagating, demands hefty dues and represents less than half of the licensed Amateurs in the United States. Besides, what does one get for the $40.00 per annum (or is it more?) fee? A glossy magazine rife with advertisements? Admission to 'private' sections of the ARRL web site? A monthly 'bulletin' sent to your email address? (more spam) Oh, wait. ARRL members get to vote on proposed rule changes, too. As if the FCC has ever given that much credence. I guess there are still some old warhorses out and about who feel that it is a mark of distinction to have the ARRL logo on their QSL cards...especially those who boast of being part of the elite few, the proud, the Life Members. One could likewise spend their Amateur Radio $$ on bigger and better things, such as paying good money after bad to join the Ten Ten Club, yet another wasteful expenditure of hard-earned money. Why not start a Twenty-Twenty Club? One could double the dues paid to the Ten Ten Club and claim twice the elitism. The Twenty-Twenty Club could do as the Ten-Tenners do...refuse to speak with those not a member of their snooty group. Double the frequency, double the elitism. CQ Contest, anyone? Well, other than reading their website or using their books to pass an exam, I know little about them. But it seems they run the show, and are very powerful. Sometimes, they are better off having 2 of these type organizations. But one is better than none. Vinnie S. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Open Letter to K1MAN | Policy | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #697 | General | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL's Incoming QSL Burro Screwing NON ARRL members! | Policy | |||
ARRL Dilemmas (Representative KC8LDO a problem-operator) | CB |