Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 Jul 2005 19:28:01 -0700, "JArthur"
wrote in .com: If a longer antenna is better then why do they sometimes have to be cut shorter when tuning? Because a longer antenna isn't necessarily better. When you hear that a longer antenna is better it's usually a comparison between lengths of loaded and unloaded antennas of the same -electrical- length. An unloaded CB antenna is 9', it's the longest 1/4-wave you can get, and it's also the most efficent. Shorter antennas (firestiks, wilsons, etc) are still a 1/4-wave long -electrically- but are less efficient because they are shorter -physically-. You tune your antenna to get it into a zone where it's most efficient, where it's as close to a 1/4-wave as possible. That 'zone' is actually pretty wide, and a 2:1 or better SWR across the band is a good indication that you are in that zone; i.e, your antenna is tuned. If you want a more efficient antenna then get one with the same -electrical- length and a greater -physical- length. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ARRL books, etc are 621.384 in Dewey Decimal System.
|
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 Jul 2005 21:53:40 GMT, Steveo wrote:
Vinnie S. wrote: On 11 Jul 2005 19:28:01 -0700, "JArthur" wrote: If a longer antenna is better then why do they sometimes have to be cut shorter when tuning? Because wavelength changes with frequency. The higher the frequency, the shorter the antenna needed. Vinnie S. The lower the freq, the bigger the tree! ![]() I was hoping I got that right. They cut my Firestik very long before I went to the Imax. Vinnie S. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 Jul 2005 19:28:01 -0700, "JArthur"
wrote: +If a longer antenna is better then why do they sometimes have to be cut +shorter when tuning? ******** First off there is physical length and then there is electrtical length. The two can be the same or they can be different. Electrical length is the length that at some frequency the antenna is self resonant. This is found for a half wave antenna by the following formula (299.8 meters / frequency in MHz.)/2 = resonant length of a half wave antenna. Other things can affect tuning of the antenna like nearby buildings, how close the antenna is to the Earth, and many other variables. These variables will alter the above formula from as little as 2% to as much as 10%. There are techniques that can actually shorten the physical length while maintaining proper electrical length. One method is linear loading of an antenna. Another is to introduce some reactance to alter the physcal length while maintaining proper electrtical length. This reactance is often in the form of a coil. This coil can be located pretty much anywhere in the antenna. Coils are generally not reccommended at the far ends of the antenna from the feed point. Ideally one should have an antenna that has the physical and electrical length the same. This is not always possible but the most desirable. Reactances in the antenna alter radiation patterns off the antenna and in most cases reducing overall efficiency of the antenna. Antennas can be somewhat simple to very complex. A good refereence book to pick up would be the ARRL Antenna Handbook. There are many out there that range from introductory to very technical. james |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Question about Sirius Satellite Radio Antenna | Broadcasting | |||
LongWire Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave |