Steveo wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote:
james wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:42:55 -0400, "Anonymous CBer"
wrote:

+The F.C.C. Does Not Exist!
*******

Actually the FCC does exist. Their biggest problem is that they get

well you are both right sorta

the FCC doesn't exist, in pratical term for the reason you mention

It has a few other problems like trying regulate the laws of physics

puting a service like CB intended for local use on HF was plain stupid

What's 'plain stupid' is you craving a mans dick up your ass, ****stick.

plain stupid is making the above stement and pretending it has any
place in civilized society

hth

"an_old_friend" wrote:
Steveo wrote:
What's 'plain stupid' is you craving a mans dick up your ass,
****stick.

plain stupid is making the above stement and pretending it has any
place in civilized society

hth

Don't ask, don't tell. Especially on usenet, fudgepacker.

--
http://NewsReader.Com/

From: (james)
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:42:55 -0400, "Anonymous CBer"
wrote:
+The F.C.C. Does Not Exist!
*******
Actually the FCC does exist. Their biggest problem is that they get the
scraps from the Federal Budget. Your gripe is with the wrong
governmental body. Try complaining to the House and Senate
Telecommunicatons committes. They are ones that oversee the FCC and are
influencial in forming their budget allocations.
Many within the FCC would love to have another ten to twenty million
dollars annualy for enforcement. But right now most of the US taxpayer
money is going to build bombs, bullets and Hummers. Oh and I did forget
the payola of government contracts for the rebuilding of Iraq. Then
again we need to stop blowing the place up before we rebuild it.
james
_
What enforcement allocation the FCC does get, is directed toward
protecting you and I from incredibly dangerous and overt sexual
connotations and profanity. All the enightened (and some not so
enlightened) countries in the world broadcast much more exposure than
the fleeting site of a woman's single breast, but not in this country.
The FCC must protect us from Janet Jackson's tit and the word "****".
I'm telling you, the only thing that makes sense is the current
administration is rampant with blatant homosexuals who actually find a
woman's breast offensive. Add Jeff Gannon to the equation and this
admin's catering to the queers while trying to maintain they are
Christians must be addressed. Smoke and mirrors won't win Bush Iraq. In
fact, his house of cards seems to be falling more each day.