Reply to: =A0=A0 "John Smith" From: =A0=A0
"John Smith" Group: =A0=A0 rec.radio.cb
Subject: =A0=A0 FCC proposes to drop CW requirement on HF
X-Priority: =A0=A0 3 X-MSMail-Priority: =A0=A0 Normal X-RFC2646: =A0=A0
Format=3DFlowed; Original X-Antivirus: =A0=A0 avast! (VPS 0529-2,
07/21/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: =A0=A0 Not-Tested
Date: =A0=A0 Fri, Jul 22, 2005, 4:17pm (EDT-3) X-Complaints-To: =A0=A0
X-Trace: =A0=A0 news.sisna.com 1122074242
66.81.208.166 (Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:17:22 MDT)

From: (John=A0Smith)
Actually, my mother taught me to ignore fools

and not address them at all...

But she didn't teach you -better-. In fact your current struggle is
rooted with this mother
fixation of yours.

...afraid, I ignore her teachings

So you're afraid (shrug). That's no reason to ignore what you were
taught. That you think making insults then commenting on college and a
debate club as if you knew something of the subject is testament you
ignored MANY teachings, not just your mutha's.

and address you at my own peril...

That IS how usenet works. It never ceases to amaze me how some who are
licensed in communications know so little of it. Wait! Yes it does!!

John

Reply to: =A0=A0 "John Smith" From: =A0=A0
"John Smith" Group: =A0=A0 rec.radio.cb
Subject: =A0=A0 FCC proposes to drop CW requirement on HF
X-Priority: =A0=A0 3 X-MSMail-Priority: =A0=A0 Normal X-RFC2646: =A0=A0
Format=3DFlowed; Original X-Antivirus: =A0=A0 avast! (VPS 0529-2,
07/21/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: =A0=A0 Not-Tested
Date: =A0=A0 Fri, Jul 22, 2005, 4:19pm (EDT-3) X-Complaints-To: =A0=A0
X-Trace: =A0=A0 news.sisna.com 1122074404
66.81.208.166 (Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:20:04 MDT)


From: (John=A0Smith)
Either way, I feel your past mental history


There is that double digit IQ that prefers to attack a poster rather
than the topic. Demonstrate a bit more, if you would, this subject of
debate of which you continue embarrass yourself. Tell us more of -your-
college that -you- invoked that taught you such intelligent debate
tactics.

and

frequent confinements to mental institutions


You know nothing of debate, which -was- your original attempted
regurgitation. To think you knew something else is to be expected. To
ask another to believe you know something after such witty examples of
intellect, well, that would be expected of you as well.

and dependence on psychiatric drugs (which

are not working) should be a barrier to you

being issued a license...

John


Frequent confinements? What makes you think I got out? "Either way", if
your communication deficit wasn't roaring its ugly head and using your
ego as its whippin' boy, you would retain what you read in this group.
But you can't, as you have more than demonstrated. No drugs or alcohol
or red meat or tobacco shall corrupt my bodily temple. For daily
guidance and strength, I need only look to your kind quotes and posts
for the instant realization of how gifted and blessed I truly am. By
comparison, of course. Just want to make sure you can continue follow.
..

From: (John=A0Smith)
Anger?

Absolutely. When you introduced personal insult as a means to convey
your feelings, it was a knee-jerk response to feelings of anger or low
self-esteem. Have it your way, it's the latter, then. By the time (if)
you finish this college you felt impotant enough to invoke, you will
learn such things. Insult has no place in debate. Next time, know a
little more of your subject before you slap yourself for other's
benefit.

You fail to see satire and irony when you read

it, you don't recognize "dry humor?"...


Satire is not laced with direct insult, nor is dry humor. Your first
claim that you knew something of debate embarrassed you and you were
pardoned when you demonstrated ignorance arrived by your insult. Fine.
Tits up for you topping that with your incorrect interpretations of
satire and dry humor. Satirists don't directly insult, as they have no
need. They understand the subtle implications of their work and the
generally educated public can correctly infer such from their work. But
you, man, you brilliantly demonstrated not only a most unsound
description, but a through misinterpretation of both satire -and-
debate.

... you really think I take you as anything more

than the silliest of jokes?


That is exactly what you did by attempting to invoke -your- college. You
did so in a most serious attempt, but since you totally embarrassed
yourself with such a failed example, you now wish to claim it a joke.
Agreed. With such an example of debate from you, a joke is what the
educated interpret such as.



Common guy (or girl, or it), sit down the opium
pipe and step away into the light...

John

So out of anger or low self-esteem, you have demonstrated and chosen an
unhealthy preoccupation for speaking of both drugs and this mother
complex you brought to the group. Please try and understand that your
needs can be better met by someone who cares for you.


"I AmnotGeorgeBush" wrote in message
... From:
(John Smith)
Jim:
At my college, the "flames" here wouldn't even
make a pimple on a good debaters A$$.

You know nothing of debate, as your posts
attest. They are made in haste and anger.
Your insults should be left at the door. Of
course, people in college familiar with debate
already know this.

Not to be confused with the actual A$$'s here,

Right on cue. Thank you for the brilliance shared.

John

From: (John=A0Smith)
Yes, I'd say better if you limit your alcohol

intake...

Everyone should limit their alcohol intake but what you say has been
shown to be quite incompetent in both meaning, definition, and
cohesiveness.


Your nature suggests an abusive alcoholic,


Tell ya' what. Since you showed you knew nothing of debate, why don't
you change the subject to yet another, like, hey, I have it,,the poster,
again. Since it was the "poster" that illustrated your incompetence by
pointing out your insults have no place in this skilled debate you tried
but failed to speak of, why don't you attack him/her again. By Jove, and
to think your young mind will one day be part of the generation that
runs this country.
Look, just because I
**** on you like a frequent drunk when you hurl insults, doesn't mean I
actually drink. Again, if you retained what you read, you would know
this already, in addition to knowing debate has no place for insult. In
fact, if you retained what you read, you wouldn't be having such
difficulties with this college -you- mentioned that has you misdefining,
misinterpreting, and repeating erroneoulsly in public what you feel is
"debate". S'cool. Just look to me when you're feeling so bad about
yourself again in the future and I'll set you right every time.

bet the police records in your town of

residence (both past and present) would tell a

story of long term abuse of women and

children...


Is that all you got? Was that your best? May God's hand find you before
you graduate. You need guidance, young angry man.
So far you have mentioned a drug issue, a
mother complex, an alcohol problem, and now, violence against women and
children.
This is really binding you like a disease.

Yes, it does show...

And how.

John

You are just a sawed off wristflipping fairy, twitlips. Better pay
attention to that baby monitor, FUGGLY may need more KY and condoms.

yep, you aint Bush, for sure. A pimple on his ass has more brains.
FUGGLY renting gotten boring or something, wrist flipper?

There is no need to have any test for CW. The use of it will stand or
fall on it's own merits without any artificial boost due to testing
requirements. CW will never die out completely, like classic cars,
somebody will always have an interest in it. Regards,

Leland C. Scott

KC8LDO
_
One may substitute the word "hammie radio" for "CW" in your post and the
validity remains.

(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
From: (John=A0Smith)
Anger?

Absolutely. When you introduced personal insult as a means to convey
your feelings, it was a knee-jerk response to feelings of anger or low
self-esteem.

F the CC. ($1 Steve Earle)

--
http://NewsReader.Com/

On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:25:31 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote:

http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-05-143A1.doc


John



I think the most beneficial part of learning Morse code at 13 wpm or
faster is the pride in the accomplishment. 5 wpm is nothing. It took
me two weeks to go from start to passing my code test, and I don't
even like Morse code. When I passed my 13 wpm test I was proud of my
ham license, because I had to work for it. There is no pride in being
a CB'er, because you don't have to earn it.
I'd like to see the code requirement go back to 13 wpm for HF
access. It separates those that want to be hams from those that just
think they want to be hams.

-Ham since 1986.
-CBer since 1975

When it's all said and done, nothing gets through the air like code.
Nothing.