Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi, I have my I-Max 2000 mounted on a two inch diameter forty two foot pole. Before that I machined the mounting plate off and fitted the A99 ground plane kit. The base of the I-Max is not round, being oval, so I manufactured a sleeve to allow easy installation of the GP kit. I can report it works extremely well on 12m - 10m and is usuable down to 20m with an internal aatu. Beyond that the performance drops away rapidly although it will match ok down to 80m requiring the likes of the SCC aatu to match on 160m. The Shakespere ABS performs a little better on the ham bands, but the I-Max is better on the 12m - CB - 10m segment.
Remember, if you're not worried about it falling down, it's not high enough! Quote:
|
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, the the things you don't always here about. The people still
living in FEMA tailors is news to me. I wonder how many other people out there are having difficulties that most of us are not aware of. I guess human suffering is clear and evident in the land of the free... even to this day! Technology and medicine are allowing us to live longer lives, but how many of us can afford it? For instance, I just got out of the VA hospital Tuesday after a several hour stay in the ER. I was required to call the VA before calling 911 if I wanted my ambulance ride "paid for." As a veteran who was disabled while in the service, I am being well taken care of, but it becomes my responsibility to know the ins and outs of what the VA will and will not pay for, and under what circumstances they will do it in. Luckily, my situation wasn't life and death, but if it had been, calling the VA before calling 911 would be an ethical situation that could result in much debate. Buther Boy On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:59:36 -0400, (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote: From: (Buther*Boy) Interesting point. In regards to Katrina, only 1/3 of the people that were affected by the storm, had flood insurance. 1/3 seems like an interesting figure as well. Do you think that 1/3 is high, low, or right on? I am wondering if the 1/3 of individuals/families that had flood insurance are even going to get paid by the insurance companies; and with that, just who will be eligible for rebuilding money from the govt.? Just some thoughts I've had lately. Buther Boy Interesting is right. Folks on the water HAVE to have flood insurance here in Florida IF they have a mortgage and they are on the water, doesn't matter if it's the ocean, Gulf, river, pond, stream or creek, it's mandatory. Problem is, the ground here is all sand. Once it sponges all it can hold, the water begins to pool. Add a jammed/backed up/overflowing sewage system or few into the mix and suddenly that inland neighborhood that had no bodies of water anywhere near it is indistinguishable from the flooded beaches, bays, tributaries and other water flooded areas. The homes flood. I'd guess the majority of those inland who flooded had no flood insurance. Another way the insurance companies put the screws to us is they have separate wind policies and deductibles. If you don't elect to take the wind coverage (an extra expense, and again, many inland AND even here on the coast do not elect it) and you get your roof blown off, tough! The last straw however, is the scumbags in the insurance industry who still have not paid their policy holders in south Florida from last year's triple dose of hurricanes. There are still plenty of families residing in FEMA provided trailers waiting on their checks from the insurance companies, which leads to the bigger picture of the State Pool Insurance that was created to help those who can't get homeowners or those who are dropped for filing a claim. By default and totally unintentionally, the state backed pool became the single largest insurer in Florida AND the most expensive. They are suffering and have ethical questions and investigations ongoing. Name of the outfit is "Citizen's Insurance" and they are underwritten by the JUA. Google them for some reading into why this state is so screwed up with political hacks and friends of big business and insurance. -- Remove the word Spam from my e-mail to contact me... http://www.PrivacySig.com/SIGbutherb...mail-black.png ~ |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
As it stands, and I am working on it this weekend, it will be mounted
on a 3 foot galvanized pipe that slides inside a 2 foot piece of PVC that is cemented in a 5 gallon bucket. I read about the installation on eham.net. Seems to be legit as far as installations go, but only at wind speeds of 50 miles or less. Good enough for the time being... Buther Boy On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:25:01 +0000, Gerry wrote: Hi, I have my I-Max 2000 mounted on a two inch diameter forty two foot pole. Before that I machined the mounting plate off and fitted the A99 ground plane kit. The base of the I-Max is not round, being oval, so I manufactured a sleeve to allow easy installation of the GP kit. I can report it works extremely well on 12m - 10m and is usuable down to 20m with an internal aatu. Beyond that the performance drops away rapidly although it will match ok down to 80m requiring the likes of the SCC aatu to match on 160m. The Shakespere ABS performs a little better on the ham bands, but the I-Max is better on the 12m - CB - 10m segment. Remember, if you're not worried about it falling down, it's not high enough! Buther Boy Wrote: I have spent quite a bit of time in the last several weeks trying to come up with a solution for talking skip in a town home area. Well, I think I got it figured out... Maybe any way. :-) I ordered the Imax 2000, based on several eham reviews and in particular, the reviews of N0VZ and WB2YIP: http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/1376?page=3 It would seem that I could theoretically get away with installing the Imax 2000 at my town home on PVC piping in a 5 gallon cemented bucket. So there you have it! Buther Boy -- Remove the word Spam from my e-mail to contact me... http://www.PrivacySig.com/SIGbutherb...mail-black.png ~ -- Remove the word Spam from my e-mail to contact me... http://www.PrivacySig.com/SIGbutherb...mail-black.png ~ |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Putting a Ferrite Rod at the Far-End of a Random Wire Antenna ? | Antenna | |||
Putting a Ferrite Rod at the Far-End of a Random Wire Antenna ? | Shortwave | |||
Putting antennas on house chimneys | Antenna | |||
Putting old-wives and baffle-gabbers out of their misery. | Antenna |