Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 29 Oct 2005 03:29:24 -0700, "Gunny Dudly" wrote in
. com: snip proof of comedic ineptitude It would have been a matter of record in an Artcle 15 proceeding, too. Wrong again, Dudly. The proceedings and evidence are not recorded for an Article 15, only the 'crime' and punishment. Wrong. Idiot. Well gee, Dudly, how would you know? Since you are so knowlegable about such things, what page in the SRB holds the transcript of an Article 15 hearing? And for that fact, what page is used to record crimes and punishments? Dumb, Frankie...really, REALLY dumb. Well, maybe you should take that up with the attorney who was appointed to my case and made that recommendation. And all the attorney COULD do was RECOMMEND. YOU were the one who had to make the DECISION, Frankie. Where did I say anything to the contrary? Don't try and slide out from under YOUR mistakes, frankie. I made no mistake, Dudly -- it is -you- who doesn't know squat about the UCMJ. snip "Vindication" only in that you allow yourself that "warm fuzzy" for it. It has no legal bearing. Wrong yet again, Dudly: It had enough "legal bearing" to change the status of my discharge. Perhaps. Fact. But the CONVICTIONS still stand. Yes they do. I seem to recall having said the very same thing several posts ago. Convictions that may keep you from federal contracts and/or security clearances should you need one for contract work in the future. They haven't been a problem so far. My security clearance has never been revoked. I had a job cleaning a bank while working my way through college. I also had a contract a few years ago to design and build a custom security system. I even have a concealed weapons permit. And I have no plans to start a new career in law enforcement. So I guess the only problem is the one you created in your imagination, Dudly. And it was your second OFFENSE..."infractions" are dealt with at Article 15. You, by your own admission, blew that off. More semantics..... gee, I'm devastated. Really. And I mean that. There's no "semantics" to it, Frankie. And I could care less about how "devastated" you are. Your lack of Honor and honesty are "devastating" enough. I haven't been honest about my military service? Hmmmm..... The Marines did the best possible thing with you...sent ya packin'. That might have been true had they not asked me to extend for a West-Pac float with 2nd AAV, but I declined. snip See..that's where we part ways, Frankie...My service never had to be UPGRADED to Honorable...It was that way all along. Uh-huh. Sure thing, Dudly. That's why you claimed to have been discharged for medical reasons, huh? Probably because you are in the early stages of Alzheimer's...... Your lack of grasp of the facts is hillarious. It's in the google archives, written by you, in your own words. If it isn't a fact then you lied. If it -is- a fact then you are lying now. Either way, you just proved once again that you are a liar. snip Yet another snip-job -- too bad you can't address your failures. Poor redirect to others "failures" in order to mitigate your own humiliation. Lame. You're the expert. Steve "Weekend Warrior" Robeson, K4YZ Don't look now but the medals on your uniform are tarnished. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Frankie of Silliland: A Coward Who Lied To And Stole From His Country Lectures About "Integrity" | Policy |