Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"craptosser #3" wrote:
"Vinnie S." wrote in message ... On 26 Oct 2005 13:34:04 -0700, wrote: If Hollingsworth Hey, that guy sounds familiar !!!!!! Vinnie S. Hopefully it will be one of several names that will appear on a future NAL to K1MAN for $20K+ in FCC fines. ("from our mouth to G-d's ear") What's his call? |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:49:07 -0400, "craptosser #3"
wrote: "Vinnie S." wrote in message .. . On 26 Oct 2005 13:34:04 -0700, wrote: If Hollingsworth Hey, that guy sounds familiar !!!!!! Vinnie S. Hopefully it will be one of several names that will appear on a future NAL to K1MAN for $20K+ in FCC fines. ("from our mouth to G-d's ear") Sounds like there are some ego-maniacs at work here. I don't see any reason for most of this other than wanting publicity. I do not know anything about K1MAN, other than the fact he is trying to be the Howard Stern of Ham radio, or that is the way it appears to me. What ever happened to simple plain DXing with other fellow hams? Vinnie S. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: nobodys_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: molested_an_old_friends_son wrote: Hank Oredson wrote: Heard him on 14.275 this morning. -- gald to hear it having provoked this fight with the FCC he needs to finish carry through to the end Most of us ARE galled to hear about Baxter, Markie....He's a skidmark in the shorts of life as far as Amateur Radio goes. you know that statement consideing the source is an endorsement "considering" Only a deviant who think's having another man's excrement on his genitals is "acceptable" would think that. more lying stevie if you can't tell the turth for even a single sentence then I don't even read the rest of your post let alone coment on it |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Vinnie S. wrote: On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:49:07 -0400, "craptosser #3" wrote: "Vinnie S." wrote in message .. . On 26 Oct 2005 13:34:04 -0700, wrote: If Hollingsworth Hey, that guy sounds familiar !!!!!! Vinnie S. Hopefully it will be one of several names that will appear on a future NAL to K1MAN for $20K+ in FCC fines. ("from our mouth to G-d's ear") Sounds like there are some ego-maniacs at work here. I don't see any reason for most of this other than wanting publicity. I do not know anything about K1MAN, other than the fact he is trying to be the Howard Stern of Ham radio, or that is the way it appears to me. that is what some of the postere want you to think at any rate looking past the noise he seems to be an obnoxious fellow who has choosen to test the limits at the FCC. not what I call wise to do so but US law does not require wisdom of its cirizens (thank the gods or else there would be no room in jail and kiley no one to gaurd them) What ever happened to simple plain DXing with other fellow hams? Vinnie S. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Oct 2005 07:31:29 -0700, "an_old_friend" wrote:
Sounds like there are some ego-maniacs at work here. I don't see any reason for most of this other than wanting publicity. I do not know anything about K1MAN, other than the fact he is trying to be the Howard Stern of Ham radio, or that is the way it appears to me. that is what some of the postere want you to think at any rate looking past the noise he seems to be an obnoxious fellow who has choosen to test the limits at the FCC. That is exactly what it appears to me from what I have been reading. He is doing nothing more than being anti-establishment or anti-government. Everyone to his own, I guess. Like I said. I am perfectly happy DXing with other fellow hams, without testing limits or pushing authority. Vinnie S. |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The hatred being spewed here is all too common in ham radio
today and represents what this once great hobby has degenerated into. When rational minds prevail, virtually all informed sources, both in and out of the FCC, agree that legal precedent is clearly on the side of Mr Baxter, and in the final analysis, Mr Baxter will carry the day, much to the chagrin of his detractors. Lloyd CEO, Dalek Ltd. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Vinnie S. wrote: On 27 Oct 2005 07:31:29 -0700, "an_old_friend" wrote: Sounds like there are some ego-maniacs at work here. I don't see any reason for most of this other than wanting publicity. I do not know anything about K1MAN, other than the fact he is trying to be the Howard Stern of Ham radio, or that is the way it appears to me. that is what some of the postere want you to think at any rate looking past the noise he seems to be an obnoxious fellow who has choosen to test the limits at the FCC. That is exactly what it appears to me from what I have been reading. He is doing nothing more than being anti-establishment or anti-government. Everyone to his own, I guess. Like I said. I am perfectly happy DXing with other fellow hams, without testing limits or pushing authority. right now my only concern with K1MAN is that him having largely coosen to provoke this clash their are good reason he needs to brazen it he may be making a principled stand on something but in any event having started this he needs to see it through Vinnie S. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
an_old_friend wrote:
Vinnie S. wrote: On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:49:07 -0400, "craptosser #3" wrote: "Vinnie S." wrote in message ... On 26 Oct 2005 13:34:04 -0700, wrote: If Hollingsworth Hey, that guy sounds familiar !!!!!! Vinnie S. Hopefully it will be one of several names that will appear on a future NAL to K1MAN for $20K+ in FCC fines. ("from our mouth to G-d's ear") Sounds like there are some ego-maniacs at work here. I don't see any reason for most of this other than wanting publicity. I do not know anything about K1MAN, other than the fact he is trying to be the Howard Stern of Ham radio, or that is the way it appears to me. that is what some of the postere want you to think at any rate looking past the noise he seems to be an obnoxious fellow who has choosen to test the limits at the FCC. not what I call wise to do so but US law does not require wisdom of its cirizens (thank the gods or else there would be no room in jail and kiley no one to gaurd them) U.S. law requires obedience to that law for all who are "cirizens" or "non-cirizens". If everyone is in jail, Kiley can "gaurd" them, Colonel. Dave K8MN |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Vinnie S. wrote: On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:49:07 -0400, "craptosser #3" wrote: "Vinnie S." wrote in message ... On 26 Oct 2005 13:34:04 -0700, wrote: If Hollingsworth Hey, that guy sounds familiar !!!!!! Vinnie S. Hopefully it will be one of several names that will appear on a future NAL to K1MAN for $20K+ in FCC fines. ("from our mouth to G-d's ear") Sounds like there are some ego-maniacs at work here. I don't see any reason for most of this other than wanting publicity. I do not know anything about K1MAN, other than the fact he is trying to be the Howard Stern of Ham radio, or that is the way it appears to me. that is what some of the postere want you to think at any rate looking past the noise he seems to be an obnoxious fellow who has choosen to test the limits at the FCC. not what I call wise to do so but US law does not require wisdom of its cirizens (thank the gods or else there would be no room in jail and kiley no one to gaurd them) U.S. law requires obedience to that law for all who are "cirizens" or "non-cirizens". If everyone is in jail, Kiley can "gaurd" them, Colonel. as point of fact US Law does NOT require any to obey them is simply provides for penalities if you choose to break them , and get caught, and have DA (or other figure as approprate) choose to file charges and after the full due process is gone through proof of the exist in the way companies sometimes choose to pay fins rather than comply with dumping rules for example. BTW as I said NO US LAW or Reg requires or punishses a lack of wisdom Dave K8MN |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Lloyd wrote: The hatred being spewed here is all too common in ham radio today and represents what this once great hobby has degenerated into. When rational minds prevail, virtually all informed sources, both in and out of the FCC, agree that legal precedent is clearly on the side of Mr Baxter, and in the final analysis, Mr Baxter will carry the day, much to the chagrin of his detractors. Lloyd CEO, Dalek Ltd. Go play with your dalek dolls, 32 year old VIRGIN! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|