"Leland C. Scott" wrote:
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 04:21:04 +0000, Steveo wrote:

"Leland C. Scott" wrote:
"U-Know-Who" wrote in message
Since then, have you learned to drive?

Since I was 17 what about you?

I learned when I was about twelve in a ford falcon with the three on
the tree. I sorta ground the gears a bit at first but I finally got the
hang of it after my dad slapped me upside the head a few times.
arrgghhh!

I learned to drive with a 70 Challenger RT running a 383 with a 4 speed.
It wasn't your usual transportation special kids get for their first
car. Clutch friction plates and tires didn't last long on that thing. It
was hard not to squeal the tires a bit in first when letting out the
clutch without letting it slip a lot. I hated to drive in the winter, the
car was way too light in the back end, and way too nose heavy, thus
getting stuck in the snow was a problem.

Regards,

Leland C. Scott
KC8LDO

Those are beautiful cars man, I'm surprised you drove it in the winter.
What color was it, and was it the pistol grip shifter?

Those uni-bodies are light and quick, I always liked the body lines on the
Challengers', was it your car? That's a hell of a machine to learn on.

From: (Leland*C.*Scott)
"I AmnotGeorgeBush" wrote in message
...
Once again, an act that has no relation to another's act can not be used
as an excuse or defense for the original person and their actions.

Perhaps not but in the case I mentioned that

appears to be what happened.


Investigate further. You will find appearances are not what they always
seem.


(snip)

I never questioned their latitude.

those that did lerned it wasn't a

good thing to do.


Relevance to subject, please.

_
You banged up several vehicles, did you not?

Just mine

Then you need improve your driving skill.

Just for your information just because the cop

doesn't show in court doesn't mean an

automatic dismissal.


Not certain what made you think otherwise.


The judge has the option to simply reschedule
the court hearing.


An option he may utilize by following the letter of law which he is
required. You mistakenly claimed the judge is not required to follow the
law.

Most of the time the case is dismissed but

don't bet on it.

Depends on the charge. If it's traffic or misdemeanor and one has proper
representation, I certainly would bet on it.

Regards,

Leland C. Scott

KC8LDO

Hope you had a great holiday and Santa brought everything you wanted.

From: (Leland*C.*Scott)
"Landshark" wrote in message
. net...
Doubt it had anything to do with the officer littering. Most likely he
didn't prove his case or the information on the ticket concerning the
violation wasn't good enough to convict.

I would tend to agree with that analysis. You

have to admit flipping a butt out the window

isn't like chucking a bag full of burger

wrappers, empty drink cups and dirty napkins

from the local fast food joint out the window.

Regards,

Leland C. Scott

KC8LDO


_
Agreed. The cig butt presents much more of a problem than the paper
products which break down over time.

From: (DrDeath)
"I AmnotGeorgeBush" wrote in message
news:27216-43AAAC04-
(snip)
See above. You may be confusing yourself with jury nullification. In any
event, littering was never found to be unconstitutional.

Wanna get out of jury duty, just mention jury

nullification while going through the selection

process.

No doubt. Patriots are considered zealots by the
prosti..uhh..prosecuters.