Message-ID:

an_old_friend wrote:
Ray can we be "butties"?

I used to **** steveo but now i only **** hams with a general or higher
license.

You got sore from me boot****ing you and your no-code cousins.

--
aioe.org sucks used cock

an_old_friend wrote:
Ray can we be "butties"?

I used to **** steveo but now i only **** hams with a general or higher
license.

Steveo I wish you were still my boyfriend.

Steveo typed in
:

Ray Norshine wrote:
Steveo typed in
:

"Jim" wrote:
Google is for Goobers.

Google is for nob gobblers.


Could someone please invent a google filter for usenet!?!

****, that would clean out about 97% of the 'tards that
'stink up the joint' around here. :/

Usenet for the dumb ****s. I mark them 'read' without opening the
posts. it ain't 100% but it works pretty well. Not everyone that uses
google groups is a moron..are they?


There are a few rare exceptions.. Gawd only knows who they are or
which groups they post in, thou..?? Most of the rec.radio goobles
are them 'gobble nobbers' riff raff. ;P

wrote:
Steveo I wish you were still my boyfriend.
fraud

Ray Norshine wrote:
Steveo typed in
:

Ray Norshine wrote:
Steveo typed in
:

"Jim" wrote:
Google is for Goobers.

Google is for nob gobblers.


Could someone please invent a google filter for usenet!?!

****, that would clean out about 97% of the 'tards that
'stink up the joint' around here. :/

Usenet for the dumb ****s. I mark them 'read' without opening the
posts. it ain't 100% but it works pretty well. Not everyone that uses
google groups is a moron..are they?


There are a few rare exceptions.. Gawd only knows who they are or
which groups they post in, thou..?? Most of the rec.radio goobles
are them 'gobble nobbers' riff raff. ;P

Yeah the signal to noise ratio is high with the google-**** posters, no
question about it. I toss most of the stuff in this group as un-read
lately.

CBer's will always survive the **** storm.

wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Ray can we be "butties"?

I used to **** steveo but now i only **** hams with a general or higher
license.
get help fraud

sodomized by an_old_friend wrote:
wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Ray can we be "butties"?

I used to **** steveo but now i only **** hams with a general or higher
license.
get

**** off, retard!

Steveo typed in
:

Ray Norshine wrote:
Steveo typed in
:

Ray Norshine wrote:
Steveo typed in
:

"Jim" wrote:
Google is for Goobers.

Google is for nob gobblers.


Could someone please invent a google filter for usenet!?!

****, that would clean out about 97% of the 'tards that
'stink up the joint' around here. :/

Usenet for the dumb ****s. I mark them 'read' without opening the
posts. it ain't 100% but it works pretty well. Not everyone that
uses google groups is a moron..are they?


There are a few rare exceptions.. Gawd only knows who they are or
which groups they post in, thou..?? Most of the rec.radio goobles
are them 'gobble nobbers' riff raff. ;P

Yeah the signal to noise ratio is high with the google-**** posters,
no question about it. I toss most of the stuff in this group as
un-read lately.

I set my xnews to kill articles crossposted to more than (2) groups.
Even that makes a quite a difference.


CBer's will always survive the **** storm.


***Hurricane Aaron*** ?!?!

K8MNsuxdix wrote:
sodomized by an_old_friend wrote:
wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Ray can we be "butties"?

I used to **** steveo but now i only **** hams with a general or higher
license.
get

**** off, retard!
No
I only **** with humans

get help