In article ,
says...

big snip

Don't worry about BPL. The ARRL, as with Morse Code, is making
a mountain out of a mole hill. If the military isn't worried about its HF
assets, why should Hams be worried?

And how, exactly, do we know the military ISN'T worried about
this?

Common sense alone would dictate that no military source in its
right mind would come out openly opposed to BPL. That'd be no different
from putting up a big billboard saying "To Jam US Military
Communications, Simply Switch On BPL" or something similar.

There are already some heavy hitters (ARINC for one -- or didn't
you know that commercial aircraft flying overseas routes make broad use
of HF?) fighting BPL deployment because it does indeed interfere with
their equipment. That creates more than an annoyance, especially in
ARINC's case -- it becomes a safety issue.

I'm waiting and watching on the whole affair. I don't think anyone
will know for certain how bad things are going to get until BPL starts
to go into deployment. Once the military, and other commercial HF/VHF-
using services, see how much noise they get from power grids so
equipped, I predict it'll get shut down quicker than you can say
'Marconi.'


--
Dr. Anton Squeegee, Director, Dutch Surrealist Plumbing Institute
(Known to some as Bruce Lane, KC7GR)
kyrrin a/t bluefeathertech d-o=t c&o&m
"Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" (Red Green)

In article ,
says...

big snip

Don't worry about BPL. The ARRL, as with Morse Code, is making
a mountain out of a mole hill. If the military isn't worried about its HF
assets, why should Hams be worried?

And how, exactly, do we know the military ISN'T worried about
this?

Common sense alone would dictate that no military source in its
right mind would come out openly opposed to BPL. That'd be no different
from putting up a big billboard saying "To Jam US Military
Communications, Simply Switch On BPL" or something similar.

There are already some heavy hitters (ARINC for one -- or didn't
you know that commercial aircraft flying overseas routes make broad use
of HF?) fighting BPL deployment because it does indeed interfere with
their equipment. That creates more than an annoyance, especially in
ARINC's case -- it becomes a safety issue.

I'm waiting and watching on the whole affair. I don't think anyone
will know for certain how bad things are going to get until BPL starts
to go into deployment. Once the military, and other commercial HF/VHF-
using services, see how much noise they get from power grids so
equipped, I predict it'll get shut down quicker than you can say
'Marconi.'


--
Dr. Anton Squeegee, Director, Dutch Surrealist Plumbing Institute
(Known to some as Bruce Lane, KC7GR)
kyrrin a/t bluefeathertech d-o=t c&o&m
"Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" (Red Green)

On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:23:58 GMT, David Stinson
wrote:


2. To "harvest" clean spectrum in a quiet location and
bring it to your receiver, so you can continue
your radio hobby regardless of what BPL or any
other interferance source does to your local radio environment.


Just because you can hear a station at a quiet remote location doesn't
mean that they are going to hear you when you transmit from your
location. Shouldn't the transmitter and receiver be at the same
place?. It still doesn't guaranty that you will be heard but it gives
you a chance. Propagation is dependant on geography and geology too, I
think, no?

Jeannette kc6jet
Jeannette Bristol 32, San Francisco
http://www.eblw.com/contepartiro/contepartiro.html

On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:23:58 GMT, David Stinson
wrote:


2. To "harvest" clean spectrum in a quiet location and
bring it to your receiver, so you can continue
your radio hobby regardless of what BPL or any
other interferance source does to your local radio environment.


Just because you can hear a station at a quiet remote location doesn't
mean that they are going to hear you when you transmit from your
location. Shouldn't the transmitter and receiver be at the same
place?. It still doesn't guaranty that you will be heard but it gives
you a chance. Propagation is dependant on geography and geology too, I
think, no?

Jeannette kc6jet
Jeannette Bristol 32, San Francisco
http://www.eblw.com/contepartiro/contepartiro.html