Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am working to replace an aging radio relay system with something a
little more modern. The limiting factor in the replacement design is that it must be low power consumption. The wishlist includes: 1) transmit digitally-encoded analog signal, 2) remote assessment of battery condition, solar panel current output, site dewpoint and temperature, 3) possibly allow for activation of cable heater to deice antenna. The sites cover 150 mile diameter region with few opportunities for shore power. I must get the system working off of batteries that are recharged by solar panels. The existing system already has a power infrastructure, but I could add additional gel cells to get the antenna heaters working. If that is impractical, I would like to encode and store data on site until the antenna is capable of transmitting a signal. I have been reviewing my options and I have identified two possibilities: AX.25 and IRLP. I read quite a bit of the dissent about the utility of AX.25, although I haven't read a reasoned argument regarding its viability. I cannot have UDP packets floating about; I need error correction. The data that is being transmitted is too important to allow for package loss. Can I get a good argument pro and con for either of these protocols, or perhaps some help in identifying an alternative technology. ADVthanksANCE |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|