Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can any one point me to a good expalnation of why PSK31 should be operated
at low power ??? Have heard for a 100 Watt rig keep it throttled back to 35 Watts also heard 50 Watts. I think it has to do distortion if higher power is used But would like to see some detailed info on this Post here as I must remain anon on the NG's Thanks -- Keyboard In The Noise Opinions are the cheapest commodities in the world. Author unknown but "right on" |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Keyboard In The Noise" wrote in message
news:n%2yc.34114$tI2.12543@fed1read07... Can any one point me to a good expalnation of why PSK31 should be operated at low power ??? PSK-31, more so than most modes, requires that amateurs respect each other's need to communicate. It is a very narrow band mode, and requires astonishingly low power to be effective. PSK is even more narrow banded than CW. The narrower the bandwidth, the less power you need to make it above the noise. Furthermore, on PSK, the DSP algorithms are good enough that you only need to be barely above the noise for 100% copy. Once you have achieved 100% copy there is nothing to gain by having a stronger signal. Most amateurs use SSB rigs on PSK. Unlike CW, where a sharp filter can keep a strong station out of the passband (and out of the AGC), on PSK the entire PSK band is one SSB signal wide. If there is one strong station, that station is going to prevent everyone else on the band from hearing their own QSOs. Running 100 watts on PSK is the very definition of a LID. Have heard for a 100 Watt rig keep it throttled back to 35 Watts also heard 50 Watts. 35 watts is probably tops for most conditions. A good operator will keep his power well below that, and only crank it up to 35 or so when conditions are truly horrid. I think it has to do distortion if higher power is used Most SSB rigs can't deliver full power continuously. They are rated for peak power at a very low duty cycle. Many will toast their finals at 100 watts continuous. Depending on the rig and how you make the measurements, many cannot make more than half power without distortion, and distortion on PSK is a very bad thing. But this should be a moot point anyway. Most of the time you should be able to make the contact at a watt or so. Sometimes you may need to crank it up to 5 or 10, but if you need a lot more than that, something is very wrong. Most likely, some other LID on the band is running 100 watts. Sadly, PSK seems to be experiencing the sort of power warfare that makes 20 phone such an awful place. A few years ago, it was rare to hear a station running more than 2 or 3 watts. Now it seems like 20 is a lot more common. Unfortunately, a lot of 20 watt stations means that other stations need to run higher power, too. I am speaking here of 14 MHz and up. On the lower frequencies, especially 3.5 MHz, there is a need for a little more power. But at 14 MHz and up, the only reason to need more than about a watt is because QRM from stations running too much power are interfering with the receiving station. ... |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Keyboard In The Noise" wrote in message
news:n%2yc.34114$tI2.12543@fed1read07... Can any one point me to a good expalnation of why PSK31 should be operated at low power ??? PSK-31, more so than most modes, requires that amateurs respect each other's need to communicate. It is a very narrow band mode, and requires astonishingly low power to be effective. PSK is even more narrow banded than CW. The narrower the bandwidth, the less power you need to make it above the noise. Furthermore, on PSK, the DSP algorithms are good enough that you only need to be barely above the noise for 100% copy. Once you have achieved 100% copy there is nothing to gain by having a stronger signal. Most amateurs use SSB rigs on PSK. Unlike CW, where a sharp filter can keep a strong station out of the passband (and out of the AGC), on PSK the entire PSK band is one SSB signal wide. If there is one strong station, that station is going to prevent everyone else on the band from hearing their own QSOs. Running 100 watts on PSK is the very definition of a LID. Have heard for a 100 Watt rig keep it throttled back to 35 Watts also heard 50 Watts. 35 watts is probably tops for most conditions. A good operator will keep his power well below that, and only crank it up to 35 or so when conditions are truly horrid. I think it has to do distortion if higher power is used Most SSB rigs can't deliver full power continuously. They are rated for peak power at a very low duty cycle. Many will toast their finals at 100 watts continuous. Depending on the rig and how you make the measurements, many cannot make more than half power without distortion, and distortion on PSK is a very bad thing. But this should be a moot point anyway. Most of the time you should be able to make the contact at a watt or so. Sometimes you may need to crank it up to 5 or 10, but if you need a lot more than that, something is very wrong. Most likely, some other LID on the band is running 100 watts. Sadly, PSK seems to be experiencing the sort of power warfare that makes 20 phone such an awful place. A few years ago, it was rare to hear a station running more than 2 or 3 watts. Now it seems like 20 is a lot more common. Unfortunately, a lot of 20 watt stations means that other stations need to run higher power, too. I am speaking here of 14 MHz and up. On the lower frequencies, especially 3.5 MHz, there is a need for a little more power. But at 14 MHz and up, the only reason to need more than about a watt is because QRM from stations running too much power are interfering with the receiving station. ... |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My opinion only
- PSK has a pretty constant output that can exceed the duty cycle of a SSB transmitter. Hence reducing the drive to a lower output is kind of like the same average output on SSB - PSK is also sensitive to non linearity and ALC/VOGAD/processors make a mess of it. The trick to setting it up is to supply a test tone and adjust the mic gain for zero indication on the ALC meter. It is also worthwhile doing some linearity checks. ie using the PC sound card (PSK test signal) alter the output by -3 and -6dB. Check that there is a corresponding linear change in RF output power. Cheers Bob VK2YQA Keyboard In The Noise wrote: Can any one point me to a good expalnation of why PSK31 should be operated at low power ??? Have heard for a 100 Watt rig keep it throttled back to 35 Watts also heard 50 Watts. I think it has to do distortion if higher power is used But would like to see some detailed info on this Post here as I must remain anon on the NG's Thanks -- Keyboard In The Noise Opinions are the cheapest commodities in the world. Author unknown but "right on" |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My opinion only
- PSK has a pretty constant output that can exceed the duty cycle of a SSB transmitter. Hence reducing the drive to a lower output is kind of like the same average output on SSB - PSK is also sensitive to non linearity and ALC/VOGAD/processors make a mess of it. The trick to setting it up is to supply a test tone and adjust the mic gain for zero indication on the ALC meter. It is also worthwhile doing some linearity checks. ie using the PC sound card (PSK test signal) alter the output by -3 and -6dB. Check that there is a corresponding linear change in RF output power. Cheers Bob VK2YQA Keyboard In The Noise wrote: Can any one point me to a good expalnation of why PSK31 should be operated at low power ??? Have heard for a 100 Watt rig keep it throttled back to 35 Watts also heard 50 Watts. I think it has to do distortion if higher power is used But would like to see some detailed info on this Post here as I must remain anon on the NG's Thanks -- Keyboard In The Noise Opinions are the cheapest commodities in the world. Author unknown but "right on" |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is an answer I received else where
Tis what I was looking for Thanks to all who responded ------------------------------ When PSK31 is in idle mode, it is a two-tone signal having a peak to average power ratio of 2:1 or 3 db. So, if your average-reading meter shows 17 watts and YOU ARE NOT FLAT-TOPPING OR OTHERWISE DISTORTING THE SIGNAL, then your peak power or pep is 34 watts. This should be well within the linear range of the Jupiter. About the only way you can really be sure about what you are doing with PSK31 is to examine the r-f output envelope of the transmitter signal while in PSK31 idle mode. You should see the classic two-tone wave pattern that was in the ARRL Handbook for many years. The peaks should be clean and continuous, looking like sine waves without any flattened portions, etc. The most power that you can run with any transmitter under these conditions is that power level which produces a clean two-tone output signal without distortion of the signal peaks. The numerical measure of this is the 3rd-order IMD distortion component. It should be at least 25 db below peak power and preferably more than 30 db below. Most modern rigs if not overdriven, etc. can produce -25 to -30 db IMD performance. Most PSK31 operators find that average power levels in the 15 to 30 watt range - corresponding to pep levels of 30 to 60 watts - are more than adequate for PSK31 operation. Most transmitters tend to increase their intermodulation distortion product generation as power output goes up. As in most of ham radio, there is nothing to be gained by running more power than it takes for the guy at the other end to copy you. With PSK31, you run the risk of a broad signal and interfering with others if you try to run more power than your equipment is capable of handling while still maintaining 3rd-order IMD performance of -25 db or better. -- Keyboard In The Noise Opinions are the cheapest commodities in the world. Author unknown but "right on |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is an answer I received else where
Tis what I was looking for Thanks to all who responded ------------------------------ When PSK31 is in idle mode, it is a two-tone signal having a peak to average power ratio of 2:1 or 3 db. So, if your average-reading meter shows 17 watts and YOU ARE NOT FLAT-TOPPING OR OTHERWISE DISTORTING THE SIGNAL, then your peak power or pep is 34 watts. This should be well within the linear range of the Jupiter. About the only way you can really be sure about what you are doing with PSK31 is to examine the r-f output envelope of the transmitter signal while in PSK31 idle mode. You should see the classic two-tone wave pattern that was in the ARRL Handbook for many years. The peaks should be clean and continuous, looking like sine waves without any flattened portions, etc. The most power that you can run with any transmitter under these conditions is that power level which produces a clean two-tone output signal without distortion of the signal peaks. The numerical measure of this is the 3rd-order IMD distortion component. It should be at least 25 db below peak power and preferably more than 30 db below. Most modern rigs if not overdriven, etc. can produce -25 to -30 db IMD performance. Most PSK31 operators find that average power levels in the 15 to 30 watt range - corresponding to pep levels of 30 to 60 watts - are more than adequate for PSK31 operation. Most transmitters tend to increase their intermodulation distortion product generation as power output goes up. As in most of ham radio, there is nothing to be gained by running more power than it takes for the guy at the other end to copy you. With PSK31, you run the risk of a broad signal and interfering with others if you try to run more power than your equipment is capable of handling while still maintaining 3rd-order IMD performance of -25 db or better. -- Keyboard In The Noise Opinions are the cheapest commodities in the world. Author unknown but "right on |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C | Boatanchors | |||
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C | Boatanchors | |||
Current in loading coil, EZNEC - helix | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna |