Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() In article , Bert Hyman wrote: How should a QSL card in response to an SWL be filled out so it's of some value to them? It would depend on the exact format of your QSL card, but basically, fill out all the normal time, date, and frequency info, then change the places that imply a two-way contact. For example, in the RST box you could draw a line or put "SWL." And if your cards have a line that says, "Confirming QSO with," you could cross out "QSO with" and write in "SWL by." 73, Patty N6BIS |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
(OT) : Whether It Is Better To Reply . . . Or Not To Reply ? | Shortwave | |||
Test - do not reply | Shortwave | |||
test2 - do not reply | Shortwave | |||
BPL Reply Comments | Policy |