Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
We have skilled DX operators using state of the art equipment belting out CW
at 40 wpm or better. Add a little atmospheric noise, some QSB and QRN joining in over a great distance and that 599 signal we are always reporting is more like a 339 in most places. Then add to that the megacycle cops and the CQer's and other assorted vermin who feel we won't adequately appreciate our contact without thier assistance to overcome. It's amazing that anybody can hear anything. And how many of us can really copy 40 WPM? As I get older, I see more people are more concerned not with what they may be able to get but by what they can keep others from getting. It would be interesting to me to know how many of those trying so hard to wreck a frequency have already had a good contact with the entity. Any thoughts on this rambling subject? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "N1KI" wrote in message ... We have skilled DX operators using state of the art equipment belting out CW at 40 wpm or better. Add a little atmospheric noise, some QSB and QRN joining in over a great distance and that 599 signal we are always reporting is more like a 339 in most places. Then add to that the megacycle cops and the CQer's and other assorted vermin who feel we won't adequately appreciate our contact without thier assistance to overcome. It's amazing that anybody can hear anything. And how many of us can really copy 40 WPM? As I get older, I see more people are more concerned not with what they may be able to get but by what they can keep others from getting. It would be interesting to me to know how many of those trying so hard to wreck a frequency have already had a good contact with the entity. Any thoughts on this rambling subject? Just my 2 IRC's worth. I don't think there are very many trying to "wreck" the frequency, but it only takes a few to really mess things up. Such as the carrier throwers and the idiot that refuses to move off the DX frequency (because he has a sked there every day) Some cops mean well trying to get the numbnuts informed, but most just add to the confusion. And don't you love the big gun who makes the contact and sez "I worked u yesterday and just wanted to see if I could break this pileup." But over the last 30 years I don't see much change -- same o same o But I guess that we ought to keep in mind that in any given pileup, there are hundreds (sounds like thousands ?) of disciplined operators doing the right thing. As they sed in my Navy days, there is the ten percent that don't get the word. And if they do -- don't understand it. CL-- I doubt, therefore I might be ! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
While the use of a CW speed that is too fast for conditions is a problem, I
submit these problems too: DX station does not finish a contact with the other station's call - there are times when one can not be sure that a contact was made (I get confused with N7TT (who is a DXer) and sometimes my call gets put down as N6TT) DX station does not provide his/her call at reasonable intervals Occasionally, a DX station does not use "split" operation Calling stations call even when it is clear the DX station is working someone else - because of the timing involved, this is going to happen once in a while with any of us Some DX stations do not understand propagation - certain parts of the world may only have a narrow time window - this is seen dramatically when polar region is between stations All that said, and more could be said by us all, many DX stations perform an excellent job of contacting the deserving and undeserving. Listing problems may help. 73 and DX, Mac N8TT -- J. Mc Laughlin; Michigan U.S.A. Home: |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "J. Mc Laughlin" wrote in message ... While the use of a CW speed that is too fast for conditions is a problem, I submit these problems too: DX station does not finish a contact with the other station's call - there are times when one can not be sure that a contact was made (I get confused with N7TT (who is a DXer) and sometimes my call gets put down as N6TT) DX station does not provide his/her call at reasonable intervals Occasionally, a DX station does not use "split" operation Calling stations call even when it is clear the DX station is working someone else - because of the timing involved, this is going to happen once in a while with any of us Some DX stations do not understand propagation - certain parts of the world may only have a narrow time window - this is seen dramatically when polar region is between stations All that said, and more could be said by us all, many DX stations perform an excellent job of contacting the deserving and undeserving. Listing problems may help. 73 and DX, Mac N8TT -- J. Mc Laughlin; Michigan U.S.A. Home: I guess all that is why they dubbed it "Amateur" Radio How to conduct a DX operation is on the internet. See URL: http://www.guam.net/pub/midxa/nl/nl_apr98.html How to work DX is in several books and the internet http://www.algonet.se/~sm5arl/Pileup.html http://home.alltel.net/johnshan/dx_ss_working.html Great DX Books -- The complete DXer http://www.idiompress.com/books-complete-dxer.html DX101x -- http://ac6v.com/DXSAMPLE.htm Spread the word ya all CL |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Noise Problem on 11955kHz | Shortwave | |||
HELP: 2 meter repeater intermod problem from pager transmitters | General | |||
OT EMI problem with stove and internet connection | Homebrew | |||
National NCX-5 transmit/receive offset problem | Equipment | |||
National NCX-5 transmit/receive offset problem | Equipment |