Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does FT5XO have an online log?
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:52:15 GMT, N1KI wrote:
Does FT5XO have an online log? No. -- Bob Nielsen, N7XY n7xy (at) n7xy.net Bainbridge Island, WA http://www.n7xy.net |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
N1KI wrote:
Does FT5XO have an online log? No Gerry K1NY |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
N1KI wrote:
Does FT5XO have an online log? Why would you need one? Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin -- Was schlechten Geschmack so berauschend macht, ist die aristokratische Wonne der VerÀrgerung. -- Charles Baudelaire |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"N1KI" wrote in message
... In article , wrote: N1KI wrote: Does FT5XO have an online log? Why would you need one? Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin Once I know a dxpeditioin has my call sign entered in their log correctly, I quit calling them. That way others who still need to work them have a better chance of doing so. It is called courtesy, something you don't see much on on major dxpedition frequencies, so I understand why you would ask.. You mean you can't tell if you worked them, if you work them ??? I'm soooo confused ... -- ... Hank http://home.earthlink.net/~horedson http://home.earthlink.net/~w0rli |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Hank Oredson" wrote:
"N1KI" wrote in message ... In article , wrote: N1KI wrote: Does FT5XO have an online log? Why would you need one? Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin Once I know a dxpeditioin has my call sign entered in their log correctly, I quit calling them. That way others who still need to work them have a better chance of doing so. It is called courtesy, something you don't see much on on major dxpedition frequencies, so I understand why you would ask.. You mean you can't tell if you worked them, if you work them ??? I'm soooo confused ... Then I will make it simple. The key words are "log" and "entered correctly". Typo's and transpositions do occur. If you need more help with simple words and concepts, please feel free to ask. I try to exercise patience as well as courtesy. Unless, of course, you are wasting bandwith by trolling. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "N1KI" wrote in message ... In article , "Hank Oredson" wrote: "N1KI" wrote in message ... In article , wrote: N1KI wrote: Does FT5XO have an online log? Why would you need one? Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin Once I know a dxpeditioin has my call sign entered in their log correctly, I quit calling them. That way others who still need to work them have a better chance of doing so. It is called courtesy, something you don't see much on on major dxpedition frequencies, so I understand why you would ask.. You mean you can't tell if you worked them, if you work them ??? I'm soooo confused ... Then I will make it simple. The key words are "log" and "entered correctly". Typo's and transpositions do occur. If you need more help with simple words and concepts, please feel free to ask. I try to exercise patience as well as courtesy. Unless, of course, you are wasting bandwith by trolling. I had one entirely miss logging my contact one time. There was no confusion as to who they were talking to but it simply didn't get logged. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There's more to why, if possible, on-line logs are a real help..
Hank Oredson wrote: "N1KI" wrote in message ... In article , wrote: N1KI wrote: Does FT5XO have an online log? Why would you need one? Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin Once I know a dxpeditioin has my call sign entered in their log correctly, I quit calling them. That way others who still need to work them have a better chance of doing so. It is called courtesy, something you don't see much on on major dxpedition frequencies, so I understand why you would ask.. You mean you can't tell if you worked them, if you work them ??? I'm soooo confused ... The issue is that pirate operations also are out there that make contacts using the official call. This operation was very kind not to divulge the expected call until they went on the air. That does help prevent the fraudlent operations using the call, to a point. But the problem still exists, even with good DX operations, operators and so on. In really wanted and needed operations like this one, without an on-line log, you may get a 'perfect' copy and reply to you from a station signing the needed call. But is it real? Thus, especially on low band operation where path headings, opening time windows and so on, are a lot harder to spot for many people, the only way to really make a best effort possible to be *SURE* you got the station .. is to make a duplicate QSO on bands really needed. Especially low band operations. Net effect; without on-line log confirmations, those duplicate QSO operations really add to the noise and QRM. Often to be met by the really good operations answer of "DUPE!" in some casesd, in others the DX station just ignores the dupe issue. And at that point, here goes more and more calling by really decent people, who simply are trying to guarantee that rare moment for all we work so hard to make possible. Both the DX operation, and even the best operators who are polite, kind and attentive to others as to feelings - can suffer from lack of on-line logs, if they can be enabled, for this reason. W5WQN -- -- Sleep well; OS2's still awake! ![]() Mike Luther |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
HOW LONG IS CRANUS THE ANUS GONNA HIDE? | CB | |||
Any Good Or Useful For Listening Only ?: WiNRADiO WR-LWA-0130 Long Wire Antenna Adapter | Antenna | |||
Help:Tower installation/repair Long Island | Antenna | |||
Opinions please G5 against long wire against windom? | Antenna |