Rene schrieb:


That table is just a lot of bull****, those figures are completely
useless and far away from truth...
I wonder why you post this useless info into 5 newsgroups without
verifying the figures.
Are you paid by diamond?

By the way, your menu is still not visible with netscape navigator...


73
Peter,DF3KV

Please explain why the table is nonsense, if you claim it is!

just one example:

you see with first glance that the claimed gain figures are
much to high,
how can an antenna 30% longer than a halfwave show 3dbs of gain
and 1/4 Lambda more yields in another 1,5db more gain?


Please be a bit creative yourself.

I have always been...


And Netscape: we stopped using that about 8 years ago...

fine for YOU

It would be a could idea before spamming newsgroups
to test how things are showing up with all common browsers,
there are people around the world who do not use Microsoft software
on porpuse


Rene

Peter

mensch Meier,
da hat jemand mit einem Beitrag, den man einfach wegclicken konnte fasst
genau soviel Beisser und Beller wachgemacht, wie Nils.
Heiner,
der ganz schnell in den Keller muss, da ist ne Schüppe umgefallen (Top1).

Hello Peter,

I saw again your negative comments.

Renember my diamond info is based on dBi,
2,15 less and you get dbd.

Do you think diamond want to risk there name to
put some false gain numbers on the antenna?

If a antenne does not do what it is expect to do
we can claim the money back.
Do you realy think diamond would take that risk?

Why do you think diamond has verry expensive
measure equipment?

Im wondering were your homepage is, I asume
everything must be perfect on your homepage.
So maybe you done a lot of work too (like i did),
so there might be some intresting info? (let us know!).
I saw it wasn't ready on qsl.net server.

Cor

"Peter Völpel" schreef in bericht
...
c schrieb:

Hello All,

I have comparisation information from 20 different
Diamond antennas (verticals).
For the bands: 50/144/430/1200Mhz.
Compare the gain and the length.

All information is to see in a nice chart!

http://www.qsl.net/pd0rkc (Click on technics).

73's Cor


That table is just a lot of bull****, those figures are completely
useless and far away from truth...
I wonder why you post this useless info into 5 newsgroups without
verifying the figures.
Are you paid by diamond?

By the way, your menu is still not visible with netscape navigator...


73
Peter,DF3KV

Hello All,

Sorry for the netscape users.
I used netscape browser many years back, Im glad
with the microsoft browser.
Netscape gave me some problems with some
goverment page's (wich microsoft ie doesn't).
Netscape does not know all the html code's like
the fixed function in the background sentence (and
many more).

These fixed command is verry famous in the
internet world.

But do not worrie netscape comes with updates
they are always a littlebit later than microsoft!

Cor

Hello All,

Sorry for the netscape users.
I used netscape browser many years back, Im glad
with the microsoft browser.
Netscape gave me some problems with some
goverment page's (wich microsoft ie doesn't).
Netscape does not know all the html code's like
the fixed function in the background sentence (and
many more).

These fixed command is verry famous in the
internet world.

But do not worrie netscape comes with updates
they are always a littlebit later than microsoft!

Cor

"Peter Völpel" schreef in bericht
...
c schrieb:

Hello All,

I have comparisation information from 20 different
Diamond antennas (verticals).
For the bands: 50/144/430/1200Mhz.
Compare the gain and the length.

All information is to see in a nice chart!

http://www.qsl.net/pd0rkc (Click on technics).

73's Cor


That table is just a lot of bull****, those figures are completely
useless and far away from truth...
I wonder why you post this useless info into 5 newsgroups without
verifying the figures.
Are you paid by diamond?

By the way, your menu is still not visible with netscape navigator...


73
Peter,DF3KV

Please explain why the table is nonsense, if you claim it is!

Please be a bit creative yourself.

And Netscape: we stopped using that about 8 years ago...

Rene

Hello Peter,

I saw again your negative comments.

Renember my diamond info is based on dBi,
2,15 less and you get dbd.

Do you think diamond want to risk there name to
put some false gain numbers on the antenna?

If a antenne does not do what it is expect to do
we can claim the money back.
Do you realy think diamond would take that risk?

Why do you think diamond has verry expensive
measure equipment?

Im wondering were your homepage is, I asume
everything must be perfect on your homepage.
So maybe you done a lot of work too (like i did),
so there might be some intresting info? (let us know!).
I saw it wasn't ready on qsl.net server.

Cor

"Peter Völpel" schreef in bericht
...
c schrieb:

Hello All,

I have comparisation information from 20 different
Diamond antennas (verticals).
For the bands: 50/144/430/1200Mhz.
Compare the gain and the length.

All information is to see in a nice chart!

http://www.qsl.net/pd0rkc (Click on technics).

73's Cor


That table is just a lot of bull****, those figures are completely
useless and far away from truth...
I wonder why you post this useless info into 5 newsgroups without
verifying the figures.
Are you paid by diamond?

By the way, your menu is still not visible with netscape navigator...


73
Peter,DF3KV