Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rene schrieb:
That table is just a lot of bull****, those figures are completely useless and far away from truth... I wonder why you post this useless info into 5 newsgroups without verifying the figures. Are you paid by diamond? By the way, your menu is still not visible with netscape navigator... 73 Peter,DF3KV Please explain why the table is nonsense, if you claim it is! just one example: you see with first glance that the claimed gain figures are much to high, how can an antenna 30% longer than a halfwave show 3dbs of gain and 1/4 Lambda more yields in another 1,5db more gain? Please be a bit creative yourself. I have always been... And Netscape: we stopped using that about 8 years ago... fine for YOU It would be a could idea before spamming newsgroups to test how things are showing up with all common browsers, there are people around the world who do not use Microsoft software on porpuse Rene Peter |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
mensch Meier,
da hat jemand mit einem Beitrag, den man einfach wegclicken konnte fasst genau soviel Beisser und Beller wachgemacht, wie Nils. Heiner, der ganz schnell in den Keller muss, da ist ne Schüppe umgefallen (Top1). |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Peter,
I saw again your negative comments. Renember my diamond info is based on dBi, 2,15 less and you get dbd. Do you think diamond want to risk there name to put some false gain numbers on the antenna? If a antenne does not do what it is expect to do we can claim the money back. Do you realy think diamond would take that risk? Why do you think diamond has verry expensive measure equipment? Im wondering were your homepage is, I asume everything must be perfect on your homepage. So maybe you done a lot of work too (like i did), so there might be some intresting info? (let us know!). I saw it wasn't ready on qsl.net server. Cor "Peter Völpel" schreef in bericht ... c schrieb: Hello All, I have comparisation information from 20 different Diamond antennas (verticals). For the bands: 50/144/430/1200Mhz. Compare the gain and the length. All information is to see in a nice chart! http://www.qsl.net/pd0rkc (Click on technics). 73's Cor That table is just a lot of bull****, those figures are completely useless and far away from truth... I wonder why you post this useless info into 5 newsgroups without verifying the figures. Are you paid by diamond? By the way, your menu is still not visible with netscape navigator... 73 Peter,DF3KV |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello All,
Sorry for the netscape users. I used netscape browser many years back, Im glad with the microsoft browser. Netscape gave me some problems with some goverment page's (wich microsoft ie doesn't). Netscape does not know all the html code's like the fixed function in the background sentence (and many more). These fixed command is verry famous in the internet world. But do not worrie netscape comes with updates they are always a littlebit later than microsoft! Cor |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello All,
Sorry for the netscape users. I used netscape browser many years back, Im glad with the microsoft browser. Netscape gave me some problems with some goverment page's (wich microsoft ie doesn't). Netscape does not know all the html code's like the fixed function in the background sentence (and many more). These fixed command is verry famous in the internet world. But do not worrie netscape comes with updates they are always a littlebit later than microsoft! Cor |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Völpel" schreef in bericht ... c schrieb: Hello All, I have comparisation information from 20 different Diamond antennas (verticals). For the bands: 50/144/430/1200Mhz. Compare the gain and the length. All information is to see in a nice chart! http://www.qsl.net/pd0rkc (Click on technics). 73's Cor That table is just a lot of bull****, those figures are completely useless and far away from truth... I wonder why you post this useless info into 5 newsgroups without verifying the figures. Are you paid by diamond? By the way, your menu is still not visible with netscape navigator... 73 Peter,DF3KV Please explain why the table is nonsense, if you claim it is! Please be a bit creative yourself. And Netscape: we stopped using that about 8 years ago... Rene |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Peter,
I saw again your negative comments. Renember my diamond info is based on dBi, 2,15 less and you get dbd. Do you think diamond want to risk there name to put some false gain numbers on the antenna? If a antenne does not do what it is expect to do we can claim the money back. Do you realy think diamond would take that risk? Why do you think diamond has verry expensive measure equipment? Im wondering were your homepage is, I asume everything must be perfect on your homepage. So maybe you done a lot of work too (like i did), so there might be some intresting info? (let us know!). I saw it wasn't ready on qsl.net server. Cor "Peter Völpel" schreef in bericht ... c schrieb: Hello All, I have comparisation information from 20 different Diamond antennas (verticals). For the bands: 50/144/430/1200Mhz. Compare the gain and the length. All information is to see in a nice chart! http://www.qsl.net/pd0rkc (Click on technics). 73's Cor That table is just a lot of bull****, those figures are completely useless and far away from truth... I wonder why you post this useless info into 5 newsgroups without verifying the figures. Are you paid by diamond? By the way, your menu is still not visible with netscape navigator... 73 Peter,DF3KV |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
6/2/70/23 vertical Diamond antennas (information). | Antenna |