Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anyone else notice what I see as an apparent instability in the OH2AQ
Web cluster of late? Here it seems as if it is unavailable for long periods of time. As well, the automatic update for a given selection, like CW-DX for example, doesn't auto-update? You have to manually probe it for a reload for the frame? Or is this a reflection of its popularity and demand, and we're just too fond of it? Thanks! W5WQN |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
mike luther wrote:
Anyone else notice what I see as an apparent instability in the OH2AQ Web cluster of late? Here it seems as if it is unavailable for long periods of time. As well, the automatic update for a given selection, like CW-DX for example, doesn't auto-update? You have to manually probe it for a reload for the frame? Or is this a reflection of its popularity and demand, and we're just too fond of it? Thanks! W5WQN The OH2AQ cluster is a marvelous tool for DXers, but it needs better management. If it can't get better management, it should be discontinued, because the erratic behavior of it is a pain in the ass. Bill W0IYH |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
William E. Sabin sabinw@mwci-news wrote:
The OH2AQ cluster is a marvelous tool for DXers, but it needs better management. Go ahead. Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin -- There's a remote exploit it in the free market, whereby you can boot the price of something by talking crap. It was reported to Bugtraq yesterday, and I'd post a link to bugzilla.nyse.ftc.gov, but they don't allow links from slashdot. -- http://www.petitiononline.com/nosco/petition.html |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Lemken wrote:
William E. Sabin sabinw@mwci-news wrote: The OH2AQ cluster is a marvelous tool for DXers, but it needs better management. Go ahead. Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin If I had any interest in running that net I would "go ahead" as you put it. But I don't have any interest in running it. Therefore if the people who are *are* running the net don't want to maintain it properly they should shut it down and forget about it. Or maybe they can persuade you to "go ahead". Bill W0IYH |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 07 Dec 2003 21:20:57 -0600, "William E. Sabin"
sabinw@mwci-news wrote: The OH2AQ cluster is a marvelous tool for DXers, but ...... But it's a kludy interface, and the guys who run it, whomever they are, have NEVER been responsive to anyone using it. Bill, there are hundreds of cluster nodes you can telnet to, spots are real time, you have filter options on some of them, and most of them are up all the time (with the exception of contest weekends, when the whole network chokes & croaks). OH2AQ is feed by telnet clusters, so anything you see there you'll see it somewhere else first. Any spots you see on the web cluster you'll see on the telnet nodes also. Here's a list of 100 or so to get you started: http://www.cpcug.org/user/wfeidt/Misc/cluster.html I run two nodes which are on the list and you are welcome to use them if you'd like. The only suggestion I'd make is DON'T use the Windows telnet program, it's garbage, get another telnet program like NetTerm, or use the interface in your logging software if it has one. 73, Jim KH2D |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 07 Dec 2003 21:20:57 -0600, "William E. Sabin"
sabinw@mwci-news wrote: The OH2AQ cluster is a marvelous tool for DXers, but ...... But it's a kludy interface, and the guys who run it, whomever they are, have NEVER been responsive to anyone using it. Bill, there are hundreds of cluster nodes you can telnet to, spots are real time, you have filter options on some of them, and most of them are up all the time (with the exception of contest weekends, when the whole network chokes & croaks). OH2AQ is feed by telnet clusters, so anything you see there you'll see it somewhere else first. Any spots you see on the web cluster you'll see on the telnet nodes also. Here's a list of 100 or so to get you started: http://www.cpcug.org/user/wfeidt/Misc/cluster.html I run two nodes which are on the list and you are welcome to use them if you'd like. The only suggestion I'd make is DON'T use the Windows telnet program, it's garbage, get another telnet program like NetTerm, or use the interface in your logging software if it has one. 73, Jim KH2D |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Lemken wrote:
William E. Sabin sabinw@mwci-news wrote: The OH2AQ cluster is a marvelous tool for DXers, but it needs better management. Go ahead. Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin If I had any interest in running that net I would "go ahead" as you put it. But I don't have any interest in running it. Therefore if the people who are *are* running the net don't want to maintain it properly they should shut it down and forget about it. Or maybe they can persuade you to "go ahead". Bill W0IYH |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
William E. Sabin sabinw@mwci-news wrote:
The OH2AQ cluster is a marvelous tool for DXers, but it needs better management. Go ahead. Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin -- There's a remote exploit it in the free market, whereby you can boot the price of something by talking crap. It was reported to Bugtraq yesterday, and I'd post a link to bugzilla.nyse.ftc.gov, but they don't allow links from slashdot. -- http://www.petitiononline.com/nosco/petition.html |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "mike luther" wrote in message ... Anyone else notice what I see as an apparent instability in the OH2AQ Web cluster of late? Here it seems as if it is unavailable for long periods of time. As well, the automatic update for a given selection, like CW-DX for example, doesn't auto-update? You have to manually probe it for a reload for the frame? For ON and LX I experimented very few denied. Theyr mainly occured this 2 last weeks but the service was again available a few hours later. In average I find the service often accessible In the meantime I made a connexion directly on a cluster like EA7URC. Thierry ON4SKY, LX3SKY http://www.astrosurf.com/lombry Or is this a reflection of its popularity and demand, and we're just too fond of it? Thanks! W5WQN |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
mike luther wrote:
Anyone else notice what I see as an apparent instability in the OH2AQ Web cluster of late? Here it seems as if it is unavailable for long periods of time. As well, the automatic update for a given selection, like CW-DX for example, doesn't auto-update? You have to manually probe it for a reload for the frame? Or is this a reflection of its popularity and demand, and we're just too fond of it? Thanks! W5WQN The OH2AQ cluster is a marvelous tool for DXers, but it needs better management. If it can't get better management, it should be discontinued, because the erratic behavior of it is a pain in the ass. Bill W0IYH |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Heathkit TX-1: Need "Late" Production Run Docs | Boatanchors | |||
OH2BU Cluster down comments? | Dx | |||
OH2BU Cluster down comments? | Dx |