Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is it ok to ask about FM Stereo antennas here?
I'm running this Radio Shack 6-element FM antenna for a station at 107.3 http://www.radioshack.com/product.as...t%5Fid=15-2163 Usually it's clear in mono but not in stereo. Sometimes it's distorted in mono. Would a Delphi QFM-9 be much stronger and maybe clear this up? http://starkelectronic.com/fmpage.htm 3rd one down Thanks in advance. -- Ed Light Smiley :-/ MS Smiley :-\ Send spam to the FTC at Thanks, robots. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I suspect your problem is that the antenna is seeing a signal that has
some components from reflections off of other building, hills, ridges, etc. It is called multi-path. My first approach would be to get the antenna higher in the air and then make sure it 'sees' the transmitting antenna from the station. If you cannot establish 'line of sight' then multi-path will always be part of your reception. Ed Light wrote: Is it ok to ask about FM Stereo antennas here? I'm running this Radio Shack 6-element FM antenna for a station at 107.3 http://www.radioshack.com/product.as...t%5Fid=15-2163 Usually it's clear in mono but not in stereo. Sometimes it's distorted in mono. Would a Delphi QFM-9 be much stronger and maybe clear this up? http://starkelectronic.com/fmpage.htm 3rd one down Thanks in advance. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I suspect your problem is that the antenna is seeing a signal that has
some components from reflections off of other building, hills, ridges, etc. It is called multi-path. My first approach would be to get the antenna higher in the air and then make sure it 'sees' the transmitting antenna from the station. If you cannot establish 'line of sight' then multi-path will always be part of your reception. Ed Light wrote: Is it ok to ask about FM Stereo antennas here? I'm running this Radio Shack 6-element FM antenna for a station at 107.3 http://www.radioshack.com/product.as...t%5Fid=15-2163 Usually it's clear in mono but not in stereo. Sometimes it's distorted in mono. Would a Delphi QFM-9 be much stronger and maybe clear this up? http://starkelectronic.com/fmpage.htm 3rd one down Thanks in advance. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed:
Dave is correct in that selecting the correct antenna depends on identifying the problem first. For example, if the actual problem is receiver front end overload, then a higher gain antenna will make it worse instead of better. If the problem is reflections (and sorry, Dave, LOS is not necessarily reflection free, I used to have to look at the local TV stations between two elevated water towers, LOS with two ghosts), then antenna pattern, rather than gain alone will matter. If you want an engineering evaluation, then a whole bunch of facts are needed, and the two facts which are needed most will be hard to come by: 1. A spectrum analyzer shot of what appears at the receiver end of your feedline, plus 2. A audio frequency phase analysis of the detected signal to determine main and delayed content. -- Crazy George Remove N O and S P A M imbedded in return address |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed:
Dave is correct in that selecting the correct antenna depends on identifying the problem first. For example, if the actual problem is receiver front end overload, then a higher gain antenna will make it worse instead of better. If the problem is reflections (and sorry, Dave, LOS is not necessarily reflection free, I used to have to look at the local TV stations between two elevated water towers, LOS with two ghosts), then antenna pattern, rather than gain alone will matter. If you want an engineering evaluation, then a whole bunch of facts are needed, and the two facts which are needed most will be hard to come by: 1. A spectrum analyzer shot of what appears at the receiver end of your feedline, plus 2. A audio frequency phase analysis of the detected signal to determine main and delayed content. -- Crazy George Remove N O and S P A M imbedded in return address |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can't move the antenna in this trailer park, so my only option is a bigger
one. The signal has cleared up the past couple of days, and I'm hoping it's more than the weather. The transmitter is about 30 miles away behind some mountains. I'm pointed at an aluminum building that's in the next lot. The receiver sees the station as "dx" rather than local. -- Ed Light Smiley :-/ MS Smiley :-\ Send spam to the FTC at Thanks, robots. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can't move the antenna in this trailer park, so my only option is a bigger
one. The signal has cleared up the past couple of days, and I'm hoping it's more than the weather. The transmitter is about 30 miles away behind some mountains. I'm pointed at an aluminum building that's in the next lot. The receiver sees the station as "dx" rather than local. -- Ed Light Smiley :-/ MS Smiley :-\ Send spam to the FTC at Thanks, robots. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed:
I would sure try different orientations first. Having to use a reflected signal is indicative of a poor path, of course. See if there is another direction which gives more reliable stereo decoding, which may not necessarily be the strongest signal. Stereo decoding is indicative of the fewest multipath contributions, and may be in a different direction entirely. Also, try changing the polarization of the antenna, although making it vertical will be difficult, as running a mast and feedline in the same plane as the elements will pretty much destroy the performance. It will likely need a mounting which is mechanically impractical in your situation. -- Crazy George Remove N O and S P A M imbedded in return address |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed:
I would sure try different orientations first. Having to use a reflected signal is indicative of a poor path, of course. See if there is another direction which gives more reliable stereo decoding, which may not necessarily be the strongest signal. Stereo decoding is indicative of the fewest multipath contributions, and may be in a different direction entirely. Also, try changing the polarization of the antenna, although making it vertical will be difficult, as running a mast and feedline in the same plane as the elements will pretty much destroy the performance. It will likely need a mounting which is mechanically impractical in your situation. -- Crazy George Remove N O and S P A M imbedded in return address |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Call for a *practical* design for a 5 or 6 element wideband yagi using a hertz dipole as DE | Antenna | |||
Simple practical designing with antenna modeling programs | Antenna | |||
Scaling yagi antennas | Antenna | |||
VHF yagi element diameter | Antenna | |||
Delphi QFM-9 vs RS 6-element for FM Stereo? | Antenna |