Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hans K0HB wrote:
http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/...service_1.html Yep, sadly it's becoming a reality. Personally, I'm looking forward to the day when I program my electronic keyer into a CQ loop, fire up the amp and leave on a vacation. Of course, the next logical step is the FCC protecting the BPL by placing amateur radio in part 15. WA7AA -- Anti-spam measu look me up on qrz.com if you need to reply directly |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hans K0HB wrote:
http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/...service_1.html Yep, sadly it's becoming a reality. Personally, I'm looking forward to the day when I program my electronic keyer into a CQ loop, fire up the amp and leave on a vacation. Of course, the next logical step is the FCC protecting the BPL by placing amateur radio in part 15. WA7AA -- Anti-spam measu look me up on qrz.com if you need to reply directly |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Was there ever any doubt that it would get the go ahead?
This administration will approve just about anything if someone makes a campaign contribution. Just look at relaxing media ownership regulations. Joe |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Was there ever any doubt that it would get the go ahead?
This administration will approve just about anything if someone makes a campaign contribution. Just look at relaxing media ownership regulations. Joe |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There will be so much capital investment by companies in BPL that the
courts won't dare to overturn the decision!!!! The FCC will cave to the $$$ interest, if they have not already done so. The answer may be to establish local HF nets, need to be local to keep S/N ratios high, and get on the air during peak internet times and simply shut down the BPL service at the consumer level. Let the consumers complain about poor service. Then provide the defense of non-licensed Part 15 devices etc. Running 1 KW as the minimum power necessary to communicate across town on 75 phone will certainly have an impact on local BPL users!!! DD Zoran Brlecic wrote: Hans K0HB wrote: http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/...service_1.html Yep, sadly it's becoming a reality. Personally, I'm looking forward to the day when I program my electronic keyer into a CQ loop, fire up the amp and leave on a vacation. Of course, the next logical step is the FCC protecting the BPL by placing amateur radio in part 15. WA7AA |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There will be so much capital investment by companies in BPL that the
courts won't dare to overturn the decision!!!! The FCC will cave to the $$$ interest, if they have not already done so. The answer may be to establish local HF nets, need to be local to keep S/N ratios high, and get on the air during peak internet times and simply shut down the BPL service at the consumer level. Let the consumers complain about poor service. Then provide the defense of non-licensed Part 15 devices etc. Running 1 KW as the minimum power necessary to communicate across town on 75 phone will certainly have an impact on local BPL users!!! DD Zoran Brlecic wrote: Hans K0HB wrote: http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/...service_1.html Yep, sadly it's becoming a reality. Personally, I'm looking forward to the day when I program my electronic keyer into a CQ loop, fire up the amp and leave on a vacation. Of course, the next logical step is the FCC protecting the BPL by placing amateur radio in part 15. WA7AA |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.radio.amateur.dx Dave Shrader wrote:
There will be so much capital investment by companies in BPL that the courts won't dare to overturn the decision!!!! The FCC will cave to the $$$ interest, if they have not already done so. They have. Mikey Powell was just in Raleigh (where I am) talking to the public, and the paper quoted him on the BPL issue among others. I don't have the exact quote but he basically said, "We'll try not to harm hobbyists, but BPL has too much potential (*) to let it be stopped." (*) "Potential" = "people are going to get RICH on this." _______________________________________________ Ken Kuzenski AC4RD kuzen001 at acpub .duke .edu _______________________________________________ All disclaimers apply, see? www.duke.edu/~kuzen001 |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.radio.amateur.dx Dave Shrader wrote:
There will be so much capital investment by companies in BPL that the courts won't dare to overturn the decision!!!! The FCC will cave to the $$$ interest, if they have not already done so. They have. Mikey Powell was just in Raleigh (where I am) talking to the public, and the paper quoted him on the BPL issue among others. I don't have the exact quote but he basically said, "We'll try not to harm hobbyists, but BPL has too much potential (*) to let it be stopped." (*) "Potential" = "people are going to get RICH on this." _______________________________________________ Ken Kuzenski AC4RD kuzen001 at acpub .duke .edu _______________________________________________ All disclaimers apply, see? www.duke.edu/~kuzen001 |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now thats a good idea. Kinda like retro radio. From what I heard, during
the days of King Spark, it took KW levels to be heard in the next town. Lets go for it. We can send traffic to each part of the country via the National Traffic System...them set up short and long range relay stations. Dang...just like it was in the beginning. I like it. Dan/W4NTI "Dave Shrader" wrote in message news:fJi2c.58122$PR3.1057825@attbi_s03... There will be so much capital investment by companies in BPL that the courts won't dare to overturn the decision!!!! The FCC will cave to the $$$ interest, if they have not already done so. The answer may be to establish local HF nets, need to be local to keep S/N ratios high, and get on the air during peak internet times and simply shut down the BPL service at the consumer level. Let the consumers complain about poor service. Then provide the defense of non-licensed Part 15 devices etc. Running 1 KW as the minimum power necessary to communicate across town on 75 phone will certainly have an impact on local BPL users!!! DD Zoran Brlecic wrote: Hans K0HB wrote: http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/...service_1.html Yep, sadly it's becoming a reality. Personally, I'm looking forward to the day when I program my electronic keyer into a CQ loop, fire up the amp and leave on a vacation. Of course, the next logical step is the FCC protecting the BPL by placing amateur radio in part 15. WA7AA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TV antenna question.......... | Antenna | |||
Be the first on your block! | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |