Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
All things being equal..what is the difference between a 3 mile rated
frs/GMRS and 6 mile GRS/GMRSrated 2 way radio when both employ 500mw power? Does the fact that one is a tiny bigger, an inch longer on the antenna, 4 AAA batteries instead of 3AAA make one better than the other or is 500MW Just 500MW jeff |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jeff wrote: All things being equal..what is the difference between a 3 mile rated frs/GMRS and 6 mile GRS/GMRSrated 2 way radio when both employ 500mw power? Impossible to say accurately without actually studying the two radios. There may actually be significant differences in performance. Or, there may be no significant difference in performance, and the only distinction between the "3 mile" and "6 mile" radios was the amount of nitrous that the marketing/advertising people were huffing when they designed the packaging materials. Does the fact that one is a tiny bigger, an inch longer on the antenna, 4 AAA batteries instead of 3AAA make one better than the other Possibly. Possibly not. All else being equal, a radio with more (or heftier) batteries may have a longer useful run time than a similar radio with fewer/smaller batteries of the same type. I tend to prefer AA-cell radios over AAA-cell for this reason, although the AA-cell type are becoming harder and harder to find. or is 500MW Just 500MW To a first approximation, radios with similar transmit power, and similar receiver sensitivities, and similar antenna designs would be expected to deliver similar range. Without actually testing the two models of radio under somewhat- controlled conditions, and/or tearing them apart, there's no way to know for sure whether there are significant performance differences. The thing to remember is that FRS was set up to be a short-range radio system - the power limit on transmission, and the requirement that the antennas have no directional gain (above that of a halfwave dipole) and be non-detachable make it clear that the FCC did not intend FRS to be a long-distance radio system. I've only ever seen one FRS radio whose performance was markedly worse than any other's. It's a cheap little "wear around the neck" model whose antenna barely protrudes from the case at all... and I suspect that the short and obstructed antenna is probably the cause of its poorer range. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
But these radios are also GMRS too. Does that mean on the lesser priced
models, GMRS can be powered by as little as 500MW too? jeff "Dave Platt" wrote in message ... In article , Jeff wrote: All things being equal..what is the difference between a 3 mile rated frs/GMRS and 6 mile GRS/GMRSrated 2 way radio when both employ 500mw power? Impossible to say accurately without actually studying the two radios. There may actually be significant differences in performance. Or, there may be no significant difference in performance, and the only distinction between the "3 mile" and "6 mile" radios was the amount of nitrous that the marketing/advertising people were huffing when they designed the packaging materials. Does the fact that one is a tiny bigger, an inch longer on the antenna, 4 AAA batteries instead of 3AAA make one better than the other Possibly. Possibly not. All else being equal, a radio with more (or heftier) batteries may have a longer useful run time than a similar radio with fewer/smaller batteries of the same type. I tend to prefer AA-cell radios over AAA-cell for this reason, although the AA-cell type are becoming harder and harder to find. or is 500MW Just 500MW To a first approximation, radios with similar transmit power, and similar receiver sensitivities, and similar antenna designs would be expected to deliver similar range. Without actually testing the two models of radio under somewhat- controlled conditions, and/or tearing them apart, there's no way to know for sure whether there are significant performance differences. The thing to remember is that FRS was set up to be a short-range radio system - the power limit on transmission, and the requirement that the antennas have no directional gain (above that of a halfwave dipole) and be non-detachable make it clear that the FCC did not intend FRS to be a long-distance radio system. I've only ever seen one FRS radio whose performance was markedly worse than any other's. It's a cheap little "wear around the neck" model whose antenna barely protrudes from the case at all... and I suspect that the short and obstructed antenna is probably the cause of its poorer range. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jeff wrote: But these radios are also GMRS too. Does that mean on the lesser priced models, GMRS can be powered by as little as 500MW too? That is exactly right. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In order to remain within the law, most GMRS/FRS radios can't use external
antennas in order to make the 500 mW erp rule. So, if you reduced power to FRS levels and use the built in, not removable antenna on the FRS channels. it is short (really short) range. Option 2 is to go and get your GMRS license. Then get a handheld that puts out the FULL 5 watts AND has a removeable antenna. Read over the rules as to power output (EIRP) allowed. Set up an external antenna with a max height of I think 20 feet above an existing structure(again check rules on this figure) Take into account antenna gain, cable loss and ACTUAL transmitter output to figure ERP. This is considered to be a Small Base Station according to the rules AND is fully legal to interopreate with FRS radios. The higher external antenna is almost guaranteed to quintuple your coverage area from base to FRS handheld. 2 base stations with directional antennas(again watching erp) would be really reliable. Chris KC2BZH "Dave Platt" wrote in message ... In article , Jeff wrote: But these radios are also GMRS too. Does that mean on the lesser priced models, GMRS can be powered by as little as 500MW too? That is exactly right. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stupid question G5RV | Antenna | |||
transmitter question - its a dousy | Homebrew | |||
transmitter question - its a dousy | Homebrew | |||
transmitter question - its a dousy | Equipment |