Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have obtained some surplus linear regulated power supplies. The
date code for the electrolytic caps in the filter section are late 1993. I've not powered these supplies up. I know that these caps have a limited life. These caps are also harder to come by due to the proliferation of switch mode power supplies and their lower values. Any ideas/suggestions to minimize stress to these caps or even rejuvinate, if possible, these caps. I'm aware of inrush current at supply turn on and I plan to minimize that. Any other ideas or suggestions??? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark wrote:
I have obtained some surplus linear regulated power supplies. The date code for the electrolytic caps in the filter section are late 1993. I've not powered these supplies up. I know that these caps have a limited life. These caps are also harder to come by due to the proliferation of switch mode power supplies and their lower values. Any ideas/suggestions to minimize stress to these caps or even rejuvinate, if possible, these caps. I'm aware of inrush current at supply turn on and I plan to minimize that. Any other ideas or suggestions??? You have three choices: 1. Bring the things up slowly, on a variac. This allows the capacitors to slowly reform. 2. Bring the things up for a while with a 60W light bulb in series, then apply full power. Same basic principle, if you don't have a variac, but slower. 3. Apply full power. If any caps blow, they were marginal and should have been replaced anyway. I tend to be a fan of method #3, but I can understand the arguments in favor of the first two. But caps that are only a decade old? Don't sweat it. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark wrote:
I have obtained some surplus linear regulated power supplies. The date code for the electrolytic caps in the filter section are late 1993. I've not powered these supplies up. I know that these caps have a limited life. These caps are also harder to come by due to the proliferation of switch mode power supplies and their lower values. Any ideas/suggestions to minimize stress to these caps or even rejuvinate, if possible, these caps. I'm aware of inrush current at supply turn on and I plan to minimize that. Any other ideas or suggestions??? You have three choices: 1. Bring the things up slowly, on a variac. This allows the capacitors to slowly reform. 2. Bring the things up for a while with a 60W light bulb in series, then apply full power. Same basic principle, if you don't have a variac, but slower. 3. Apply full power. If any caps blow, they were marginal and should have been replaced anyway. I tend to be a fan of method #3, but I can understand the arguments in favor of the first two. But caps that are only a decade old? Don't sweat it. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Dorsey" wrote in message ... Mark wrote: I have obtained some surplus linear regulated power supplies. The date code for the electrolytic caps in the filter section are late 1993. I've not powered these supplies up. I know that these caps have a limited life. These caps are also harder to come by due to the proliferation of switch mode power supplies and their lower values. Any ideas/suggestions to minimize stress to these caps or even rejuvinate, if possible, these caps. I'm aware of inrush current at supply turn on and I plan to minimize that. Any other ideas or suggestions??? You have three choices: 1. Bring the things up slowly, on a variac. This allows the capacitors to slowly reform. 2. Bring the things up for a while with a 60W light bulb in series, then apply full power. Same basic principle, if you don't have a variac, but slower. 3. Apply full power. If any caps blow, they were marginal and should have been replaced anyway. I tend to be a fan of method #3, but I can understand the arguments in favor of the first two. But caps that are only a decade old? Don't sweat it. --scott Many manufacturers of aluminum electrolytic caps recommend they be reformed after 18 months of storage, others say 2 years, and others say 3 years. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Dorsey" wrote in message ... Mark wrote: I have obtained some surplus linear regulated power supplies. The date code for the electrolytic caps in the filter section are late 1993. I've not powered these supplies up. I know that these caps have a limited life. These caps are also harder to come by due to the proliferation of switch mode power supplies and their lower values. Any ideas/suggestions to minimize stress to these caps or even rejuvinate, if possible, these caps. I'm aware of inrush current at supply turn on and I plan to minimize that. Any other ideas or suggestions??? You have three choices: 1. Bring the things up slowly, on a variac. This allows the capacitors to slowly reform. 2. Bring the things up for a while with a 60W light bulb in series, then apply full power. Same basic principle, if you don't have a variac, but slower. 3. Apply full power. If any caps blow, they were marginal and should have been replaced anyway. I tend to be a fan of method #3, but I can understand the arguments in favor of the first two. But caps that are only a decade old? Don't sweat it. --scott Many manufacturers of aluminum electrolytic caps recommend they be reformed after 18 months of storage, others say 2 years, and others say 3 years. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Much has been written and published on the net on this topic but just
to add my two cents and perhaps summarize. I've had good luck with a variable HV DC supply. I bring up the voltage, albeit slowly, while monitoring current with a microamp meter. It's nice to watch the current gradually go lower, then I step up about another 50 volts or so then watch it go lower again until I reach the rated voltage of the cap. I let it "Cook" there for awhile then use the cap. There's a formula for the "Cook Time" based on the age of the cap. Do a net search for that one. Someone in G land I think. I have restored and recapped a lot of older HF radios this way and it has saved me a tremendous amount of cash.The new Electrolytics are a lot smaller/better but we're talking about five bucks each here. I wait till they show up at the Flea Market or local surplus outlet then scoop em up for .25 each. Oooops! Maybe I shouldn't have told you about that. Tony WA6LZH (Mark) wrote in message . com... I have obtained some surplus linear regulated power supplies. The date code for the electrolytic caps in the filter section are late 1993. I've not powered these supplies up. I know that these caps have a limited life. These caps are also harder to come by due to the proliferation of switch mode power supplies and their lower values. Any ideas/suggestions to minimize stress to these caps or even rejuvinate, if possible, these caps. I'm aware of inrush current at supply turn on and I plan to minimize that. Any other ideas or suggestions??? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Much has been written and published on the net on this topic but just
to add my two cents and perhaps summarize. I've had good luck with a variable HV DC supply. I bring up the voltage, albeit slowly, while monitoring current with a microamp meter. It's nice to watch the current gradually go lower, then I step up about another 50 volts or so then watch it go lower again until I reach the rated voltage of the cap. I let it "Cook" there for awhile then use the cap. There's a formula for the "Cook Time" based on the age of the cap. Do a net search for that one. Someone in G land I think. I have restored and recapped a lot of older HF radios this way and it has saved me a tremendous amount of cash.The new Electrolytics are a lot smaller/better but we're talking about five bucks each here. I wait till they show up at the Flea Market or local surplus outlet then scoop em up for .25 each. Oooops! Maybe I shouldn't have told you about that. Tony WA6LZH (Mark) wrote in message . com... I have obtained some surplus linear regulated power supplies. The date code for the electrolytic caps in the filter section are late 1993. I've not powered these supplies up. I know that these caps have a limited life. These caps are also harder to come by due to the proliferation of switch mode power supplies and their lower values. Any ideas/suggestions to minimize stress to these caps or even rejuvinate, if possible, these caps. I'm aware of inrush current at supply turn on and I plan to minimize that. Any other ideas or suggestions??? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've had good luck with a
variable HV DC supply. I bring up the voltage, albeit slowly, while monitoring current with a microamp meter. It's nice to watch the current gradually go lower, then I step up about another 50 volts or so then watch it go lower again until I reach the rated voltage of the cap. I let it "Cook" there for awhile then use the cap. Tony & Mark- I consider ten-year-old electrolytics to still be "new", and of a newer generation than those that established a reputation for going bad when first powered-up after being in storage. Its those thirty and forty-year-old capacitors I worry about! I have an old Eico capacitor checker with the "electric eye" indicator for leakage. The voltage is also somewhat current limited. Years ago when I was working with it, I would connect an old electrolytic to it and raise the voltage until the eye just closed. Depending on capacitance and leakage, the eye would slowly open. I would then continue raising voltage and waiting for the eye to open, until the rated voltage was reached, typically 450 volts. This is equivalent to forming a capacitor by using the variac or series light bulb. I never worried about cooking it, since there was obviously no leakage soon after full voltage was reached. I think you will find those that still have leakage after several minutes, are beyond help. (Obviously ten mfd will charge a thousand times more quickly than 10,000 mfd.) I think I'll go reform the capacitors in my capacitor checker! 73, Fred, K4DII |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've had good luck with a
variable HV DC supply. I bring up the voltage, albeit slowly, while monitoring current with a microamp meter. It's nice to watch the current gradually go lower, then I step up about another 50 volts or so then watch it go lower again until I reach the rated voltage of the cap. I let it "Cook" there for awhile then use the cap. Tony & Mark- I consider ten-year-old electrolytics to still be "new", and of a newer generation than those that established a reputation for going bad when first powered-up after being in storage. Its those thirty and forty-year-old capacitors I worry about! I have an old Eico capacitor checker with the "electric eye" indicator for leakage. The voltage is also somewhat current limited. Years ago when I was working with it, I would connect an old electrolytic to it and raise the voltage until the eye just closed. Depending on capacitance and leakage, the eye would slowly open. I would then continue raising voltage and waiting for the eye to open, until the rated voltage was reached, typically 450 volts. This is equivalent to forming a capacitor by using the variac or series light bulb. I never worried about cooking it, since there was obviously no leakage soon after full voltage was reached. I think you will find those that still have leakage after several minutes, are beyond help. (Obviously ten mfd will charge a thousand times more quickly than 10,000 mfd.) I think I'll go reform the capacitors in my capacitor checker! 73, Fred, K4DII |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA===SET OF 2 ELECTROLYTIC CAPS FOR VALVE AMP. 220uF 400V | Boatanchors | |||
FA===SET OF 2 ELECTROLYTIC CAPS FOR VALVE AMP. 220uF 400V | Boatanchors | |||
FS Electrolytic Caps | Boatanchors | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Boatanchors | |||
Electrolytic caps question | Boatanchors |