Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I need to lose about 5 dB from a 15 Watt exciter. Thanks.
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dave" wrote in message m... I need to lose about 5 dB from a 15 Watt exciter. Thanks. Simple answer is no. While you can build one with wirewound resistors , the normal formulars will not usually work at RF and you will have a lot of inductance to deal with. Even the socalled non-inductive resistors are only so at the audio frequencies. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ralph Mowery wrote:
"dave" wrote in message m... I need to lose about 5 dB from a 15 Watt exciter. Thanks. Simple answer is no. While you can build one with wirewound resistors , the normal formulars will not usually work at RF and you will have a lot of inductance to deal with. Even the socalled non-inductive resistors are only so at the audio frequencies. Can the inductive reactance be cancelled with capacitors? I'm mainly concerned with 40, 30 and 20 meters. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I need to lose about 5 dB from a 15 Watt exciter. Thanks.
Simple answer is no. While you can build one with wirewound resistors , the normal formulars will not usually work at RF and you will have a lot of inductance to deal with. Even the socalled non-inductive resistors are only so at the audio frequencies. Can the inductive reactance be cancelled with capacitors? I'm mainly concerned with 40, 30 and 20 meters. The reactance will change with frequency. Do you want to be fiddling with antenna tuners? There is a whole lot of stuff you need to know when designing and building. A good place to start is with an ARRL Handbook. They can often be found in public libraries, but they are an excellent reference on the subjects you are dealing with. I own several because even the older information is useful. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , dave
writes Ralph Mowery wrote: "dave" wrote in message news:0vqdnaEyq4zYAhfXnZ2dnUVZ_hJi4p2d@earthlink. com... I need to lose about 5 dB from a 15 Watt exciter. Thanks. Simple answer is no. While you can build one with wirewound resistors , the normal formulars will not usually work at RF and you will have a lot of inductance to deal with. Even the socalled non-inductive resistors are only so at the audio frequencies. Can the inductive reactance be cancelled with capacitors? I'm mainly concerned with 40, 30 and 20 meters. If your highest frequency is only 14MHz, and you're not trying to obtain a sooper-dooper perfect match for your exciter, then I'd say that you would certainly get away with using wirewound resistors. To minimise the effects of the inductance, you could try mounting the resistors 'hard down' against a ground plane. You might need a sheet of some insulating material to avoid any danger of shorting to it. And presumably, to get rid of 5dB (nearly 3/4 of your original 15W) you intend to use paralleled-up resistors. This in itself will help minimise the inductance. -- Ian |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.radio.amateur.equipment dave wrote:
Ralph Mowery wrote: "dave" wrote in message m... I need to lose about 5 dB from a 15 Watt exciter. Thanks. Simple answer is no. While you can build one with wirewound resistors , the normal formulars will not usually work at RF and you will have a lot of inductance to deal with. Even the socalled non-inductive resistors are only so at the audio frequencies. Can the inductive reactance be cancelled with capacitors? I'm mainly concerned with 40, 30 and 20 meters. It becomes too frequency dependant to bother with. Use a T attenuator. See: http://chemandy.com/calculators/t-at...calculator.htm You will likely have to use series or parallel combinations of resistors to get the values required anyway. You can also play with using two attnuator sectoions to see if it makes the resistor values (and wattage required) simpler. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
["Followup-To:" header set to rec.radio.amateur.equipment.]
On 2009-08-18, dave wrote: I need to lose about 5 dB from a 15 Watt exciter. Thanks. Do you really need to lose some watts? Or do you just need to reduce the voltage to whatever you are driving? Maybe a capacitive voltage divider would do what you need. Jim W6JVE -- jhhaynes at earthlink dot net |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Haynes wrote:
["Followup-To:" header set to rec.radio.amateur.equipment.] On 2009-08-18, dave wrote: I need to lose about 5 dB from a 15 Watt exciter. Thanks. Do you really need to lose some watts? Or do you just need to reduce the voltage to whatever you are driving? Maybe a capacitive voltage divider would do what you need. Jim W6JVE It's a Tokyo Hy-Power HL-45B amp, designed to be driven with a Yaesu FT-817. I'm using a "20 Watt" Argonaut V, which isn't terribly linear at 5 Watts (closer to 3 is actually what's required by the THP). |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ian Jackson" wrote in message ... In message , dave writes Ralph Mowery wrote: "dave" wrote in message news:0vqdnaEyq4zYAhfXnZ2dnUVZ_hJi4p2d@earthlink. com... I need to lose about 5 dB from a 15 Watt exciter. Thanks. Simple answer is no. While you can build one with wirewound resistors , the normal formulars will not usually work at RF and you will have a lot of inductance to deal with. Even the socalled non-inductive resistors are only so at the audio frequencies. Can the inductive reactance be cancelled with capacitors? I'm mainly concerned with 40, 30 and 20 meters. If your highest frequency is only 14MHz, and you're not trying to obtain a sooper-dooper perfect match for your exciter, then I'd say that you would certainly get away with using wirewound resistors. To minimise the effects of the inductance, you could try mounting the resistors 'hard down' against a ground plane. You might need a sheet of some insulating material to avoid any danger of shorting to it. And presumably, to get rid of 5dB (nearly 3/4 of your original 15W) you intend to use paralleled-up resistors. This in itself will help minimise the inductance. -- Ian A bunch of chip resistors in parallel to ultimately make a T-atten. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , JB
writes "Ian Jackson" wrote in message ... In message , dave writes Ralph Mowery wrote: "dave" wrote in message news:0vqdnaEyq4zYAhfXnZ2dnUVZ_hJi4p2d@earthlink. com... I need to lose about 5 dB from a 15 Watt exciter. Thanks. Simple answer is no. While you can build one with wirewound resistors , the normal formulars will not usually work at RF and you will have a lot of inductance to deal with. Even the socalled non-inductive resistors are only so at the audio frequencies. Can the inductive reactance be cancelled with capacitors? I'm mainly concerned with 40, 30 and 20 meters. If your highest frequency is only 14MHz, and you're not trying to obtain a sooper-dooper perfect match for your exciter, then I'd say that you would certainly get away with using wirewound resistors. To minimise the effects of the inductance, you could try mounting the resistors 'hard down' against a ground plane. You might need a sheet of some insulating material to avoid any danger of shorting to it. And presumably, to get rid of 5dB (nearly 3/4 of your original 15W) you intend to use paralleled-up resistors. This in itself will help minimise the inductance. -- Ian A bunch of chip resistors in parallel to ultimately make a T-atten. Yebbut.... 12W is a fair bit to dissipate with chip resistors (even a lot of them). However, the question was if you could use WW resistors, not 'how to do it properly'. I presume there was a reason why this was asked! After all, we ARE talking 'amateur' radio. -- Ian |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NRD-515 MW attenuator | Shortwave | |||
To build or not to build Part II | Homebrew | |||
Variable Attenuator | Antenna | |||
Testing an attenuator? | Antenna | |||
FA: MFJ-762 Step Attenuator NR | Swap |