Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 13:43:46 -0600, clifto wrote:
Invader3K wrote: Personally I'm looking forward to the highly increased picture quality and digital surround sound that DTV can provide. If some people want to stick with their 1950s technology, so be it; but don't hold it against those of us who want to move into the 21st century, thank you very much. Many parts of the world like Japan and Western Europe have pretty much moved to DTV already, and those countries haven't been engulfed in mobs of angry people who can't watch TV anymore. The problem isn't moving into the 21st Century, Mr. Futuristic Modern Dude. We're already there. The problem is *removing* the existing broadcasts. There'd be room for everyone if Congress wasn't so easily bought by commercial interests bent on forcing the public to throw away literally TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS worth of equipment. I'm as far from a treehugger as one can get, but have you given any thought whatever to the landfill problem when hundreds of millions of television sets suddenly need landfill for disposal? Just put the set top box in front of it and they'll work fine and that set top box is a lot cheaper than a new set. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Here comes the Digital TV disaster | Equipment | |||
Here comes the Digital TV disaster | Equipment | |||
Digital still photos from disaster sites | Digital | |||
Digital still photos from disaster sites | Digital | |||
Digital scanners online...Listen now ! | Scanner |