Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .net,
says... wrote in oups.com: wrote: On 13 Oct 2006 07:59:20 -0700, wrote: wrote: wrote: You may not agree with their suggested solutions, but you'd have to agree that we have a problem. Right? notice you have gotten no reply Having waited almost a week for a reasonable response... The silence is telling. I believe you are right, he doesn't care.. indeed and it gets worse I am sure he believes the solution is worse than the problem because it does not promote cw forever Slow Code is only here to troll. He's a fan of CW, but not a big enough fan to actually defent the continued testing of Morse Code with any valid reasoning. You see no value in being effective communicators, The most effective communication is plain english! 73 Chris |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Slow Code is a disgrace to Amateur Radio!
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:41:18 GMT, Slow Code wrote: wrote in roups.com: wrote: On 13 Oct 2006 07:59:20 -0700, wrote: wrote: wrote: You may not agree with their suggested solutions, but you'd have to agree that we have a problem. Right? notice you have gotten no reply Having waited almost a week for a reasonable response... The silence is telling. I believe you are right, he doesn't care.. indeed and it gets worse I am sure he believes the solution is worse than the problem because it does not promote cw forever Slow Code is only here to troll. He's a fan of CW, but not a big enough fan to actually defent the continued testing of Morse Code with any valid reasoning. Here's a valid reason for continued CW testing: To keep lowlifes like you and Markie out of ham radio and off HF. You're too lazy to try to be real hams. You see no value in being effective communicators, therefore you're both worthless to the service and if you had to use CW to save a life that person would die. You're both probably too lazy to use a microphone to help save anyone too. I'd like to see the No-code Tech class go away with a 5 wpm Tech the being entry level to the service, or bring back a code only Novice class again. Require 13 wpm code test for general and 20 wpm an Extra again. People that don't like it should stay on CB. Ten-Four? This should provide you and Markie a lot to stroke each other with. You both seem to sing the same tune. SC |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:45:49 -0500, john wrote:
Slow Code is a disgrace to Amateur Radio! Let Slow Code post, and "john" comes stumbling in while stepping on his crank, with both cap guns blazing. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Slow Code wrote: wrote in oups.com: wrote: On 13 Oct 2006 07:59:20 -0700, wrote: wrote: wrote: You may not agree with their suggested solutions, but you'd have to agree that we have a problem. Right? notice you have gotten no reply Having waited almost a week for a reasonable response... The silence is telling. I believe you are right, he doesn't care.. indeed and it gets worse I am sure he believes the solution is worse than the problem because it does not promote cw forever Slow Code is only here to troll. He's a fan of CW, but not a big enough fan to actually defent the continued testing of Morse Code with any valid reasoning. Here's a valid reason for continued CW testing: To keep lowlifes like you and Markie out of ham radio and off HF. You're too lazy to try to be real hams. You see no value in being effective communicators, therefore you're both worthless to the service and if you had to use CW to save a life that person would die. You're both probably too lazy to use a microphone to help save anyone too. I'd like to see the No-code Tech class go away with a 5 wpm Tech the being entry level to the service, or bring back a code only Novice class again. Require 13 wpm code test for general and 20 wpm an Extra again. People that don't like it should stay on CB. Ten-Four? This should provide you and Markie a lot to stroke each other with. You both seem to sing the same tune. SC Why do you say I'm a low-life? |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: On 17 Oct 2006 17:39:19 -0700, wrote: Slow Code wrote: wrote in oups.com: wrote: On 13 Oct 2006 07:59:20 -0700, wrote: wrote: wrote: You may not agree with their suggested solutions, but you'd have to agree that we have a problem. Right? notice you have gotten no reply Having waited almost a week for a reasonable response... The silence is telling. I believe you are right, he doesn't care.. indeed and it gets worse I am sure he believes the solution is worse than the problem because it does not promote cw forever Slow Code is only here to troll. He's a fan of CW, but not a big enough fan to actually defent the continued testing of Morse Code with any valid reasoning. Here's a valid reason for continued CW testing: To keep lowlifes like you and Markie out of ham radio and off HF. You're too lazy to try to be real hams. You see no value in being effective communicators, therefore you're both worthless to the service and if you had to use CW to save a life that person would die. You're both probably too lazy to use a microphone to help save anyone too. I'd like to see the No-code Tech class go away with a 5 wpm Tech the being entry level to the service, or bring back a code only Novice class again. Require 13 wpm code test for general and 20 wpm an Extra again. People that don't like it should stay on CB. Ten-Four? This should provide you and Markie a lot to stroke each other with. You both seem to sing the same tune. SC Why do you say I'm a low-life? according to him anyone not devoted to cw is a lowlfie That's really sad. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: wrote: Slow Code wrote: It seems to me they want to eliminate all testing. That's what happens when no-codes and nickle hams start running things. Or is that ruining things? Naw, ARRL isn't trying to do that. I haven't seen anything in their current goals that would lead me to believe that they are trying to send the rest of our spectrum the way of 11 meters. I may be wrong, but I don't think the FCC would do that again (if any of the current commissioners are students of FCC history that is) even if the ARRL suggested it. The numbers of Hams out there and how it's been dropping though the more recent years is an alarming trend. With the age of the average ham creeping higher, this hobby is set to all but die out in the USA within a generation unless something changes. indeed What an inciteful response (No...I didn't mispell that...Pun intended...) Surely you see the problem that the ARRL is trying to address. honestly I don't think he does You may not agree with their suggested solutions, but you'd have to agree that we have a problem. Right? notice you have gotten no reply He didn't get a response because : (a) His comments were concise, well written and in proper English...Traits that make it difficult for YOU to understand or "respond" to. (b) Accurate and able to stand on their own merits. Steve, K4YZ |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Papa Dog wrote in
: In article .net, says... wrote in oups.com: wrote: On 13 Oct 2006 07:59:20 -0700, wrote: wrote: wrote: You may not agree with their suggested solutions, but you'd have to agree that we have a problem. Right? notice you have gotten no reply Having waited almost a week for a reasonable response... The silence is telling. I believe you are right, he doesn't care.. indeed and it gets worse I am sure he believes the solution is worse than the problem because it does not promote cw forever Slow Code is only here to troll. He's a fan of CW, but not a big enough fan to actually defent the continued testing of Morse Code with any valid reasoning. You see no value in being effective communicators, The most effective communication is plain english! 73 Chris Yes you're right, unless you're trying to pass a message through someone that doesn't know how to speak english. CW is a wonderful thing. Real communicators know CW and know how to use it. SC |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in
ps.com: Slow Code wrote: wrote in oups.com: wrote: On 13 Oct 2006 07:59:20 -0700, wrote: wrote: wrote: You may not agree with their suggested solutions, but you'd have to agree that we have a problem. Right? notice you have gotten no reply Having waited almost a week for a reasonable response... The silence is telling. I believe you are right, he doesn't care.. indeed and it gets worse I am sure he believes the solution is worse than the problem because it does not promote cw forever Slow Code is only here to troll. He's a fan of CW, but not a big enough fan to actually defent the continued testing of Morse Code with any valid reasoning. Here's a valid reason for continued CW testing: To keep lowlifes like you and Markie out of ham radio and off HF. You're too lazy to try to be real hams. You see no value in being effective communicators, therefore you're both worthless to the service and if you had to use CW to save a life that person would die. You're both probably too lazy to use a microphone to help save anyone too. I'd like to see the No-code Tech class go away with a 5 wpm Tech the being entry level to the service, or bring back a code only Novice class again. Require 13 wpm code test for general and 20 wpm an Extra again. People that don't like it should stay on CB. Ten-Four? This should provide you and Markie a lot to stroke each other with. You both seem to sing the same tune. SC Why do you say I'm a low-life? Did I say low-life? I meant to say lazy. SC |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Slow Code is the kind of guy that everybodys hates on the air. He is
the Jammer because no one listens to him. On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:13:24 GMT, Slow Code wrote: Papa Dog wrote in : In article .net, says... wrote in oups.com: wrote: On 13 Oct 2006 07:59:20 -0700, wrote: wrote: wrote: You may not agree with their suggested solutions, but you'd have to agree that we have a problem. Right? notice you have gotten no reply Having waited almost a week for a reasonable response... The silence is telling. I believe you are right, he doesn't care.. indeed and it gets worse I am sure he believes the solution is worse than the problem because it does not promote cw forever Slow Code is only here to troll. He's a fan of CW, but not a big enough fan to actually defent the continued testing of Morse Code with any valid reasoning. You see no value in being effective communicators, The most effective communication is plain english! 73 Chris Yes you're right, unless you're trying to pass a message through someone that doesn't know how to speak english. CW is a wonderful thing. Real communicators know CW and know how to use it. SC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
hey BB did steve do somethign specail toy uo laely? | Policy | |||
The Death of Amateur Radio | Policy | |||
More News of Radio Amateurs' Work in the Andamans | Shortwave | |||
Amateurs Handle Emergency Comms in Wake of Hurricane Ivan | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy |