"Slow Code" wrote in message
link.net...
'Mark in the Dark' wrote in
:

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:27:10 -0500, "Not Lloyd" anon@anon wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 04:51:46 GMT, Papa Dog
wrote:

That was a GREAT post!!!!!!!
she si fine for words pity that from experence I know she does not
walk the talk
..........

There you go again, Mark. Commenting where no comment was due.
why was no coment due?

Dee flint's psting history contains many occasions of her reffering to
the lessor ham lesser classes of ham etc


Dee is right.
You are a lesser class of ham Mark in the Dark. In fact, you have no
class at all.

SC

By the way, I've never referred to any person as being a lesser or lower
class than another. He is unable to differentiate between personal
descriptions and regulatory use of terms such as Technicians being a lower
class of LICENSE than Generals. He seems to think references of regulatory
distinctions are the same as referring to persons.

Dee, N8UZE

Mark in the Dark' wrote in
:

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:16:19 -0400, "Dee Flint"
wrote:


"Slow Code" wrote in message
thlink.net...
'Mark in the Dark' wrote in
:

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:27:10 -0500, "Not Lloyd" anon@anon wrote:


wrote in message
om...
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 04:51:46 GMT, Papa Dog
wrote:

That was a GREAT post!!!!!!!
she si fine for words pity that from experence I know she does not
walk the talk
..........

There you go again, Mark. Commenting where no comment was due.
why was no coment due?

Dee flint's psting history contains many occasions of her reffering
to the lessor ham lesser classes of ham etc


Dee is right.
You are a lesser class of ham Mark in the Dark. In fact, you have no
class at all.

SC

By the way, I've never referred to any person as being a lesser or lower
class than another.
stop your lying dee flint you chose to refer to 300,00 people as
lessor hams then refuse to apoligize for or even adknowledge why
someone might be offended
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/


But they are a lesser class, Mark in the Dark. The more exams you take
and pass, the harder you work, the farther up the ladder you go.

The problem you have Mark, is that you're so lazy people have to slap your
silly ass off the ladder so they can climb up. You're against having good
hams.

SC

"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...
Mark in the Dark' wrote in
:

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:16:19 -0400, "Dee Flint"
wrote:


"Slow Code" wrote in message
rthlink.net...
'Mark in the Dark' wrote in
:

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:27:10 -0500, "Not Lloyd" anon@anon wrote:


wrote in message
news:klulj2tcmkejnh69l3blguhf5j5r5u2uop@4ax. com...
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 04:51:46 GMT, Papa Dog
wrote:

That was a GREAT post!!!!!!!
she si fine for words pity that from experence I know she does not
walk the talk
..........

There you go again, Mark. Commenting where no comment was due.
why was no coment due?

Dee flint's psting history contains many occasions of her reffering
to the lessor ham lesser classes of ham etc


Dee is right.
You are a lesser class of ham Mark in the Dark. In fact, you have no
class at all.

SC

By the way, I've never referred to any person as being a lesser or lower
class than another.
stop your lying dee flint you chose to refer to 300,00 people as
lessor hams then refuse to apoligize for or even adknowledge why
someone might be offended
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/


But they are a lesser class, Mark in the Dark. The more exams you take
and pass, the harder you work, the farther up the ladder you go.

The problem you have Mark, is that you're so lazy people have to slap your
silly ass off the ladder so they can climb up. You're against having good
hams.

SC

As you can see, he is unable to separate license classes from people. I
referred only to the licenses not the people. He seems to think that a
definition of the license is also a definition of the person. That is
absolutely inane. Afterall most of us, including myself, hold a standard
driver's license. It is a lower class license than a chauffer's license,
CDL B, or CDL A. None of us are "insulted" by the fact the we hold a lower
class license.

Dee, N8UZE

Mark in the Dark' wrote in
:

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:17:07 -0400, "Dee Flint"
wrote:


"Slow Code" wrote in message

SC

As you can see, he is unable to separate license classes from people.

no you lack that skill I
referred only to the licenses not the people. He seems to think that a
definition of the license is also a definition of the person. That is
absolutely inane. Afterall most of us, including myself, hold a
standard driver's license. It is a lower class license than a
chauffer's license, CDL B, or CDL A. None of us are "insulted" by the
fact the we hold a lower class license.
but you would if also told that your lower class was the result of
being lazy you do not understand the subject of CoNTEXT it is a word
you should try learning


But you are lazy Mark in the Dark, you refuse to do what it takes to
upgrade. You're waiting for the FCC hand-out licenses.

SC