Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This will give no-codes motivation to study more about radio if they want
to continue to be a radio amateur. This helps new no-codes coming in because the old no-codes that are studying will know more and be better elmers to the new ones. SC |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 23:42:48 GMT, Slow Code wrote:
This will give no-codes motivation to study more about radio if they want to continue to be a radio amateur. This helps new no-codes coming in because the old no-codes that are studying will know more and be better elmers to the new ones. why is it that you want to kill the ARS SC http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This will give no-codes motivation to study more about radio if they want
to continue to be a radio amateur. This helps new no-codes coming in because the old no-codes that are studying will know more and be better elmers to the new ones. Yeah, and waste call signs on people who most likely wont learn code. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 05:17:40 -0700, "10-4 Good Buddy"
wrote: This will give no-codes motivation to study more about radio if they want to continue to be a radio amateur. This helps new no-codes coming in because the old no-codes that are studying will know more and be better elmers to the new ones. Yeah, and waste call signs on people who most likely wont learn code. why do you hate the ARS SC? http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"10-4 Good Buddy" wrote in
: This will give no-codes motivation to study more about radio if they want to continue to be a radio amateur. This helps new no-codes coming in because the old no-codes that are studying will know more and be better elmers to the new ones. Yeah, and waste call signs on people who most likely wont learn code. No, The one year non-renewable no-code hams would be issued callsigns from the old CB callsign blocks of the mid 1970's. After they pass the code test they get a real ham call unless they prefer to keep using the CB one. SC |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Slow Code wrote: "10-4 Good Buddy" wrote in : This will give no-codes motivation to study more about radio if they want to continue to be a radio amateur. This helps new no-codes coming in because the old no-codes that are studying will know more and be better elmers to the new ones. Yeah, and waste call signs on people who most likely wont learn code. No, The one year non-renewable no-code hams would be issued callsigns from the old CB callsign blocks of the mid 1970's. After they pass the code test they get a real ham call unless they prefer to keep using the CB one. what is it with your obession with CB? SC |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mark in the Dark" wrote in
ups.com: Slow Code wrote: "10-4 Good Buddy" wrote in : This will give no-codes motivation to study more about radio if they want to continue to be a radio amateur. This helps new no-codes coming in because the old no-codes that are studying will know more and be better elmers to the new ones. Yeah, and waste call signs on people who most likely wont learn code. No, The one year non-renewable no-code hams would be issued callsigns from the old CB callsign blocks of the mid 1970's. After they pass the code test they get a real ham call unless they prefer to keep using the CB one. what is it with your obession with CB? CB'ers = Untested = No-code = No Skills. Ten-Four? SC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio? | Policy | |||
Scorecard on WT Docket 05-235 | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
Trade Modded DX-398 For Scanner | Shortwave | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy |