Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22 Mar 2007 18:09:42 -0700, an_old_friend Hairy Palms wrote:
On Mar 22, 9:07 pm, "Larry" wrote: On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:13:56 -0500, Mork anon@anon wrote: Yes indeed. Mark is finally getting the jacking that he's been looking for. Jacked off Usenet at last nope lying so another thread How many times a day do you do that? I'll bet that the palms of your hands are growing hair. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 22, 9:24 pm, "Larry" wrote:
On 22 Mar 2007 18:09:42 -0700, an_old_friend Hairy Palms wrote: On Mar 22, 9:07 pm, "Larry" wrote: On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:13:56 -0500, Mork anon@anon wrote: Yes indeed. Mark is finally getting the jacking that he's been looking for. Jacked off Usenet at last nope lying so another thread How many times a day do you do that? where is your evdence that I have hijacked a legit thread |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... On Mar 22, 9:24 pm, "Larry" wrote: On 22 Mar 2007 18:09:42 -0700, an_old_friend Hairy Palms wrote: On Mar 22, 9:07 pm, "Larry" wrote: On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:13:56 -0500, Mork anon@anon wrote: Yes indeed. Mark is finally getting the jacking that he's been looking for. Jacked off Usenet at last nope lying so another thread How many times a day do you do that? where is your evdence that I have hijacked a legit thread You don't get to define what a legitimate thread is. You are not a moderator. only in your dreams, Mork. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 22, 11:24 pm, "Mork" anon@anon wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... On Mar 22, 9:24 pm, "Larry" wrote: On 22 Mar 2007 18:09:42 -0700, an_old_friend Hairy Palms wrote: On Mar 22, 9:07 pm, "Larry" wrote: On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:13:56 -0500, Mork anon@anon wrote: Yes indeed. Mark is finally getting the jacking that he's been looking for. Jacked off Usenet at last nope lying so another thread How many times a day do you do that? where is your evdence that I have hijacked a legit thread You don't get to define what a legitimate thread is. why not You are not a moderator. neither are you but you choose to define it |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... On Mar 22, 11:24 pm, "Mork" anon@anon wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... On Mar 22, 9:24 pm, "Larry" wrote: On 22 Mar 2007 18:09:42 -0700, an_old_friend Hairy Palms wrote: On Mar 22, 9:07 pm, "Larry" wrote: On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:13:56 -0500, Mork anon@anon wrote: Yes indeed. Mark is finally getting the jacking that he's been looking for. Jacked off Usenet at last nope lying so another thread How many times a day do you do that? where is your evdence that I have hijacked a legit thread You don't get to define what a legitimate thread is. why not You are not a moderator. neither are you but you choose to define it Not hardly. You are the one telling others they are off topic. You are taking it upon yourself to determine which threads are legitimate. You have no right, nor the intellect. You are simply compelled to "get the last word". Your O/C disorder shines through, Morkie. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... On Mar 22, 11:24 pm, "Mork" anon@anon wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... On Mar 22, 9:24 pm, "Larry" wrote: On 22 Mar 2007 18:09:42 -0700, an_old_friend Hairy Palms wrote: On Mar 22, 9:07 pm, "Larry" wrote: On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:13:56 -0500, Mork anon@anon wrote: Yes indeed. Mark is finally getting the jacking that he's been looking for. Jacked off Usenet at last nope lying so another thread How many times a day do you do that? where is your evdence that I have hijacked a legit thread You don't get to define what a legitimate thread is. why not You are not a moderator. neither are you but you choose to define it Not defining it. Just reminding YOU that YOU do not get to define it, despite your many attempts. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 23, 12:08 am, "Mork" anon@anon wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... On Mar 22, 11:24 pm, "Mork" anon@anon wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message roups.com... On Mar 22, 9:24 pm, "Larry" wrote: On 22 Mar 2007 18:09:42 -0700, an_old_friend Hairy Palms wrote: On Mar 22, 9:07 pm, "Larry" wrote: On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:13:56 -0500, Mork anon@anon wrote: Yes indeed. Mark is finally getting the jacking that he's been looking for. Jacked off Usenet at last nope lying so another thread How many times a day do you do that? where is your evdence that I have hijacked a legit thread You don't get to define what a legitimate thread is. why not You are not a moderator. neither are you but you choose to define it Not defining it. lying a agin but at least for once you did not thread jack the title now if you could stay on topic for once |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message news ![]() On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 23:07:35 -0500, "Mork" anon@anon wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message roups.com... On Mar 22, 11:24 pm, "Mork" anon@anon wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message where is your evdence that I have hijacked a legit thread You don't get to define what a legitimate thread is. why not no answer You are not a moderator. neither are you but you choose to define it Not hardly. You are the one telling others they are off topic. yes I am You are taking it upon yourself to determine which threads are legitimate. why not? You have no right,........ every right ............ nor the intellect. how much intelect does it take to know that my sex is off topic for a radio NG? Read this group again. And again. Nobody, nobody, mentioned sex save for you. Apparently you are either a stuck record, or you have a guilty conscience. only in your dreams, Morkie. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 23, 7:45?am, wrote:
where is your evdence that I have hijacked a legit thread Mark here is evidence of your thread hijacking: Here poster Larry posted a legitimate post that the moderated group may produce better results for newbie questions. Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc, rec.radio.amateur.policy From: "Larry" Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Local: Fri, Mar 16 2007 5:04 pm Subject: NEWCOMERS: Use rec.radio.amateur.moderated instead of this group. Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author The new rec.radio.amateur.moderated news group is spam and flame free and is a much better place to ask your questions. If your news server doesn't carry rec.radio.amateur.moderated, you can go to Google Groups and post from there. Sadly, posts to this news group are much less likely to produce useful results for you. Then in the next post you (Mark Morgan) hijacked the thread, what part don't you understand about your thread jacking? Discussion subject changed to "only in your dreams woger" by an_old_friend Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc, rec.radio.amateur.policy From: "an_old_friend" Date: 16 Mar 2007 14:31:49 -0700 Local: Fri, Mar 16 2007 5:31 pm Subject: only in your dreams woger Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author On Mar 16, 5:04 pm, "Larry" wrote: only porblem with this ng is you woger Evidence that you (Mark Morgan) hijack threads, and don't come back and say that this is not a radio related thread as your rationale, because it was related to the radio groups, and it was posted in the proper forum .misc, (meaning everything not covered by the other forums). BTW stay off of my blog and stop stalking me, pervert. Dloyd |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Has someone "hi-jacked " the rec.radio use groups?? | Boatanchors | |||
Problems with this usenet | Shortwave |