| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
September 23rd 03, 06:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Theoretical Question
Hello!
Can someone point out any mistakes in the following conclusion? I'm just trying to find out if my understanding of stuff is correct. If I transmit a signal at a frequency of 2.4 GHz (2 400 000 000 Hz), the wavelength of that signal is 12.5 cm (speed of light/frequency in Hz). One wavelength can transport one bit of information in one wave length. In one second the signal travels ~300 000 km (speed of light). So I have 2 400 000 000 waves per second, which translates to 2 400 000 000 Bit per second. This translates to a "raw" throughput of ~2289 MBit / s. This seems to be a bit high looking at current gear on the market, but I guess much gets lost in error detection/recovery and stuff. Anyways, can any of you pros take a short look on it and point out any mistakes I made? cheers Mike |
|
#2
September 23rd 03, 06:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I DONT CARE WHAT FREQUENCY YOU TRANSMIT ON AS LONG AS ITS NOT 3894.5. THAT
IS MINE MINE MINE BECAUSE MINE IS BIGGER THAN YOURS. "Michael Ransburg" wrote in message om... Hello! Can someone point out any mistakes in the following conclusion? I'm just trying to find out if my understanding of stuff is correct. If I transmit a signal at a frequency of 2.4 GHz (2 400 000 000 Hz), the wavelength of that signal is 12.5 cm (speed of light/frequency in Hz). One wavelength can transport one bit of information in one wave length. In one second the signal travels ~300 000 km (speed of light). So I have 2 400 000 000 waves per second, which translates to 2 400 000 000 Bit per second. This translates to a "raw" throughput of ~2289 MBit / s. This seems to be a bit high looking at current gear on the market, but I guess much gets lost in error detection/recovery and stuff. Anyways, can any of you pros take a short look on it and point out any mistakes I made? cheers Mike |
|
#3
September 23rd 03, 06:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I DONT CARE WHAT FREQUENCY YOU TRANSMIT ON AS LONG AS ITS NOT 3894.5. THAT
IS MINE MINE MINE BECAUSE MINE IS BIGGER THAN YOURS. "Michael Ransburg" wrote in message om... Hello! Can someone point out any mistakes in the following conclusion? I'm just trying to find out if my understanding of stuff is correct. If I transmit a signal at a frequency of 2.4 GHz (2 400 000 000 Hz), the wavelength of that signal is 12.5 cm (speed of light/frequency in Hz). One wavelength can transport one bit of information in one wave length. In one second the signal travels ~300 000 km (speed of light). So I have 2 400 000 000 waves per second, which translates to 2 400 000 000 Bit per second. This translates to a "raw" throughput of ~2289 MBit / s. This seems to be a bit high looking at current gear on the market, but I guess much gets lost in error detection/recovery and stuff. Anyways, can any of you pros take a short look on it and point out any mistakes I made? cheers Mike |
|
#4
September 24th 03, 12:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"BIGAL" wrote in message ...
I DONT CARE WHAT FREQUENCY YOU TRANSMIT ON AS LONG AS ITS NOT 3894.5. THAT IS MINE MINE MINE BECAUSE MINE IS BIGGER THAN YOURS. Wow, I managed to find the troll trigger with my very first post to this group. That's nice =) Unfortunately, your attempt to troll was neither funny nor intelligent, so I'll only give you a 2 on the troll-o-meter, but please keep trying, I'll happily re-evaluate your performance at any given time  |
|
#5
September 24th 03, 12:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"BIGAL" wrote in message ...
I DONT CARE WHAT FREQUENCY YOU TRANSMIT ON AS LONG AS ITS NOT 3894.5. THAT IS MINE MINE MINE BECAUSE MINE IS BIGGER THAN YOURS. Wow, I managed to find the troll trigger with my very first post to this group. That's nice =) Unfortunately, your attempt to troll was neither funny nor intelligent, so I'll only give you a 2 on the troll-o-meter, but please keep trying, I'll happily re-evaluate your performance at any given time |
|
#6
September 24th 03, 07:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Michael Ransburg" wrote in message om... "BIGAL" wrote in message ... I DONT CARE WHAT FREQUENCY YOU TRANSMIT ON AS LONG AS ITS NOT 3894.5. THAT IS MINE MINE MINE BECAUSE MINE IS BIGGER THAN YOURS. Wow, I managed to find the troll trigger with my very first post to this group. That's nice =) Unfortunately, your attempt to troll was neither funny nor intelligent, so I'll only give you a 2 on the troll-o-meter, but please keep trying, I'll happily re-evaluate your performance at any given time I RE-EVALUATED YOUR MOTHERS PERFORMANCE LAST NIGHT. |
|
#7
September 24th 03, 07:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Michael Ransburg" wrote in message om... "BIGAL" wrote in message ... I DONT CARE WHAT FREQUENCY YOU TRANSMIT ON AS LONG AS ITS NOT 3894.5. THAT IS MINE MINE MINE BECAUSE MINE IS BIGGER THAN YOURS. Wow, I managed to find the troll trigger with my very first post to this group. That's nice =) Unfortunately, your attempt to troll was neither funny nor intelligent, so I'll only give you a 2 on the troll-o-meter, but please keep trying, I'll happily re-evaluate your performance at any given time I RE-EVALUATED YOUR MOTHERS PERFORMANCE LAST NIGHT. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Stacking Distance Question. More Information | Antenna | |||
| Stupid question G5RV | Antenna | |||
| transmitter question - its a dousy | Equipment | |||
| transmitter question - its a dousy | Homebrew | |||
| Question about attenuators ... | Antenna | |||
Linear Mode
