LARDASS Lloyd Davies aka "Arf! Arf!"
blathered in message ...
"more lies

Here's the letter, dumb****, word for word, do see if you canb spot
the reason for the retest, beside the FCC perogative for doing so. And
note, too, that the retest was PASSED, and later the license was
upgraded. Something you haven't been able to do in over 10 years. You
couldn't pass the Technician license exam TODAY if you had to.

------------
July 11, 2000

CERTIFIED MAIL--RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Mr. Roger L. Wiseman

610 Glen Haven Avenue

Glendale, WV 26038-1302

SUBJECT: Amateur Radio license KC8JBO

Dear Mr. Wiseman:

Pursuant to Section 97.519(d)(2) of the Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R.
Section 97.519(d)(2), the Commission has the authority to
re-administer any
examination element previously administered by Volunteer Examiners
(VE's).
The Commission may either administer the examination itself, or under
the
supervision of a Volunteer Examiner Coordinator (VEC) or VE designated
by
the Commission.

Accordingly, we are requiring you to re-take the General Class Amateur
Examination, (Elements 2, 3(A) and 3(B)) under the supervision of an
American Radio Relay League Volunteer Examiner Coordinator. This
examination
must be completed on or before September 11, 2000. The required code
speed
that you must demonstrate is 5 words per minute.

Please be prepared to verify your current address and to present a
photo
identification. Pursuant to Commission rules, your license will be
cancelled
if you do not appear for re-examination. You will be granted an
Amateur
Radio license consistent with the elements you pass upon
re-examination.


Sincerely,



W. Riley Hollingsworth

Special Counsel, Amateur Radio

Enforcement Bureau
------------------------------

blah blah blah

"Overwhelming evidence," dumbass?

This topic has been addressed many times before and each and every time it
is brought forth, Roger spins his usual. He will challenge the poster to
show where he was retested for having violated any FCC rules or regs. Yet
the evidence is clearly there for all to see. No, he was not chosen at
"random" as he likes to claim.

See the above letter. Where does it say WHY other than the FCC's
perogative was the reason for the retest, fatass?

Yes, the FCC CAN ask any Ham licensee who was
licensed under the VEC program to retest, but when was the last time you
heard of that happening?

Go to the ARRL web site, dumbass and to the FCC enforcement logs, they
go back to 1999, there are quite a number of retests and canellations
because some didn't show up to retest. Or can't you even read?


Hollingsworth simply has too much to concern
himself with and the idiotic claim that they "randomly" chose Wiseman for a
retest is laughable at best.


I'll bet he'll be interested once he reads your kiddie porn ad.

The excerpts concerning the Wiseman debacle are easily found via several
sources. The ARRL site is one such example. A Google search will yield each
and every letter of warning for Malicious Interference by Wiseman...it takes
only a few minutes to find.

That's because there is only ONE letter, **** for brains. And it
"alledges" interference, which doesn't prove a thing. Then there of
course, it the preemptive letter which your buddy Gopher face recieved
also.
Didn't LRod explain this to you before? Or are you just too ****ing
stupid for it to have soaked in your empty, Evinrude motor cover
shaped skull the first time?

but the bottom line is that he was forced to
retest not randomly, but because Riley Hollingsworth was willing to rescind
his Ham License if he failed to comply.

Why didn't he say so in the letter? Nowhere does it say any license
would be recinded. Hollingsworth would have no qualms to put that in
the letter if it were so. Looks like you are blathering out of your
ignorant fat ass again.

[flush more of mentally ill retard Davies' blatherings]

Poor mentally ill retard Lardass Lloyd Davies. He'll soon be back in
the funny farm. He's tried suicide before, you know.

On 1 Jun 2004 19:13:45 -0700, (AB8MQ) wrote:

LARDASS Lloyd Davies aka "Arf! Arf!"
blathered in message ...
"more lies

Here's the letter, dumb****, word for word, do see if you canb spot
the reason for the retest, beside the FCC perogative for doing so. And
note, too, that the retest was PASSED, and later the license was
upgraded. Something you haven't been able to do in over 10 years. You
couldn't pass the Technician license exam TODAY if you had to.

This looks like a standard form letter that the FCC would send to
anyone whom they wish to retest. BTAIM, they certainly don't send
these letters out randomly. The FCC has had a good reason for sending
any letter such as this, and you can best bet that they had a damn
good reason for sending one to you....

....now come over here and gnaw some of these calluses off of yo'
mama's feet.

LARDASS the mentally ill retard Davies "Dot Com" NoEmail@NoSpam
whined in message ...
"AB8MQ" wrote in message
...
LARDASS Lloyd Davies aka "Arf! Arf!"
blathered in message ...
"more lies

Here's the letter, dumb****, word for word, do see if you canb spot
the reason for the retest, beside the FCC perogative for doing so. And
note, too, that the retest was PASSED, and later the license was
upgraded. Something you haven't been able to do in over 10 years. You
couldn't pass the Technician license exam TODAY if you had to.

....................

Don't care what the letter did NOT contain..

Of course, you do, it makes your delusions that you think are real all
full of holes like Swiss cheese.

The FCC has the authority, pursuant to §97.519(d)(2) of the rules to
readminister any examination element previously administered by a
volunteer examiner. ....Still stands, dumbass.

..HERE is the reason you were
made to retest and what Riley sent just prior to the retest notice.

November, 1999 to July, 2000 is more then "just prior to" fatty.
Several months. You forgot the cautionary letter that Riley sent
myself and the Gopher face, but then after I explained what Gopher
face had been doing on here and on the air, that is why he sent *that*
letter. Who do you think clued Riley into the disagreement in the
first place, dumbass?

Contrary to what you claim, I don't see anywhere in either letter where
Riley says a single word about a "random" retesting, as you lamely claim.

Anybody with more than your working two brain cells can, however. It's
even in the retest letter itself. No wonder you flunked out of those
public schools and just barely passed that christian school's courses.
But their standards are quite lower, after all. And, let's not for get
all you could manage at Kirkwood Community College is a "certificate".

"evidence that the licensee had been "deliberately and maliciously
interfering with the
radio operations of other licensed amateurs" on 20 meters. "This
interference has occurred at various times in the last several months
and includes broadcasting music and other unidentified transmissions,"

Wrong again, that was part of the warning letter that "alledges"
interference.
Why do you think they put this disclaimer on their releases on the
ARRl web page?
NOTE: Issuance by the FCC of a Warning Notice indicates that the FCC
has what it believes to be reliable evidence of possible rules
infractions and not necessarily that the recipient has violated FCC
rules.

Note that is says "evidence", Wussyman.

Too bad they left out the "manufactured" qualifier. "evidence" is
faked all the time, but if you weren't such a mentally ill retard who
lives in a fantyasy world of TimeLords and Daleks, you'd realize that.
The Letter states they have what they "believe to be reliable
evidence" doesn't necessarily make it so, your brain dead retard.

The letter doesn't say, "Things have
been a little bit slow for us here at the FCC, so to help fill our down
times we have instituted a new program of randomly retesting Amateur Radio
Operators."

No it says:
The FCC has the authority, pursuant to §97.519(d)(2) of the rules to
readminister any examination element previously administered by a
volunteer examiner.

Which pretty much makes the "random" part quite true. Why do you think
there are so many in those many enforcement logs who have lost their
license because they didn't bother to show up for a retest? Read it
for yourself. Oh, sorry, I momentarily forgot whom I am addressing.
Get someone to read it for you and explain it to you.

The notice says, "evidence", which means YOU DID IT,

No, that was the "warning letter of Nov. 1999, that wasn't in the
retest letter at all. And it was still "allegations" of interference.
In fact it says:
NOTE: Issuance by the FCC of a Warning Notice indicates that the FCC
has what it believes to be reliable evidence of possible rules
infractions and not necessarily that the recipient has violated FCC
rules.

and probably a whole lot more that you didn't get caught for.

You mean like when you play "Amazing Grace" on 20 meters?

And again, no, it just means they have faked tapes by Gopher face and
Davey boy trying to get somebody into trouble. Happens all the time,
just like it did to AC5IU. He got a warning letter for interference,
but they later recanted.

For crying out loud, Wiseman.

You seem to be doing more than your fair share of that, Lardass.

Your pathetic denials are really, really lame,
but that is to be expected of a congenital liar.

Too bad you had to plagiarize fatass high-el's words, huh Davies, you
sure couldn't come up with a word like "congenital" on your own.

--
The FCC has the authority, pursuant to §97.519(d)(2) of the rules to
readminister any examination element previously administered by a
volunteer examiner.

Roger's Big Fat Mama whined in message
. ..

110 pounds is *fat? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! Is
your mommy a circus dwarf, fatty, and that accounts for you only being
5' 6"?

On 1 Jun 2004 19:13:45 -0700, (AB8MQ) wrote:

LARDASS Lloyd Davies aka "Arf! Arf!"
blathered in message ...
"more lies

Here's the letter, dumb****, word for word, do see if you canb spot
the reason for the retest, beside the FCC perogative for doing so. And
note, too, that the retest was PASSED, and later the license was
upgraded. Something you haven't been able to do in over 10 years. You
couldn't pass the Technician license exam TODAY if you had to.

This looks like a standard form letter that the FCC would send to
anyone whom they wish to retest. BTAIM, they certainly don't send
these letters out randomly.

Read my reply to your other sock puppet, LARDASS.

They can and DO send them out ramdomly.

The FCC has had a good reason for sending
any letter such as this, and you can best bet that they had a damn
good reason for sending one to you....

Now Lardass, it was already explained to you as your other sock
puppet.
They have the authority to at any time require a ham who initially
tested under the VE program to retest. Funny thing is, after you've
been retested they can't retest you again as far as I know.
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
You lose again, Davies!

...now come over here and gnaw some of these calluses off of yo'
mama's feet.

Say, Lardass Lloyd, do you really keep your dead mommy's body in your
roach infested HUD ROACH MOTEL Section 8 public housing apartment for
sodomy?

Is this really you Roger?

http://profiles.yahoo.com/ab8mq

--
Schwartz