Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It has been let slip that discussions are underway to investigate the
possibility of an international exam for Ham Radio. Now, it seems to me, that such discussions should not be conducted by clandestine individuals (who may deceive themselves into thinking that they are somehow important) but should be brought right out into the open. In consideration that Ham Radio is essentially a technical pursuit (as distinct from CB Radio in its various guises, all of which are identifiable from the use of shop-bought-and- repaired rigs), what should such an exam have as its syllabus? Should such a syllabus represent the way in which Ham Radio is slowly going down the drain?..... 1. Elementary electrical circuits - R, L & C, configurations in parallel, series and evaluations of resonance thereto. 2. Elementary active devices plus Class A, B, C & D amplifiers. 3. Oscillator circuits (although we might drop "Hartley" these days!) 4. Logic gates and digital counters. 5. Computer programming in assembler. 6. Mixers and multipliers. 7. How to negotiate with a CB shop to get 10% off the purchase price. 8. How to whinge that Morse Code is irrelevant. 9. (Especially for the M3/CB Fool's Licence or the Technician/Novice licensee) - How to SWAAAAARRRR the twig? 10. How to sneer at those who promote technical excellence but without revealing one's own nugatory vacuousness? 11. The correct jargon to use, "My personal is.....", "What's your 20?", etc. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:11:50 -0000, Airy R.Bean wrote:
It has been let slip that discussions are underway to investigate the possibility of an international exam for Ham Radio. Could you cite a reference for that? I have seen references to "International Amateur Radio Exam", but not for what you mention above. -- from Aero Spike |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Airy R.Bean wrote:
It has been let slip that discussions are underway to investigate the possibility of an international exam for Ham Radio. Now, it seems to me, that such discussions should not be conducted by clandestine individuals (who may deceive themselves into thinking that they are somehow important) Every time you open your mouth - you put your size ten in it! Micky -- E&OE (C) 2005 Micky Taker Micky Taker accepts no responsibility for any personal injury or emotional distress that may occur as a result of reading the contents of this message. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The reference is to a posited _EXAM_ and not to a licence.
"Lloyd" wrote in message ... A few countries already issue the International Amateur Radio License (IARL). I hold an IARL from Chile. 73, Lloyd "Airy R.Bean" wrote in message ... It has been let slip that discussions are underway to investigate the possibility of an international exam for Ham Radio. Now, it seems to me, that such discussions should not be conducted by clandestine individuals (who may deceive themselves into thinking that they are somehow important) but should be brought right out into the open. In consideration that Ham Radio is essentially a technical pursuit (as distinct from CB Radio in its various guises, all of which are identifiable from the use of shop-bought-and- repaired rigs), what should such an exam have as its syllabus? Should such a syllabus represent the way in which Ham Radio is slowly going down the drain?..... 1. Elementary electrical circuits - R, L & C, configurations in parallel, series and evaluations of resonance thereto. 2. Elementary active devices plus Class A, B, C & D amplifiers. 3. Oscillator circuits (although we might drop "Hartley" these days!) 4. Logic gates and digital counters. 5. Computer programming in assembler. 6. Mixers and multipliers. 7. How to negotiate with a CB shop to get 10% off the purchase price. 8. How to whinge that Morse Code is irrelevant. 9. (Especially for the M3/CB Fool's Licence or the Technician/Novice licensee) - How to SWAAAAARRRR the twig? 10. How to sneer at those who promote technical excellence but without revealing one's own nugatory vacuousness? 11. The correct jargon to use, "My personal is.....", "What's your 20?", etc. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Airy R.Bean wrote: The reference is to a posited _EXAM_ and not to a licence. Uh oh! We've seen that jangled English before...Could it be...?!?! Please no! Steve, K4YZ |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please explain yourself.....
"K4YZ" wrote in message ups.com... Airy R.Bean wrote: The reference is to a posited _EXAM_ and not to a licence. Uh oh! We've seen that jangled English before...Could it be...?!?! Please no! |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I didn't make _ANY_ typos.
"K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... Airy R.Bean wrote: Please explain yourself..... "K4YZ" wrote in message Airy R.Bean wrote: The reference is to a posited _EXAM_ and not to a licence. Uh oh! We've seen that jangled English before...Could it be...?!?! Please no! Never mind. You made several obvious typos that one previous poster used to make regularly. I thought he perhaps returned under a new nomme-de-guerre. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Airy R.Bean wrote: Please explain yourself..... "K4YZ" wrote in message Airy R.Bean wrote: The reference is to a posited _EXAM_ and not to a licence. Uh oh! We've seen that jangled English before...Could it be...?!?! Please no! Never mind. You made several obvious typos that one previous poster used to make regularly. I thought he perhaps returned under a new nomme-de-guerre. Sorry! 73 Steve, K4YZ |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Airy R.Bean" wrote in message
... It has been let slip that discussions are underway to investigate the possibility of an international exam for Ham Radio. In Which Language? Now, it seems to me, that such discussions should not be conducted by clandestine individuals (who may deceive themselves into thinking that they are somehow important) but should be brought right out into the open. In consideration that Ham Radio is essentially a technical pursuit (as distinct from CB Radio in its various guises, all of which are identifiable from the use of shop-bought-and- repaired rigs), what should such an exam have as its syllabus? Should such a syllabus represent the way in which Ham Radio is slowly going down the drain?..... 1. Elementary electrical circuits - R, L & C, configurations in parallel, series and evaluations of resonance thereto. 2. Elementary active devices plus Class A, B, C & D amplifiers. 3. Oscillator circuits (although we might drop "Hartley" these days!) as in J R Hartley 4. Logic gates and digital counters. You've forgotten fuzzy logic 5. Computer programming in assembler. No 9 Alive! 6. Mixers and multipliers. 7. How to negotiate with a CB shop to get 10% off the purchase price. 8. How to whinge that Morse Code is irrelevant. Now you're being morose. 9. (Especially for the M3/CB Fool's Licence or the Technician/Novice licensee) - How to SWAAAAARRRR the twig? 10. How to sneer at those who promote technical excellence but without revealing one's own nugatory vacuousness? 11. The correct jargon to use, "My personal is.....", "What's your 20?", etc. and you are? |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
International organizations have a poor time regulating anything
So as we say in New York -- foo getta bout it -- Caveat Lector (Reader Beware) Help The New Hams Someone Helped You Or did You Forget That ? "David Reed" wrote in message ... "Airy R.Bean" wrote in message ... It has been let slip that discussions are underway to investigate the possibility of an international exam for Ham Radio. In Which Language? Now, it seems to me, that such discussions should not be conducted by clandestine individuals (who may deceive themselves into thinking that they are somehow important) but should be brought right out into the open. In consideration that Ham Radio is essentially a technical pursuit (as distinct from CB Radio in its various guises, all of which are identifiable from the use of shop-bought-and- repaired rigs), what should such an exam have as its syllabus? Should such a syllabus represent the way in which Ham Radio is slowly going down the drain?..... 1. Elementary electrical circuits - R, L & C, configurations in parallel, series and evaluations of resonance thereto. 2. Elementary active devices plus Class A, B, C & D amplifiers. 3. Oscillator circuits (although we might drop "Hartley" these days!) as in J R Hartley 4. Logic gates and digital counters. You've forgotten fuzzy logic 5. Computer programming in assembler. No 9 Alive! 6. Mixers and multipliers. 7. How to negotiate with a CB shop to get 10% off the purchase price. 8. How to whinge that Morse Code is irrelevant. Now you're being morose. 9. (Especially for the M3/CB Fool's Licence or the Technician/Novice licensee) - How to SWAAAAARRRR the twig? 10. How to sneer at those who promote technical excellence but without revealing one's own nugatory vacuousness? 11. The correct jargon to use, "My personal is.....", "What's your 20?", etc. and you are? |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|