"Roger" wrote in message
...


Wrong tense. WAS a technical pursuit . . .

Ham radio and the ideals you mention is dead. Killed by
the RSCB in favour of the new hobby radio, now
designated "Multiband CB"

With the average age of an M3 being about 12 - and with an
IQ to match - any notions about hobby radio being a "technical
pursuit" are simply silly.

Welcome to the brave new world, courtesy of the Potty Bar
book club . . .


Young Nick

One must assume, of course, that you are not addressing the likes of the
potty-mouthed fifty going on fifteen year old types that lurk herein.
Wiseman will take issue with that comparison.

For that matter, when did "young Nick" ever post a technical topic on here?

I don't recall any, even Gareth has managed the odd one.

--
73
Brian, G8OSN
www.g8osn.org.uk

Mark wrote:

Mr Poos, you are always on the ball! lol.

Thank you, good sir

73

Poos

--
vy 73 de Conrad Poos

"Ich bin ein radio amateur"

....amateur radio has been given over to the masses. The technical part of
ham radio has never really been that complicated. The segregator was the
code requirement.

Personally, I am glad to see a trend toward opening up the hobby. This
implies that more X'mitters will be around during the time of an emergency.

Wayne-
(KC8UIO)
"Roger" wrote in message
...


Wrong tense. WAS a technical pursuit . . .

Ham radio and the ideals you mention is dead. Killed by
the RSCB in favour of the new hobby radio, now
designated "Multiband CB"

With the average age of an M3 being about 12 - and with an
IQ to match - any notions about hobby radio being a "technical
pursuit" are simply silly.

Welcome to the brave new world, courtesy of the Potty Bar
book club . . .


Young Nick

One must assume, of course, that you are not addressing the likes of the
potty-mouthed fifty going on fifteen year old types that lurk herein.
Wiseman will take issue with that comparison.

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
"Roger" wrote in message
...



For that matter, when did "young Nick" ever post a technical topic on
here?

Probably another G4SDW sock puppet, Brian...


I don't recall any, even Gareth has managed the odd one.

They may have been technical, however, they would have made little sense.

Regards

tox

What's up with the insincere usage of 73 in these newsgroups. One guy calls
me "stupid" and another calls me a clown. In closing their views, they sign
it "73's."

Since when is stating my opinion "trolling." I believe that opening up the
bands will have some very positive results. For one, it could help stimulate
the economy if more people are buying amateur equipment.

Apparently, others feel as I do or else the amateur licensing requirements
would not be restructured to eliminate high-speed Morse.

Wayne-
(KC8UIO)
"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 09:41:58 GMT, "Wayne P. Muckleroy"
wrote:

...amateur radio has been given over to the masses. The technical part of
ham radio has never really been that complicated. The segregator was the
code requirement.

Personally, I am glad to see a trend toward opening up the hobby. This
implies that more X'mitters will be around during the time of an
emergency.

Wayne-
(KC8UIO)

Are you going to post your idiotic trolling in *every* amateur radio
group, Wayne? The ink is scarcely dry on your licence, but you think
you know it all already. What a clown.

73 de G3NYY

--
Walt Davidson Email: g3nyy @despammed.com

But not as odd as "E^(-jwt) is a function that
decreases with increasing time".

Brian Reay wrote:
For that matter, when did "young Nick" ever post a technical topic on here?
I don't recall any, even Gareth has managed the odd one.

"Wayne P. Muckleroy" wrote in message
. ..
What's up with the insincere usage of 73 in these newsgroups. One guy
calls me "stupid" and another calls me a clown. In closing their views,
they sign it "73's."

Top posting is stupid...

HTH
tox

On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 18:48:54 GMT, "tox" wrote:


"Wayne P. Muckleroy" wrote in message
...
What's up with the insincere usage of 73 in these newsgroups. One guy
calls me "stupid" and another calls me a clown. In closing their views,
they sign it "73's."

Top posting is stupid...

Nearly as stupid as writing "73's".

--

73 de Jock.

Si les parallèles se rejoignent effectivement à
l'infini, je descendrai du train un peu avant.

Wayne P. Muckleroy wrote:
What's up with the insincere usage of 73 in these newsgroups. One guy calls
me "stupid" and another calls me a clown. In closing their views, they sign
it "73's."

becuase they so full of **** they don't even know it and they don't
know the word Hypocrite

Since when is stating my opinion "trolling." I believe that opening up the
bands will have some very positive results. For one, it could help stimulate
the economy if more people are buying amateur equipment.

don't hold your breath on that one

Apparently, others feel as I do or else the amateur licensing requirements
would not be restructured to eliminate high-speed Morse.

you do mean any morse

Wayne-
(KC8UIO)
"Walt Davidson" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 09:41:58 GMT, "Wayne P. Muckleroy"
wrote:

...amateur radio has been given over to the masses. The technical part of
ham radio has never really been that complicated. The segregator was the
code requirement.

Personally, I am glad to see a trend toward opening up the hobby. This
implies that more X'mitters will be around during the time of an
emergency.

Wayne-
(KC8UIO)

Are you going to post your idiotic trolling in *every* amateur radio
group, Wayne? The ink is scarcely dry on your licence, but you think
you know it all already. What a clown.

73 de G3NYY

--
Walt Davidson Email: g3nyy @despammed.com

Polymath wrote:
By which I mean the tirades of personal insults
and intolerance that emanate within these NG?

Wha happened to the international traditions
of gentlemanliness?

they died year ago at least in the US

Ham Radio is a technical pursuit for those suitably
motivated. Let us remember that in our dealings
within these NG.