On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:49:07 -0400, "craptosser #3"
wrote:


"Vinnie S." wrote in message
.. .
On 26 Oct 2005 13:34:04 -0700, wrote:


If Hollingsworth

Hey, that guy sounds familiar !!!!!!

Vinnie S.

Hopefully it will be one of several names that will
appear on a future NAL to K1MAN for $20K+
in FCC fines. ("from our mouth to G-d's ear")


Sounds like there are some ego-maniacs at work here. I don't see any reason for
most of this other than wanting publicity. I do not know anything about K1MAN,
other than the fact he is trying to be the Howard Stern of Ham radio, or that is
the way it appears to me.

What ever happened to simple plain DXing with other fellow hams?

Vinnie S.

K4YZ wrote:
nobodys_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
molested_an_old_friends_son wrote:
Hank Oredson wrote:
Heard him on 14.275 this morning.

--
gald to hear it having provoked this fight with the FCC he needs to
finish carry through to the end

Most of us ARE galled to hear about Baxter, Markie....He's a
skidmark in the shorts of life as far as Amateur Radio goes.

you know that statement consideing the source is an endorsement

"considering"

Only a deviant who think's having another man's excrement on his
genitals is "acceptable" would think that.

more lying stevie
if you can't tell the turth for even a single sentence then I don't
even read the rest of your post

let alone coment on it

Vinnie S. wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:49:07 -0400, "craptosser #3"
wrote:


"Vinnie S." wrote in message
.. .
On 26 Oct 2005 13:34:04 -0700, wrote:


If Hollingsworth

Hey, that guy sounds familiar !!!!!!

Vinnie S.

Hopefully it will be one of several names that will
appear on a future NAL to K1MAN for $20K+
in FCC fines. ("from our mouth to G-d's ear")


Sounds like there are some ego-maniacs at work here. I don't see any reason for
most of this other than wanting publicity. I do not know anything about K1MAN,
other than the fact he is trying to be the Howard Stern of Ham radio, or that is
the way it appears to me.

that is what some of the postere want you to think at any rate looking
past the noise he seems to be an obnoxious fellow who has choosen to
test the limits at the FCC. not what I call wise to do so but US law
does not require wisdom of its cirizens (thank the gods or else there
would be no room in jail and kiley no one to gaurd them)

What ever happened to simple plain DXing with other fellow hams?

Vinnie S.

On 27 Oct 2005 07:31:29 -0700, "an_old_friend" wrote:


Sounds like there are some ego-maniacs at work here. I don't see any reason for
most of this other than wanting publicity. I do not know anything about K1MAN,
other than the fact he is trying to be the Howard Stern of Ham radio, or that is
the way it appears to me.

that is what some of the postere want you to think at any rate looking
past the noise he seems to be an obnoxious fellow who has choosen to
test the limits at the FCC.

That is exactly what it appears to me from what I have been reading. He is doing
nothing more than being anti-establishment or anti-government.

Everyone to his own, I guess. Like I said. I am perfectly happy DXing with other
fellow hams, without testing limits or pushing authority.

Vinnie S.

The hatred being spewed here is all too common in ham radio
today and represents what this once great hobby has degenerated
into.

When rational minds prevail, virtually all informed sources, both
in and out of the FCC, agree that legal precedent is clearly on
the side of Mr Baxter, and in the final analysis, Mr Baxter will
carry the day, much to the chagrin of his detractors.


Lloyd
CEO, Dalek Ltd.

Vinnie S. wrote:
On 27 Oct 2005 07:31:29 -0700, "an_old_friend" wrote:


Sounds like there are some ego-maniacs at work here. I don't see any reason for
most of this other than wanting publicity. I do not know anything about K1MAN,
other than the fact he is trying to be the Howard Stern of Ham radio, or that is
the way it appears to me.

that is what some of the postere want you to think at any rate looking
past the noise he seems to be an obnoxious fellow who has choosen to
test the limits at the FCC.

That is exactly what it appears to me from what I have been reading. He is doing
nothing more than being anti-establishment or anti-government.

Everyone to his own, I guess. Like I said. I am perfectly happy DXing with other
fellow hams, without testing limits or pushing authority.

right now my only concern with K1MAN is that him having largely coosen
to provoke this clash their are good reason he needs to brazen it

he may be making a principled stand on something but in any event
having started this he needs to see it through

Vinnie S.

an_old_friend wrote:
Vinnie S. wrote:

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:49:07 -0400, "craptosser #3"
wrote:


"Vinnie S." wrote in message
...

On 26 Oct 2005 13:34:04 -0700, wrote:



If Hollingsworth

Hey, that guy sounds familiar !!!!!!

Vinnie S.

Hopefully it will be one of several names that will
appear on a future NAL to K1MAN for $20K+
in FCC fines. ("from our mouth to G-d's ear")


Sounds like there are some ego-maniacs at work here. I don't see any reason for
most of this other than wanting publicity. I do not know anything about K1MAN,
other than the fact he is trying to be the Howard Stern of Ham radio, or that is
the way it appears to me.


that is what some of the postere want you to think at any rate looking
past the noise he seems to be an obnoxious fellow who has choosen to
test the limits at the FCC. not what I call wise to do so but US law
does not require wisdom of its cirizens (thank the gods or else there
would be no room in jail and kiley no one to gaurd them)

U.S. law requires obedience to that law for all who are "cirizens" or
"non-cirizens". If everyone is in jail, Kiley can "gaurd" them, Colonel.

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Vinnie S. wrote:

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 23:49:07 -0400, "craptosser #3"
wrote:


"Vinnie S." wrote in message
...

On 26 Oct 2005 13:34:04 -0700, wrote:



If Hollingsworth

Hey, that guy sounds familiar !!!!!!

Vinnie S.

Hopefully it will be one of several names that will
appear on a future NAL to K1MAN for $20K+
in FCC fines. ("from our mouth to G-d's ear")


Sounds like there are some ego-maniacs at work here. I don't see any reason for
most of this other than wanting publicity. I do not know anything about K1MAN,
other than the fact he is trying to be the Howard Stern of Ham radio, or that is
the way it appears to me.


that is what some of the postere want you to think at any rate looking
past the noise he seems to be an obnoxious fellow who has choosen to
test the limits at the FCC. not what I call wise to do so but US law
does not require wisdom of its cirizens (thank the gods or else there
would be no room in jail and kiley no one to gaurd them)

U.S. law requires obedience to that law for all who are "cirizens" or
"non-cirizens". If everyone is in jail, Kiley can "gaurd" them, Colonel.

as point of fact US Law does NOT require any to obey them is simply
provides for penalities if you choose to break them , and get caught,
and have DA (or other figure as approprate) choose to file charges and
after the full due process is gone through

proof of the exist in the way companies sometimes choose to pay fins
rather than comply with dumping rules for example.

BTW as I said NO US LAW or Reg requires or punishses a lack of wisdom

Dave K8MN

Lloyd wrote:
The hatred being spewed here is all too common in ham radio
today and represents what this once great hobby has degenerated
into.

When rational minds prevail, virtually all informed sources, both
in and out of the FCC, agree that legal precedent is clearly on
the side of Mr Baxter, and in the final analysis, Mr Baxter will
carry the day, much to the chagrin of his detractors.


Lloyd
CEO, Dalek Ltd.

Go play with your dalek dolls, 32 year old VIRGIN!

Who gives a rat's ass!

wrote in message
oups.com...
K1MAN BULLETIN - B051026A -

LEGAL UPDATE FROM THE AMERICAN AMATEUR RADIO ASSOCIATION (AARA) AND
INTERNATIONAL AMATEUR RADIO NETWORK (IARN) LEGAL DEPARTMENT:

AARA is literally flooded these days with E-Mails and calls regarding
K1MAN's on going battle with the FCC. A trip to a local law library
has been recommended to hundreds of people. Look at 47 CFR Part 1,
Subparts A and B. Of particular interest has been 47 CFR Pt. 1.62:

"(a)(1) Where there is pending before the Commission at the time
of expiration of license any proper and timely application for renewal
of license with respect to any activity of a continuing nature (such
as amateur radio), in accordance with the provisions of section 9(b)
of the Administrative Procedures Act, such license shall remain in
effect until such time as the Commission shall make a final
determination with respect to the renewal application."

The FCC has acknowledged K1MAN's timely filed renewal application on
their web site. Look up K1MAN on www.QRZ.com and click on FCC INFO.

If Hollingsworth and Company try and argue in court that Granting
K1MAN's recent timely filed renewal application and then "setting it
aside" the very next day constitutes "final determination with respect
to the renewal application," thus satisfying 47 CFR Pt. 1.62 and the
14th Amendment to the United States Constitution which guarantees due
process of law, they will lose in the D.C. Court of Appeals if not
lose in front of a Commission Administrative Law Judge. Just doing
nothing more than "setting the license aside," as they have so
pathetically tried so far, is not going to "cut it" at IARN and AARA,
and K1MAN has no other choices other than to "give up on America" (not
in this lifetime!) or to continue operating under 47 CFR Pt. 1.62 (2):

"A licensee operating by virtue of this paragraph shall, after
the date of expiration in the license, post, in addition to the
original license, any acknowledgment received from the Commission
that the renewal application has been accepted for filing.

Note that the FCC web site lists K1MAN's renewal application as
"PENDING." A printout of this has been posted next to K1MAN's
original (now expired) license per 47 CFR 1.62 (2), and K1MAN on air
operations continue under this entitled authority.

Secondly, federal law does not allow anything alleged in an unpaid
NAL to be brought up in any other proceeding such as a renewal hearing
or revocation hearing. The April 2005 $21,000 NAL against K1MAN has
not been affirmed by the Commission and is illegal anyway since the
substantive issues therein are the same as the ones in the unpaid 1990
NALs illegally "deep sixed" by the Commission years ago.

America is a land of laws and not of cheap and corrupt men like
Hollingsworth and Company. He must have been sick on the day they
taught law at law school, wherever that might have been. He should
have gotten a note from his mother and made up that ENTIRE day! How
much of YOUR tax money has poorly educated Hollingsworth and Company
wasted already on old K1MAN? If there are valid issues with K1MAN
(or W1AW and ARRL), let's go to court and be done with it. I
will even buy Hollingsworth's lunch! Until that day comes, K1MAN
continues to operate on the air under entitled authority CFR 47 Pt.
1.62. 73 and GL de K1MAN

AARA Membership

www.K1MAN.com

GLENN BAXTER, K1MAN, AUTOBIOGRAPHY

BELGRADE LAKES INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED RESEARCH