Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi, I have a Yaesu/Vertex VX-150 & VX-6R. Was looking at the manuals the
other day and noticed the different emission types. Essentially the 150 uses Phase modulation (G3E) and the 6R uses FM (F3E). Will there be any appreciable difference in the performance of these radios because of this? I have noticed that, using an interchangeable antenna, the 6R has a greater range than the 150, even though they're both supposedly putting out 5 watts. Could the different emission types be the cause of this? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The modulation type won't cause this as you wouldn't be able to tell
the difference in a reciever. Phase Modulation and FM Modulation with 75 uS pre-emphasis sound exactly the same. 75uSeconds is the time constant of the RC network in the FM microphone audio circuit. It's likely a difference in the receiver sections or antennas. Stuart WB6RXG On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:40:12 GMT, "Falky foo" wrote: Hi, I have a Yaesu/Vertex VX-150 & VX-6R. Was looking at the manuals the other day and noticed the different emission types. Essentially the 150 uses Phase modulation (G3E) and the 6R uses FM (F3E). Will there be any appreciable difference in the performance of these radios because of this? I have noticed that, using an interchangeable antenna, the 6R has a greater range than the 150, even though they're both supposedly putting out 5 watts. Could the different emission types be the cause of this? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks! Any idea why the different radios use different modulations?
WB6RXG wrote in message ... The modulation type won't cause this as you wouldn't be able to tell the difference in a reciever. Phase Modulation and FM Modulation with 75 uS pre-emphasis sound exactly the same. 75uSeconds is the time constant of the RC network in the FM microphone audio circuit. It's likely a difference in the receiver sections or antennas. Stuart WB6RXG On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:40:12 GMT, "Falky foo" wrote: Hi, I have a Yaesu/Vertex VX-150 & VX-6R. Was looking at the manuals the other day and noticed the different emission types. Essentially the 150 uses Phase modulation (G3E) and the 6R uses FM (F3E). Will there be any appreciable difference in the performance of these radios because of this? I have noticed that, using an interchangeable antenna, the 6R has a greater range than the 150, even though they're both supposedly putting out 5 watts. Could the different emission types be the cause of this? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know but I would suspect it is simply design considerations by
the design engineers. WB6RXG On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 00:50:45 GMT, "Falky foo" wrote: Thanks! Any idea why the different radios use different modulations? WB6RXG wrote in message ... The modulation type won't cause this as you wouldn't be able to tell the difference in a reciever. Phase Modulation and FM Modulation with 75 uS pre-emphasis sound exactly the same. 75uSeconds is the time constant of the RC network in the FM microphone audio circuit. It's likely a difference in the receiver sections or antennas. Stuart WB6RXG On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:40:12 GMT, "Falky foo" wrote: Hi, I have a Yaesu/Vertex VX-150 & VX-6R. Was looking at the manuals the other day and noticed the different emission types. Essentially the 150 uses Phase modulation (G3E) and the 6R uses FM (F3E). Will there be any appreciable difference in the performance of these radios because of this? I have noticed that, using an interchangeable antenna, the 6R has a greater range than the 150, even though they're both supposedly putting out 5 watts. Could the different emission types be the cause of this? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Perhaps this will help compare FM to Phase modulation
as I remember it in collge http://www.musicdsp.org/showone.php?id=160 -- CL -- I doubt, therefore I might be ! WB6RXG wrote in message ... I don't know but I would suspect it is simply design considerations by the design engineers. WB6RXG On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 00:50:45 GMT, "Falky foo" wrote: Thanks! Any idea why the different radios use different modulations? WB6RXG wrote in message ... The modulation type won't cause this as you wouldn't be able to tell the difference in a reciever. Phase Modulation and FM Modulation with 75 uS pre-emphasis sound exactly the same. 75uSeconds is the time constant of the RC network in the FM microphone audio circuit. It's likely a difference in the receiver sections or antennas. Stuart WB6RXG On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:40:12 GMT, "Falky foo" wrote: Hi, I have a Yaesu/Vertex VX-150 & VX-6R. Was looking at the manuals the other day and noticed the different emission types. Essentially the 150 uses Phase modulation (G3E) and the 6R uses FM (F3E). Will there be any appreciable difference in the performance of these radios because of this? I have noticed that, using an interchangeable antenna, the 6R has a greater range than the 150, even though they're both supposedly putting out 5 watts. Could the different emission types be the cause of this? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 00:50:45 +0000, Falky foo wrote:
Thanks! Any idea why the different radios use different modulations? Phase modulation is simpler to implement, thus cheaper to build. -- Korbin Dallas The name was changed to protect the guilty. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 01:40:12 +0000, Falky foo wrote:
Hi, I have a Yaesu/Vertex VX-150 & VX-6R. Was looking at the manuals the other day and noticed the different emission types. Essentially the 150 uses Phase modulation (G3E) and the 6R uses FM (F3E). Will there be any appreciable difference in the performance of these radios because of this? I have noticed that, using an interchangeable antenna, the 6R has a greater range than the 150, even though they're both supposedly putting out 5 watts. Could the different emission types be the cause of this? When you say Range what exactly are you talking about? Range is a combination of transmit power, receiver sensitivity and propagation path. Do you know what power the radios are putting out Did you measure there output? Do you know the receiver Sensitivity for these particular radios? Published specs are for comparison only, actual production radios will differ from published specs by significant amounts. -- Korbin Dallas The name was changed to protect the guilty. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Didn't do detailed analysis.. just realized that the VX-6 was hitting
repeaters better than the VX-150, even when using the same antenna. Wondered if that difference was because of the different modulation types. When you say Range what exactly are you talking about? Range is a combination of transmit power, receiver sensitivity and propagation path. Do you know what power the radios are putting out Did you measure there output? Do you know the receiver Sensitivity for these particular radios? Published specs are for comparison only, actual production radios will differ from published specs by significant amounts. -- Korbin Dallas The name was changed to protect the guilty. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Transmitter Range graph
http://www.artscipub.com/simpleton/simp.range.html -- CL -- I doubt, therefore I might be ! "Falky foo" wrote in message . com... Didn't do detailed analysis.. just realized that the VX-6 was hitting repeaters better than the VX-150, even when using the same antenna. Wondered if that difference was because of the different modulation types. When you say Range what exactly are you talking about? Range is a combination of transmit power, receiver sensitivity and propagation path. Do you know what power the radios are putting out Did you measure there output? Do you know the receiver Sensitivity for these particular radios? Published specs are for comparison only, actual production radios will differ from published specs by significant amounts. -- Korbin Dallas The name was changed to protect the guilty. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Other things enter into the equasion: includeing how WIDE the signal
is-- Most repeaters have recieve filters that accept modulation to: +- 4.9 KHZ (and that ONLY if you are relatively close to the input frequency) over +- 800 HZ can accentuate clipping of your signal- if you exceed +- 5 KHz, you will lose some audio, due to "clipping", and it gets worse , if you are off frequency ! "tis a case of TOO MUCH audio being WORSE than too little! Essentially, Phase modulation is the same as Frequency modulation, and there should be little diff. between the 2, as far as the recievers are concerned. The "Modulation Index" is the limiting factor- Keep in mind that a Commercial FM station (150 KHz +- deviation) , has also , many subcarriers in the signal, that you don't hear (like background music for stores, sterio piolets, stock market data, ect) ALL in their carrier- you can detect those with filters at the appropriate freq, and BANDWIDTH. and, there are outfits that sell adapters for fm recievers to decode them (but you wont hear the normal broadcast, thru them!) Television stations do similar things with their audio, and video! These are called SUB CARRIERS. In sum total, IF your modulation index exceeds the bandwidth of your reciever ,the audio will be limited (or eleminated)! But that doesn't mean that your audio isn't there, only that the reciever refuses to accept your overmodulation-- dont try to speak LOUDER, try whispering, and see if you get a response! Jim NN7K Falky foo wrote: Didn't do detailed analysis.. just realized that the VX-6 was hitting repeaters better than the VX-150, even when using the same antenna. Wondered if that difference was because of the different modulation types. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Announcing the 'new' Yaesu FRG-7700 Receiver Users eGroup on YAHOO ! | Shortwave | |||
FS: Icom, Yaesu, Alinco Manuals | Swap | |||
FS: Yaesu FT-897 SERVICE MANUAL | Swap | |||
FS: Icom, Yaesu Service Manuals Etc... | Swap | |||
FS: Icom, Yaesu Service Manuals | Swap |