Sucked off an old freind wrote:
wrote:
sucked off an old friend wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
ass****ed by an old freind wrote:
wrote:
an old freind wrote:

as I said I do it


You just admitted you'd do it to another man, queer!
yes I have "admited" that many times

BWHAHAHAHA Markie admits he likes the taste of cock!
yes indeed

MUWHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Markie admits he's a queer cocksucker!

wrote:
Sucked off an old freind wrote:
wrote:

MUWHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Markie admits he's a queer cocksucker!
yes i did that 8 years ago wismen

in the last century and you still don't get it

get help

an old friend wrote:
wrote:
Sucked off an old freind wrote:
wrote:

MUWHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Markie admits he's a queer cocksucker!
yes i did that 8 years ago wismen

BWHAHAHAHA Markie is proud of it!

get help

You direct the same words at almost everyone who takes the time to mock
your many shortcomings; such as your inability to construct logical
arguments, your limited vocabulary, your utter failure at projecting
even a tiny bit of personality in your writing, the lack of character
that prevents you from admitting your mistakes, your total lack of
flaming ability, your choice of newsgroups, your hair style, your lisp,
your semi-famous effort to conduct a comparative study of the taste
of semen, and many others I must elide from this article due to space
constraints.

Because of this, the words have lost any effect it might otherwise
possess. Because you limply toss it in the ring every time someone
gets the better of you - i.e. every time you try your fairy hand
against someone who isn't a fellow faggot - you've successfully
emasculated the words through overuse.

Also, your use of them are very, very boring.

On 15 Jun 2006 04:54:41 -0700, Not Cocksucker Lloyd Secwet Woger wrote:
: You direct the same words at almost everyone who takes the time to mock
: your many shortcomings; such as your inability to construct logical
[FLUSH]

Your post was plagiarized directly from
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a...e=source&hl=en

As always, you are incapable of original prose or thought.


========
"Plagiarize,
Let no one else's work evade your eyes,
Remember why the good Lord made your eyes,
So don't shade your eyes,
But plagiarize, plagiarize, plagiarize"
-- Tom Leherer, the Lobachevsky song

Saggytits Oyen wrote:
On 15 Jun 2006 04:54:41 -0700, Not Cocksucker Lloyd Secwet Woger wrote:
: You direct the same words at almost everyone who takes the time to mock
: your many shortcomings; such as your inability to construct logical
[FLUSH]

Your post was plagiarized

So was yours, ****tard. Say hi to Chelsea who realy owns your house in
Phoenix!

Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
Saggytits Oyen wrote:
On 15 Jun 2006 04:54:41 -0700, Not Cocksucker Lloyd Secwet Woger wrote:
: You direct the same words at almost everyone who takes the time to mock
: your many shortcomings; such as your inability to construct logical
[FLUSH]

Your post was plagiarized

So was yours, ****tard. Say hi to Chelsea who really owns your house in
Phoenix!

Here's how Saggytits works, he takes a cut and paste adds a few words
to it, and tries to pass it off as his own.

****up Stagger Lee proves he's as ignorant of

music as he is in everything else when he utters the following
stupidity in :
"Eric Clapton even wrote a song about Leila!"


"Stagger Backpedal BOY Lee" blathered more
idiocy when he tried to backpedal out of his ****up in message
:
"On one of the most complete web sites of Eric Clapton music
(http://www.netmusicitalia.it/spot/archivio/v.html), we read that one
of the selections is:
2/01 Vidal bagnoschiuma Eric Clapton "Laila"
which is, of course, a different composition than the more familiar
"Layla" that SWR Boy was trying to discuss. Composed during a Clapton
visit to Helsinki, it was inspired by a gracious host named "Laila" --
the wife of then Assistant Ambassador David Heil."


Stupid Lee (Stagger Lee@ houston-hunks.com) provides yet another
example of his idiocy in
:
"That's because transmission line loss and SWR are not directly
related."

wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
Saggytits Oyen wrote:
On 15 Jun 2006 04:54:41 -0700, Not Cocksucker Lloyd Secwet Woger wrote:
: You direct the same words at almost everyone who takes the time to mock
: your many shortcomings; such as your inability to construct logical
[FLUSH]

Your post was plagiarized

So was yours, ****tard. Say hi to Chelsea who really owns your house in
Phoenix!

Here's how Saggytits works, he takes a cut and paste adds a few words
to it, and tries to pass it off as his own.
get help

Stagger Lee wrote:
On 15 Jun 2006 04:54:41 -0700, Not Cocksucker Lloyd Secwet Woger wrote:
: You direct the same words at almost everyone who takes the time to mock
: your many shortcomings; such as your inability to construct logical
[FLUSH]

Your post was plagiarized directly from
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a...e=source&hl=en

As always, you are incapable of original prose or thought.
and likely derected at HIM in the first place ( i did not bother to
check

an old friend wrote:
wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
Saggytits Oyen wrote:
On 15 Jun 2006 04:54:41 -0700, Not Cocksucker Lloyd Secwet Woger wrote:
: You direct the same words at almost everyone who takes the time to mock
: your many shortcomings; such as your inability to construct logical
[FLUSH]

Your post was plagiarized

So was yours, ****tard. Say hi to Chelsea who really owns your house in
Phoenix!

Here's how Saggytits works, he takes a cut and paste adds a few words
to it, and tries to pass it off as his own.
get

Quit spamming, dumbass!

wrote:
an old freind wrote:
and likely derected at HIM in the first place ( i did not bother to
check

You lack the capability.
wrog again I could hae clicked on the link provided I just did not care
get help wismen