Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#51
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"David G. Nagel" wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: hayseed wrote: Now, everybody, back to work and mind your p's and Qs How about dropping rec.radio.shortwave from the news group list. Thanks in advance. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#52
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David G. Nagel wrote:
How about IDEA pronounced "IDEer" Y'all from Boston? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#53
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Cecil Moore wrote: David G. Nagel wrote: How about IDEA pronounced "IDEer" Y'all from Boston? No. How about dropping rec.radio.shorwave from the thread. Thanks in advance. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#54
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Telamon wrote:
In article , "David G. Nagel" wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: hayseed wrote: Now, everybody, back to work and mind your p's and Qs How about dropping rec.radio.shortwave from the news group list. Thanks in advance. -- Telamon Ventura, California Did I get ripped off? |
#55
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
jawod wrote: yes at least to me "last year's work" as opposed to some other "year's work" pretty sure that's possessive A year is an it. Is it possessive because it's its work? How did this get started? ![]() Whose on first? No answer on the antenna trickle charger? |
#56
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telamon wrote:
In article , Cecil Moore wrote: David G. Nagel wrote: How about IDEA pronounced "IDEer" Y'all from Boston? No. How about dropping rec.radio.shorwave from the thread. Why are you posting in re.radio.amateur.antenna, Telemon? - 73 de Mike KB3EIA - |
#57
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "New Ham" wrote in message ... In article , Telamon wrote: In article , "David G. Nagel" wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: hayseed wrote: Now, everybody, back to work and mind your p's and Qs How about dropping rec.radio.shortwave from the news group list. Thanks in advance. -- Telamon Ventura, California Did I get ripped off? Did you get kissed afterwards?? |
#58
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
RHF wrote:
Dave wrote: "The SWR with the apostrophe s is a grammatical error. The apostrophe s indicates that the SWR is possessive, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PLURALS - When you add an 's' to make a plural, it NEVER takes an apostrophe. Never. There are no exceptions. As much as I hate plurals formed with apostrophes, you're wrong. -- Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics http://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm |
#59
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sal M. Onella wrote:
3. Despite the absolute correctness of the apostrophe for the plural of numbers and letters, I see a lot of acronyms and abbreviations made plural by the addition of an "s" without the apostrophe and I don't flinch. From what I remember, that's not universally incorrect. Oh, and I'm taking your apostrophe quiz, and it appears there's an error in the "correct" choice: (B) uses "its" as the contraction for "it is". So the answer to 17 should be "None of the above". (I scored 100% also.) Incidental note: I've never understood how people who use "it's" as a possessive never even think to use "hi's" (though some use "her's" and "their's"). -- Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics http://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm |
#60
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Did you know that when Jesus prayed to God in Aramaic, he probably prayed to "Allah"? I doubt it. The word Allah appears to be a conglomeration of "al elah", meaning "the god". -- Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics http://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|