Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Young wrote:
"Henry Kolesnik" wrote in message m... I'm not certain to which group I should post this question, so I'm shot gunning hoping to find it. If anyone can point me, please do. However.... Has anyone used the HP 3582A audio spectrum analyzer to plot the freq response of audio devices like mikes, speakers, etc. Knowing the mike response I'd like to see the spectrum of plucked guitar strings and their harmonics and see how different manufacturers sound varies in a plot. I got a 3582A at a swap meet, its complex and probably overkill but that's what I have and I am anxious to try it out and would appreciate any tips. Thanks Another option, FWIW, is to use the PC to capture and analyze. The audible spectrum would seem to be quite unchallenging for common desktops. Compression schemes such as MP3 and WMA, after all, operate on the frequency domain. In fact, Windows Media Player delivers the FFT stream to visualization modules. There's likely free software somewhere that can do what you're looking to do. OTOH, you then have the soundcard's non-linearities to deal with, which is likely not on par with lab or even studio grade equipment. Actually, pretty much any modern PC audio card will have plenty low enough distortion for the application, and quite likely better than the HP3582. The 3582, is, after all, quite an old instrument. The advent of digital audio changed the whole playing field for audio range ADCs and DACs, as well as support parts like op amps (though codecs as used in most inexpensive PC audio systems don't need additional preams on their inputs anyway). Frequency response at the low end can be an issue; there are many vibrations that are too low in frequency for a sound card to deal with. Think "seismic" and you'll understand. The AC coupling in the HP E1433 is programmable to very low frequencies, as it's actually a feedback control system run through the DSP following the ADC, but most AC coupling will have a 3dB corner frequency around 1Hz, or higher if it's really just for audio. Sound cards may well use codecs whose ADCs have digital AC coupling, as well, and the card may not provide a way to turn that off. Another package that can be used to do FFTs on captured audio, and to otherwise manipulate the audio file, is the free Scilab package. You can play to your heart's content with math functions on the audio (or on pretty much anything else you can represent numerically), but of course you can get yourself into trouble if you don't understand what you're doing. And along those lines, I'd strongly caution you to not read too much into what Scott wrote, "Yes, lots of people have used HP FFT analyzers for all kinds of things. There isn't a lot of trickery... they pretty much work." The _analyzers_ may work, but if you don't understand what they do, you may make very bad measurements with them, and you may badly misinterpret the results you see. There are, I believe, HP/Agilent ap notes on making _good_ measurements and properly interpreting the results. Well, I KNOW there are, though finding them on the web may be a bit of a challenge. Cheers, Tom |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "K7ITM" wrote in message ups.com... Mike Young wrote: "Henry Kolesnik" wrote in message m... I'm not certain to which group I should post this question, so I'm shot gunning hoping to find it. If anyone can point me, please do. However.... Has anyone used the HP 3582A audio spectrum analyzer to plot the freq response of audio devices like mikes, speakers, etc. Knowing the mike response I'd like to see the spectrum of plucked guitar strings and their harmonics and see how different manufacturers sound varies in a plot. I got a 3582A at a swap meet, its complex and probably overkill but that's what I have and I am anxious to try it out and would appreciate any tips. Thanks Another option, FWIW, is to use the PC to capture and analyze. The audible spectrum would seem to be quite unchallenging for common desktops. Compression schemes such as MP3 and WMA, after all, operate on the frequency domain. In fact, Windows Media Player delivers the FFT stream to visualization modules. There's likely free software somewhere that can do what you're looking to do. OTOH, you then have the soundcard's non-linearities to deal with, which is likely not on par with lab or even studio grade equipment. Actually, pretty much any modern PC audio card will have plenty low enough distortion for the application, and quite likely better than the HP3582. The 3582, is, after all, quite an old instrument. The advent of digital audio changed the whole playing field for audio range ADCs and DACs, as well as support parts like op amps (though codecs as used in most inexpensive PC audio systems don't need additional preams on their inputs anyway). Frequency response at the low end can be an issue; there are many vibrations that are too low in frequency for a sound card to deal with. Think "seismic" and you'll understand. The AC coupling in the HP E1433 is programmable to very low frequencies, as it's actually a feedback control system run through the DSP following the ADC, but most AC coupling will have a 3dB corner frequency around 1Hz, or higher if it's really just for audio. Sound cards may well use codecs whose ADCs have digital AC coupling, as well, and the card may not provide a way to turn that off. Another package that can be used to do FFTs on captured audio, and to otherwise manipulate the audio file, is the free Scilab package. You can play to your heart's content with math functions on the audio (or on pretty much anything else you can represent numerically), but of course you can get yourself into trouble if you don't understand what you're doing. And along those lines, I'd strongly caution you to not read too much into what Scott wrote, "Yes, lots of people have used HP FFT analyzers for all kinds of things. There isn't a lot of trickery... they pretty much work." The _analyzers_ may work, but if you don't understand what they do, you may make very bad measurements with them, and you may badly misinterpret the results you see. There are, I believe, HP/Agilent ap notes on making _good_ measurements and properly interpreting the results. Well, I KNOW there are, though finding them on the web may be a bit of a challenge. Cheers, Tom Hi- there is a HP newsgroup on Yahoo, try that. Jim. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
HP 3582A ? | Homebrew | |||
HP 3582A ? | Homebrew |