Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
All,
I've been hearing how winding coils on discarded plastic pill bottles is not suitable for RF tank circuits due to low Q, and that these would not be safe for tube circuits anyway due to melting point. I have access to kaolinite clay (white porcelain) and a kiln, and I was wondering if I molded and fired this type of clay for coil forms, what effect on a tank circuit Q this form would have. Thanks in advance, The Eternal Squire |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
ups.com... I've been hearing how winding coils on discarded plastic pill bottles is not suitable for RF tank circuits due to low Q, and that these would not be safe for tube circuits anyway due to melting point. What frequencies are your coils going to be operating at? I'd be really surprised if pill bottles had any significant loss at HF. You must be talking pretty high power designs if you're able to melt plastic! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
All, I've been hearing how winding coils on discarded plastic pill bottles is not suitable for RF tank circuits due to low Q, and that these would not be safe for tube circuits anyway due to melting point. I have access to kaolinite clay (white porcelain) and a kiln, and I was wondering if I molded and fired this type of clay for coil forms, what effect on a tank circuit Q this form would have. Thanks in advance, The Eternal Squire There will be very little effect on Q of an inductor wound on a 1/16" to 1/8" thick wall of translucent plastic as used in pill bottles...as compared to ceramic or epoxy-paper or other plastics as used in commercial coil formers. A quick check on any Q Meter will prove that. [I've done that out of curiosity many many years ago and little change] A visual clue is the old B&W "coil stock" of heavy wire held in place by cemented-on strips of polystyrene (usually in four strips per long coil stock, equidistant around the circumference. Those were used in the 50s and 60s primarily in tube amplifier circuits under about 200 W. Using ceramic formers for anything under 400 W (give or take) power level is overkill in insulation. Back in the 30s and 40s use of ceramic was easy in the industry (plastics industry hadn't developed far yet for electronics applications)...so already-in- place ceramics work was an easy way to go for manufacturers of "radio parts." That led many to believe that ceramic forms are "necessary." The BEST way to go is to sit down and do some grunge work of calculation of RF currents and voltages in a power amplifier L-C network...to see what ACTUAL loss will do insofar as heat dissipation. Q - as measured - will be the same a low or high power levels so the measurements at low levels will still apply to high power applications. If heat dissipation is a real concern, then that can be simulated with simple AC through a resistance wound around the former in question. Any resistance wire will do, such as the elements out of an old toaster, hair dryer, etc. Set the low frequency power dissipation the same as what was calculated for RF and watch the results. By the way, some pill bottles are still molded from polystyrenes with some high end medications stuffed in (of all things) polycarbonate (expensive) containers. The much-storied "Q Dope" (supposedly so great to use on small coils, which it isn't in longevity) is polystyrene with lots of solvent. Q Dope will pull away from most surfaces ("lifts") after several months due to adsorbed moisture in the air, losing some of its good properties. Spar or boat varnish (from petroleum products) is better and longer-lasting, doesn't smell as good as Q Dope but can also be used on floors and furniture. I use McCloskey "Gym Seal" myself...rather expensive in do-it-yourself stores, though. Just having some kind of ceramic molded is never a panacea. Without some good RF dielectric loss measurement gear you won't be able to know if the ceramic mix has strange stuff in it that could result in it being a lossy dielectric. Some ceramic coffee mugs can heat up by themselves due to trace-whatevers fired in with the ceramic. That indicates a dielectric loss at 2.4 GHz...but you won't know what the effect is at lower RF without measuring it. I would say you have a needless worry on former material. If you want to fire your own ceramics, go for it! :-) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: BRAND-NEW USA MADE RACK-HANDLES & CERAMIC SWITCHES | Equipment | |||
FA: BRAND-NEW USA MADE RACK-HANDLES & CERAMIC SWITCHES | CB | |||
FA: BRAND-NEW USA MADE RACK-HANDLES & CERAMIC SWITCHES | Shortwave | |||
Will displacement current form a close loop ? | Antenna | |||
Form factor for inductances | Antenna |