Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
All right, I think I might have found the proper place to ask about
this. Back in the 90's when GEnie was still around, they had plans to convert old AM car radios to shortwave receivers. My old Franklin ACE 500 computer wasn't capable of interpreting the file at the time, so I didn't get to download it. I'm hoping someone here might know where I could get the instructions. I know, I could just get off my lazy ass, get an ARRL manual and figure it out for myself, but if there's an easier option, I'd like to go for it. All I'm looking for is something that will pick up broadcasts between upper AM and the scanner frequencies. By the way, my hotmail account isn't working, so emailing me won't do any good. Please post where I can find what I'm looking for here. Thanks. Ralph Glatt |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() julian814 wrote: All right, I think I might have found the proper place to ask about this. Back in the 90's when GEnie was still around, they had plans to convert old AM car radios to shortwave receivers. My old Franklin ACE 500 computer wasn't capable of interpreting the file at the time, so I didn't get to download it. I'm hoping someone here might know where I could get the instructions. Ralph Glatt Andy writes: In my opinion, the easiest, most non-destructive way to do this is to add a converter, using the AM radio as a tuneable IF for AM transmissions. A two transistor converter, using a xtal oscillator and a mixer, can easily do this. Just select the xtal frequency to be about 1000 Khz above or below the middle of the shortwave band you want. I am assuming you are only interested in AM shortwave broadcasts. Any of the other modes would require modification to the inside of the AM radio.... Anyway, the neat thing about this approach is that no modification needs to be done to the innards of the AM radio......And you can still listen to Rush Limbaugh by switching off the converter.... If, on the other hand, you want to modify the AM radio to short wave without adding anything significant, it depends entirely on the circuit. In general, you will rewind a bunch of coils, which means you need equipment for testing and measuring. There are some AM radio designs that are such that success is extremely unlikely while others are fairly straightforward ---- it's like asking "how much does a rock weigh?" I encourage the CONVERTER approach.... Good luck with your project. These weekenders can be a lot of fun and very educational... Andy W4OAH in Eureka, Texas |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() AndyS wrote: In my opinion, the easiest, most non-destructive way to do this is to add a converter, using the AM radio as a tuneable IF for AM transmissions. A two transistor converter, using a xtal oscillator and a mixer, can easily do this. Just select the xtal frequency to be about 1000 Khz above or below the middle of the shortwave band you want. I am assuming you are only interested in AM shortwave broadcasts. Any of the other modes would require modification to the inside of the AM radio.... Anyway, the neat thing about this approach is that no modification needs to be done to the innards of the AM radio......And you can still listen to Rush Limbaugh by switching off the converter.... If, on the other hand, you want to modify the AM radio to short wave without adding anything significant, it depends entirely on the circuit. In general, you will rewind a bunch of coils, which means you need equipment for testing and measuring. There are some AM radio designs that are such that success is extremely unlikely while others are fairly straightforward ---- it's like asking "how much does a rock weigh?" I encourage the CONVERTER approach.... Good luck with your project. These weekenders can be a lot of fun and very educational... Andy W4OAH in Eureka, Texas Thanks, Andy. I think I've managed to find something a little better than what I had in mind, anyway - Lindsay books sells a series of books called the Impoverished Radio Experimenter. I've ordered two of them that seem likely to have the information I need. My only concern now is being able to run a tube receiver off of battery power, but I'm hoping I can figure out something on my own. Ralph Glatt |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"AndyS" wrote in 1165840350.029509.309650@
79g2000cws.googlegroups.com: In my opinion, the easiest, most non-destructive way to do this is to add a converter, using the AM radio as a tuneable IF for AM transmissions. Agreed. And you can still listen to Rush Limbaugh by switching off the converter.... Or when you switch it on... http://www.techlib.com/files/rushconv.pdf Pick your 1MHz band, and tune away. You'll need to tweek a bit if you want to be very far from 15 MHz. -- David Hatch KR7DH |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David wrote: http://www.techlib.com/files/rushconv.pdf Pick your 1MHz band, and tune away. You'll need to tweek a bit if you want to be very far from 15 MHz. -- David Hatch KR7DH Andy comments: Excellent, David !!! Thanks for the circuit. Note that it can easily be modified to get WWV also...... I suspect one could use a CA3028 if one wanted to build it with a single IC, for some reason... Yet another simple converter can be made using a NE602. I don't have a circuit handy, but it can easily be designed from the data sheet. Andy W4OAH PS I'm going to check out 15.42 Mhz --- I hadn't messed with it before..... |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David ) writes:
Pick your 1MHz band, and tune away. You'll need to tweek a bit if you want to be very far from 15 MHz. If you choose the 31 and 25 metre bands you can receive both with one crystal in the oscillator. Many years ago I built a simple converter using a 10.7 MHz crystal and a tunable front end so I could tune 31 m band (osc on the high side) and the 25 m band (osc on the low side). Don't remember now where I got the circuit but it worked very well with a standard (in those days!) car radio antenna. .... Martin VE3OAT |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
julian814 wrote:
AndyS wrote: Andy W4OAH in Eureka, Texas Thanks, Andy. I think I've managed to find something a little better than what I had in mind, anyway - Lindsay books sells a series of books called the Impoverished Radio Experimenter. I've ordered two of them that seem likely to have the information I need. My only concern now is being able to run a tube receiver off of battery power, but I'm hoping I can figure out something on my own. Ralph Glatt TUBES!! Tubes? Off of Battery, 6 Volt?, Vibrator? Inverter? 12 Volt B+ tubes ? Not since the 1950s ? Am I reading too much between the lines ? Yukio YANO, VE5YS Except for the audio output stage, we can now run a radio on the power used to to light the Dial on a Tubes Era Radio ! |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Yukio YANO wrote: TUBES!! Tubes? Off of Battery, 6 Volt?, Vibrator? Inverter? 12 Volt B+ tubes ? Not since the 1950s ? Am I reading too much between the lines ? Yukio YANO, VE5YS Except for the audio output stage, we can now run a radio on the power used to to light the Dial on a Tubes Era Radio ! Andy writes: Well, perhaps the OP is a "retro" hobbyist. I have met a few, especially youngsters who weren't born till after the ua709 was developed. Sort of a historical fascination.... Personally, I have had the hell shocked out of me enough to appreciate the privilege of using 14 volts or less (grin)... Around here, you can usually pick up a transistorized car radio for about a dollar at garage sales and resale barns. I have yet to buy one that didn't work. If you come to Eureka, Texas, I'll give you one for free...... Andy W4OAH in Eureka, Texas ( If you've ever taken a beer to a job interview, you might live in Eureka, Texas ) |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Yukio YANO wrote: TUBES!! Tubes? Off of Battery, 6 Volt?, Vibrator? Inverter? 12 Volt B+ tubes ? Not since the 1950s ? Am I reading too much between the lines ? Yes, tubes. I have some that were pulled from circa 1960's television sets, and I thought I'd use them, hoping that they'd be EMP resistant. Been on kind of a survivalist kick, lately. Doesn't mean I'd be opposed to using more modern equipment, though. One thing I saw that I liked in one of the books I purchased was a loop antenna that uses transistors to amplify the signal. Thought it might be easier than stringing up a lot of wire. ;-) Ralph Glatt |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David wrote: "AndyS" wrote in 1165840350.029509.309650@ 79g2000cws.googlegroups.com: In my opinion, the easiest, most non-destructive way to do this is to add a converter, using the AM radio as a tuneable IF for AM transmissions. Agreed. And you can still listen to Rush Limbaugh by switching off the converter.... Or when you switch it on... http://www.techlib.com/files/rushconv.pdf Pick your 1MHz band, and tune away. You'll need to tweek a bit if you want to be very far from 15 MHz. I'm not that terribly fond of Rush, but I think I might be able to adapt this to tune in other frequencies, so it should come in handy. Thanks! Ralph Glatt |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|