Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Here is what my response to Mr. Schleck would be on his proposed moderated newsgroup: Mr. Paul W. Schleck: I would question your ability to be a fair and just moderator. I have participated in the rec.radio.amateur.??? newsgroups, I have witnessed your abilities and goals. There, I have seen you and your extra class henchmen attempt to constantly steer the course of its' flow, intimidation and threats have often been your tools. I have watched you and others look down upon other amateurs who will now be allowed to take a "No Code Amateur Exam." In no way have I ever seen you be even close to being "fair" or "just" in your opinions, judgments, statements, etc. I have heard many in that group call the present amateur exams "dumbed down." Here, you have blatantly lied as to your purposes. You seek a forum where a very limited band of ideas, concepts, beliefs and discussion can take forth. You seek to establish a "class based newsgroup", this class system will VERY MUCH depend on the ancient art of morse code and the amateur exam. If any here doubt, they only have to sift though the old posts and check past posts of you and those you name as would be-moderators and they will know. What I say, I say with great belief. You wish to establish a "masonic temple type of brotherhood" here in the public newsgroups. You and a few of your cronies wish to establish tight and strict control over this group. And, from what I can see and guess to your goals, you do this SOLELY for the purpose of stroking your own egos. Many of the "weirdos", hecklers and vulgar individuals in the other amateur groups are due to you and those sharing your same views and using your "street smart" methods--in effect, your "control freak" attitude and "better-than-thou" stance has created them. It would serve justice if you were forced to stay and learn to "get along and play well" with the other "children." Your words show a fine demonstration of stealth and deception; I don't believe I have ever seen a better example than you have presented to us here. I certainly would nominate you for the "Silver Tongue Award." However, I would certainly NOT vote to allow you to slink and sneak off from the tragedy you have helped to create. Although you make this request and proposal out of your personal need to feed your ego, and surround yourself with those who would feed your ego for you, and "live in your own little world", I think it would be a crime to allow you to do so. The potential you have to abuse this proposed-moderated newsgroup to the detriment of others demands it should not be allowed ... I for one would vote NO, but then, you already knew that ... Regards, John Smith I |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Smith I" wrote in message ... Here is what my response to Mr. Schleck would be on his proposed moderated newsgroup: Mr. Paul W. Schleck: I would question your ability to be a fair and just moderator. I have participated in the rec.radio.amateur.??? newsgroups, I have witnessed your abilities and goals. There, I have seen you and your extra class henchmen attempt to constantly steer the course of its' flow, intimidation and threats have often been your tools. I have watched you and others look down upon other amateurs who will now be allowed to take a "No Code Amateur Exam." In no way have I ever seen you be even close to being "fair" or "just" in your opinions, judgments, statements, etc. I have heard many in that group call the present amateur exams "dumbed down." Here, you have blatantly lied as to your purposes. You seek a forum where a very limited band of ideas, concepts, beliefs and discussion can take forth. You seek to establish a "class based newsgroup", this class system will VERY MUCH depend on the ancient art of morse code and the amateur exam. If any here doubt, they only have to sift though the old posts and check past posts of you and those you name as would be-moderators and they will know. What I say, I say with great belief. You wish to establish a "masonic temple type of brotherhood" here in the public newsgroups. You and a few of your cronies wish to establish tight and strict control over this group. And, from what I can see and guess to your goals, you do this SOLELY for the purpose of stroking your own egos. Many of the "weirdos", hecklers and vulgar individuals in the other amateur groups are due to you and those sharing your same views and using your "street smart" methods--in effect, your "control freak" attitude and "better-than-thou" stance has created them. It would serve justice if you were forced to stay and learn to "get along and play well" with the other "children." Your words show a fine demonstration of stealth and deception; I don't believe I have ever seen a better example than you have presented to us here. I certainly would nominate you for the "Silver Tongue Award." However, I would certainly NOT vote to allow you to slink and sneak off from the tragedy you have helped to create. Although you make this request and proposal out of your personal need to feed your ego, and surround yourself with those who would feed your ego for you, and "live in your own little world", I think it would be a crime to allow you to do so. The potential you have to abuse this proposed-moderated newsgroup to the detriment of others demands it should not be allowed ... I for one would vote NO, but then, you already knew that ... Regards, John Smith I OK John, clean up this newsgroup so I don't have to add filters on an almost daily basis to eliminate the constant deluge of sex posts, vulgar posts, etc. Dee, N8UZE |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dee Flint wrote:
... OK John, clean up this newsgroup so I don't have to add filters on an almost daily basis to eliminate the constant deluge of sex posts, vulgar posts, etc. Dee, N8UZE Dee: There I agree with you 100%. The vulgarity and sheer non-sense makes me embarrassed for them. I cringe at the mental state they must exist in to wish to provide such a display in front of women and younger users here. I fear that this does not just exist in the newsgroups, here with us, but also is becoming "something bad" in America ![]() I can only admire you in finding the tools and having the determination to be here with us in spite of all that non-sense ... Warmest regards, JS |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Schlecks' Schlock! | Antenna | |||
Schlecks' Schlock! | Boatanchors | |||
Schlecks' Schlock! | Homebrew | |||
David Icke - Total Schlock | Shortwave |