Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I am trying to build a tube power oscillator running at 25MHz from a Russian tube (GI6B), and although I have it running, I can't seem to ramp up the power to anywhere near the level I want out of it. I am aiming for 200 to 400 watts, but I seem to be running at just a handful of watts. Everything I have tried that I assumed would control this parameter seems to have failed to work... The RF is needed not to transmit but to drive a plasma, but for now I just want to get the tank coil running the right voltage level. But with a B+ of about 1000V, I am only getting about 50 volts in the tank coil. Circuit diagram is available here http://geocities.com/peterpion/oscillator.jpg Parameters a Voltage = 1000V, full wave rectified and smoothed Tank coil, 5mm copper tube, 7 turns, 5cm diameter, 7cm long, 1.3uH Tank Cap, air dielectric, 5mm spacing, 13cm square, 31pF, 1.6mm thick copper plates Tank circuit is capable of taking at least 100A, very heavily soldered Feedback coil, 5 turns 2mm copper wire, same diameter as tank coil, 5 cm length, placed on same former with gap of 3cm between tank and feedback coil. B+ choke 120 turns on 32mm diameter former Bias, external 12V supply, fed via a diode to the ground side of the grid coil, with a 33k resistor going to ground from the same point, bypassed by a 1nF cap. Although I have it running, both increasing or decreasing the feedback turns reduces the tank voltage. The tube spec is 350W anode dissipation, mu of 18-26, 2.5KV max, but with heavy grid current requirements it seems, although I am not quite clear on this. http://www.nd2x.net/gi6b.html Ive never built anything like this before, and I am lost as to where I am going wrong. Is it that the tube has too little gain to drive itself up to those power levels? I assumed that the low gain would just mean that I had to couple more power back to the grid to make it work. But if I increase the turns on the feedback winding, it actually reduces the power - as does reducing the turns. 5 seems to be optimum. I have taken care to keep all leads short - very short (1 to 3 inches mostly). Rats nest construction. Have tried several types of caps, all apparently rated for heavy RF use. Even rolled my own caps from copper sheet and polyethelene which work the same as the other caps. On the scope, I can see that I never drive the grid into positive. This seems wrong to me, but nothing I do makes it go positive. On the plate, all I see on the scope is a tiny 50v drop (at 25MHz) when the tube is supposedly hard on, ie the tube at the most on condition through the cycle, still has about 950V across it. So I assume that I am not turning the grid on enough. I am wondering if the problem is gain, IE is there too little gain to make it work properly? Do I need to add another tube in a darlington type of arrangement to add enough gain to make it work better? I want this type of free running oscillator because it should stay in tune as I add small amounts of reactive load (the plasma during warm up etc) - or at least thats what I believe, not being an RF guru I am not certain of this. If anyone can help me I would appreciate it very much. Having spent the last 2 weeks trying, and read everything I can and searched the web extensivley, I am at a bit of a loss as to what to do next. I do apologise for probably stupid mistakes / questions (you cant do that! you need a driver stage...? who knows!) but I am sure someone must have done this before so I appeal to them to share their experience! Thanks, Pete |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the fact that you do not have a load on the output tank, is what is
limiting the power output. Power tubes require a particular load Z to deliver 'rated' power. Right now all I see is a parallel LC tank which will be high Z. You quote a voltage of 50V "in the tank coil". How are you measuring this? Can you monitor plate current? If so, that times the applied plate voltage will give you your DC input power. Power out will always be less than this amount. Also, are you sure your HV supply has the current capacity for the 200-400W you want to get out? (This may mean something like 300-600W, or more, DC input power). Are you taking steps to prevent radiation of the generated RF into the wider environment? The level of power you are talking can reek havoc with other licensed users. The FCC could pay you a visit. Finally, BE CAREFUL! These DC voltages can kill, and you have not lived until you have gotten an RF burn from 100W, much less 300-400W. Bob WB0POQ wrote in message oups.com... Hi, I am trying to build a tube power oscillator running at 25MHz from a Russian tube (GI6B), and although I have it running, I can't seem to ramp up the power to anywhere near the level I want out of it. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Bob thanks for the attention,
Re the load, I am using a soft iron 'poker' which I bring close to / into the tank coil to provide a load which I can easily tell when power is delivered into. So I fire the circuit up with the scope connected to a certain point, then increase the load by bringing the poker closer to or into the coil. The iron looks like a very close to resistance load, the Z varies with the proximity. So I cat test all loads from high Z to a few ohms. If the iron gets hot, I am delivering a decent amount of power - got some decent power with a circuit like this running at 7 MHz with the iron getting very hot. While doing this I monitor the voltage on the plate or tank coil with a scope. So the 50V is the best peak to peak voltage across the tank coil. Loading the circuit more reduces the pp voltage in the tank. And since the tank Z is about 200R, p=e(squared)/r so p=1.6 watts in the tank circuit. Plate current is around 100mA but this is mostly dumped into the anode as heat. PSU is half amp MOT plus variac, bridge rectifier and 10uF cap. Shunts are removed from MOT. Plenty of power available, about 1kW. As for shielding, when running at full power the whole thing will be screened including the load. Till then though, the tops off although I dont think that much will radiate from the exposed leads even when the power gets up to decent levels. As for RF burns, yes I am rather nervous about that too... I am used to working around up to about 20kv but this RF angle is a new thing, so I am being cautious. Painful experience is the best way to learn your lesson and I have had it :-( Anyway thanks for the suggestions. On Jul 25, 10:09 pm, "Bob Liesenfeld" wrote: I think the fact that you do not have a load on the output tank, is what is limiting the power output. Power tubes require a particular load Z to deliver 'rated' power. Right now all I see is a parallel LC tank which will be high Z. You quote a voltage of 50V "in the tank coil". How are you measuring this? Can you monitor plate current? If so, that times the applied plate voltage will give you your DC input power. Power out will always be less than this amount. Also, are you sure your HV supply has the current capacity for the 200-400W you want to get out? (This may mean something like 300-600W, or more, DC input power). Are you taking steps to prevent radiation of the generated RF into the wider environment? The level of power you are talking can reek havoc with other licensed users. The FCC could pay you a visit. Finally, BE CAREFUL! These DC voltages can kill, and you have not lived until you have gotten an RF burn from 100W, much less 300-400W. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Loading the circuit more reduces the pp voltage in the tank. And since the tank Z is about 200R, p=e(squared)/r so p=1.6 watts in the tank circuit. Where are you getting the "200R" value from? (And what is 'R'?) Another thought is to change the L/C ratio which should give a different loaded Q with a given poker position. This may provide more power out. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:22:56 -0500, Bob Liesenfeld wrote:
Loading the circuit more reduces the pp voltage in the tank. And since the tank Z is about 200R, p=e(squared)/r so p=1.6 watts in the tank circuit. Where are you getting the "200R" value from? (And what is 'R'?) 200R is British for 200 ohms. (which does seem a bit low for a proper match, for 1kv plate voltage and ~300w RF out shouldn't the tank Z be closer to 3,000 ohms?) (or is my sleep deprivation showing?) |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Also... borrow a GHz Spectrum Analyser and chech that the unit is
running at the expected freq. What bandwidth is your scope ? An anode APC is also a very good idea. A few turn of 16AWG around a 2W 4R7 maybe a good start. Any chance of cranking Va up to 1500V just to see how much power increases ? Don't forget a fresh change of underwear and a fire extiguisher ![]() Regards, Mark On Jul 26, 8:53 pm, Steve H wrote: wrote: Hi, I am trying to build a tube power oscillator running at 25MHz from a Russian tube (GI6B), and although I have it running, I can't seem to ramp up the power to anywhere near the level I want out of it. I am aiming for 200 to 400 watts, but I seem to be running at just a handful of watts. Everything I have tried that I assumed would control this parameter seems to have failed to work... The RF is needed not to transmit but to drive a plasma, but for now I just want to get the tank coil running the right voltage level. But with a B+ of about 1000V, I am only getting about 50 volts in the tank coil. Circuit diagram is available herehttp://geocities.com/peterpion/oscillator.jpg Parameters a Voltage = 1000V, full wave rectified and smoothed Tank coil, 5mm copper tube, 7 turns, 5cm diameter, 7cm long, 1.3uH Tank Cap, air dielectric, 5mm spacing, 13cm square, 31pF, 1.6mm thick copper plates Tank circuit is capable of taking at least 100A, very heavily soldered Feedback coil, 5 turns 2mm copper wire, same diameter as tank coil, 5 cm length, placed on same former with gap of 3cm between tank and feedback coil. B+ choke 120 turns on 32mm diameter former Bias, external 12V supply, fed via a diode to the ground side of the grid coil, with a 33k resistor going to ground from the same point, bypassed by a 1nF cap. Although I have it running, both increasing or decreasing the feedback turns reduces the tank voltage. The tube spec is 350W anode dissipation, mu of 18-26, 2.5KV max, but with heavy grid current requirements it seems, although I am not quite clear on this. http://www.nd2x.net/gi6b.html Ive never built anything like this before, and I am lost as to where I am going wrong. Is it that the tube has too little gain to drive itself up to those power levels? I assumed that the low gain would just mean that I had to couple more power back to the grid to make it work. But if I increase the turns on the feedback winding, it actually reduces the power - as does reducing the turns. 5 seems to be optimum. I have taken care to keep all leads short - very short (1 to 3 inches mostly). Rats nest construction. Have tried several types of caps, all apparently rated for heavy RF use. Even rolled my own caps from copper sheet and polyethylene which work the same as the other caps. On the scope, I can see that I never drive the grid into positive. This seems wrong to me, but nothing I do makes it go positive. On the plate, all I see on the scope is a tiny 50v drop (at 25MHz) when the tube is supposedly hard on, ie the tube at the most on condition through the cycle, still has about 950V across it. So I assume that I am not turning the grid on enough. I am wondering if the problem is gain, IE is there too little gain to make it work properly? Do I need to add another tube in a Darlington type of arrangement to add enough gain to make it work better? I want this type of free running oscillator because it should stay in tune as I add small amounts of reactive load (the plasma during warm up etc) - or at least thats what I believe, not being an RF guru I am not certain of this. If anyone can help me I would appreciate it very much. Having spent the last 2 weeks trying, and read everything I can and searched the web extensively, I am at a bit of a loss as to what to do next. I do apologize for probably stupid mistakes / questions (you cant do that! you need a driver stage...? who knows!) but I am sure someone must have done this before so I appeal to them to share their experience! Thanks, Pete With only 1KV on the anode you are unlikely to get more than 40W out. You need to be nearer to 2.5KV with a lot of cooling to get anywhere near 400W. Good layout is vital with this tube, they are good to 3GHz and will take off without some sort of stopper in the anode cct. Steve H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well im not completley certain - heres some of my maths.
Far as I have read, for Class C operations, Load Z should = Plate voltage/2 * Plate current And since I am aiming for plate current of 300mA or so (for power of 300 watts at 1kV) then thats 1000/2*0.3 = about 1500 ohms (R). Then tank Z should = load Z / Q For a Q of 7.5, which is slightly below average I think, thats 1500/7.5 which is 200R tank Z. Then via Xl = 2piFL, Xl is 2 * 3.14 * 25M * 1.3u which = 204R and via Xc = 1/2piFC, Xc is 1 / ( 2 * 3.14 * 25M * 30p) which = 212R So the tuned circuit is going to buzz at a slightly higher F than 25MHz but only slightly, at a Z of about 208R. I think stray values are larger than the difference here so this is not worth worrying about. Thats my understanding of the maths having studied it over the last few weeks and I am pretty sure its in the right ballpark, although the Z could be a bit high or a bit low for the tube conditions. But since the thing buzzes at 25MHz the F is right, and if the Z is a bit off this just means the Q is a bit off and I understand this is not a critical parameter for power. Also to back this up, the tank Z and tank coil and tank cap values are about the same as you see in published designs for this tube (GI6B), this power level, and this frequency (eg http://www.nd2x.net/yu1aw/1xgi7-6m-schem.GIF - its a GI7B but apparently they are almost identical). Ive compared with a few circuits for these tubes and they are all similar. Only thing of course is that they all use grounded grid, which is not anything like the grounded cathode I am using. Of course if I have my tank Z wrong, this would surely cause power problems. But as I say, I cant see anything wrong with these values, but maybe thats my lack of knowledge... Thanks for the help so far... On Jul 26, 4:35 am, Doug Smith W9WI wrote: On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:22:56 -0500, Bob Liesenfeld wrote: Loading the circuit more reduces the pp voltage in the tank. And since the tank Z is about 200R, p=e(squared)/r so p=1.6 watts in the tank circuit. Where are you getting the "200R" value from? (And what is 'R'?) 200R is British for 200 ohms. (which does seem a bit low for a proper match, for 1kv plate voltage and ~300w RF out shouldn't the tank Z be closer to 3,000 ohms?) (or is my sleep deprivation showing?) |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thats interesting - whats a stopper in the anode circuit? The
combination of a resistor and an inductor? And if the tube does take off at 3GHz, will I get fried by the microwaves??! Regarding good layout, what should I be watching out for? Is this just a matter of short leads, or do things like the position of the tank coil relative to the tube matter? Re voltage, I have cranked this up to 2.2kV (its on a variac) with no extra joy - the tube gets very hot very quick (of course) but the tank circuit dosent get any more voltage across it. With only 1KV on the anode you are unlikely to get more than 40W out. You need to be nearer to 2.5KV with a lot of cooling to get anywhere near 400W. Good layout is vital with this tube, they are good to 3GHz and will take off without some sort of stopper in the anode cct. Steve H |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
GHZ spectrum analyser would be a nice bit of kit to borrow, but I dont
know anyone with one - which is a pity. The scope is 40MHz so 25MHz is pretty close to its max and the resolution is not the best. Waveform is fairly symmetrical so I think the fundemental is right at 25MHz. Ill do the APC tonight, what difference will it make? As for 1.5kV - yup, I have had it cranked to full, 2.2kV, and no extra power really (maybe a slight amount, but I am looking for 1kv swing where I am only seeing 50v so its not even close). Underwear got messy... makes the hair on the back of my neck stand up from fear to be that close to a 10u cap charged to 2.2kv...! Also... borrow a GHz Spectrum Analyser and chech that the unit is running at the expected freq. What bandwidth is your scope ? An anode APC is also a very good idea. A few turn of 16AWG around a 2W 4R7 maybe a good start. Any chance of cranking Va up to 1500V just to see how much power increases ? Don't forget a fresh change of underwear and a fire extiguisher ![]() |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Vintage 5 tube working exc. | Swap | |||
R-390A: feeding oscillator tube heaters in DC, w/o regulator tube? | Boatanchors | |||
FA: COLLINS R-390A TUBE Set, S-METER & Crystal Oscillator modules | Equipment | |||
FA: COLLINS R-390A TUBE Set, S-METER & Crystal Oscillator modules | CB | |||
FA: COLLINS R-390A TUBE Set, S-METER & Crystal Oscillator modules | Shortwave |