Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
clifto wrote:
COLIN LAMB wrote: Ok, finally found a single tube 100 kHz. crystal oscillator that uses a neon bulb relaxation oscillator that is synchronized to achieve 10 kHz signals. Phase Locked Lightbulbs? ![]() Not really so bizarre; there are stories of certain computers with light- sensitive neon bulbs in the logic that were affected by ceiling fluorescent lighting when panels were removed from the racks... Regards, Michael |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 02:12:13 -0500, msg wrote:
clifto wrote: COLIN LAMB wrote: Ok, finally found a single tube 100 kHz. crystal oscillator that uses a neon bulb relaxation oscillator that is synchronized to achieve 10 kHz signals. Phase Locked Lightbulbs? ![]() Not really so bizarre; there are stories of certain computers with light- sensitive neon bulbs in the logic that were affected by ceiling fluorescent lighting when panels were removed from the racks... Regards, Michael The trigger point does shift with light or RF. Black paint on the lamp will take care of the light. In my "junk that should have been thrown away" I have a frequency counter that I built from an artical in QST many years back that used 10 neons per digit. Many years after the fact I realized that it might have been more practical if the Neon high voltage had been gated off during the counting phase and on only to display the count. But then it would not have looked nearly as impressive during operation. John Ferrell W8CCW "Life is easier if you learn to plow around the stumps". |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "clifto" wrote in message ... Phase Locked Lightbulbs? ![]() There was a circuit where numerous NE2s were wired on the circumference of a circle as individual relaxation oscillators. At first, the firing pattern was entirely random, but over time the lamps would synchronize and fire in order! The light from an adjacent lamp would lower the firing point the one next to it. Pete |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The neon bulb was a wonderful device for a young boy to play with - and for
those that do not entirely grow up. It energized at about 60 volts, although that varied from tube to tube. ARC-5 receivers used them across their input, to discharge static electricity. They were great for hams with meager funds since you could place one near the final and determine if there were parasitics, by the color of the glow. Sensitivity could be increased by putting a dc voltage on the plates just under what it took to fire. Then, a slight amount of rf would add to that base and fire the bulb. Little pocket testers would distinguish between ac or dc, by simply looling to see whether one or two plates were lighted. Light wuld affect the sensitivity, as well as heat. You could apply a voltage just under the firing voltage, then put your finger near it and it would light. Although I never built one, it probably would have made a great lightning indicator, with directional probes connected to indicate which quadrant the lightning was coming from. As I recall, we used to salvage neon bulbs from old flouroscent light starters. And, of course, they were good for neutralizing those old triode finals. 73, Colin K7FM |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
clifto ) writes:
COLIN LAMB wrote: Ok, finally found a single tube 100 kHz. crystal oscillator that uses a neon bulb relaxation oscillator that is synchronized to achieve 10 kHz signals. Phase Locked Lightbulbs? ![]() Well no, because there's no loop. It wasn't uncommon to inject a bit of signal from one source to an oscillator to synchronize them. That's what was used in oscilliscopes that didn't have triggered sweep. I seem to recall that's what was used to synchronize TV set vertical sweep to the incoming signal. THere were lots of examples. PLL's were too costly and complicated during the tube era for common use, and any real referenfes to PLLs in the hobby magazines didn't arrive till the late fifties. Early seventies, and they were all over the place, because ICs had made them a lot more practical. ANd I suppose there was suddenly a need; after all, most of the early PLL synthesizers described in the ham magazines were for 2M FM use, where crystal control was used in virtually all rigs, but the cost was too much when you wanted a lot of channels. Michael VE2BVW |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Colin
Thats the one, you've confirmed the device line-up,a 4016was incorrectly in the place where a 4013 should have been, so it's no surprise the marker wasn't functioning correctly. There's a separate band-edge marker using a 3.5 MHz xtal. Many thanks de miken, zl1bnb On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:25:26 -0700, "COLIN LAMB" wrote: Hello Miken: I found my 1981 ARRL Handbook. They have a "marker" generator, which uses an LF-353, a 4001 and a 4013 - all integrated circuits. There is also a simple 2 transistor 100 kHz oscillator. The marker generator puts out 100, 50 and 25 kHz. When I read the request for a circuit to supplement a glowbug, I thought a tube crystal calibrator would be what was wanted, and thought perhaps the later 1981 edition might have abandoned a tube version. So, I pulled out a 1972 ARRL Handbook and even then all they had was solid state. If you are going to use integrated circuits in a glowbug receiver, you need to hide them, since it is unbecoming and might cause others to ridicule the otherwise heroic effort to recreate a glorious radio. A simple tube can do a wonderful job of putting out 100 kHz signals, and if you want 50 kHz, you can use a neon bulb divider. Many of the simple receivers I built would have been lost with a 100 kHz marker. A 1 MHz marker would have been more useful, and even then I was guessing at the which MHz it was. The best marker was simply a crystal in the ham band and a known point. Something like 3550 kHz, which could also be used to spot at 7100 kHz. Even odd marked frequencies are useful - then a properly hand calibrated graph laminated on the front panel (ala HRO) will give a feeling that none of the wonderful new rigs can touch. 73, Colin K7FM |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Uncle Peter wrote: "Mark Zenier" wrote in message ... In article , The problem here is that neon bulb relaxation oscillators top out at, according to the charts in the book, at between 10 and 30 kilohertz, depending on bulb type. Mark Zenier Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com) I was curious if there was a limit on the upper frequency, and I was wondering about the waveform as well; that is if the circuit can produce strong harmonics up into the upper HF regions. It would be an interesting project to build! The book is pretty vague on the speed of a discharge. Neon lamps are sloppy parts. They age, their characteristics vary by how much illumination they get from other lights (or built in radiation), they take tens of milliseconds to settle down after they've turned off, etc. So the discharge speed is a pretty loose spec. Scanning the scope photo of a 7 kHz oscillation and feeding it into The Gimp (Linux's equivalent of Photoshop), it looks like the fall time of the sawtooth is about 30 microseconds, out of a total cycle of 140 microseconds. (A 4.7 meg resistor, a 50 pF cap, and an 5AB (a tight spec NE-2), at 140 volts). Even using just the steepest part, it doesn't look like there would be harmonics there much higher than 100-200 kHz. High impedance makes the waveform pretty squishy. Mark Zenier Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Modern Xtal Calibrator? | Boatanchors | |||
WTB: World Radio TV Handbook 1980 | Shortwave | |||
FA: National XCU-300 Xtal Calibrator for NC-303 / NC-300 | Boatanchors | |||
FA: National XCU-300 Xtal Calibrator for NC-303 / NC-300 | Boatanchors | |||
FA: National XCU-300 Xtal Calibrator for NC-303 / NC-300 | Swap |