Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted to two newsgroups known to be read by likely respondents
![]() The published literature on pre-solid-state electronic analog multipliers is scant except for production equipment from analog computer makers (which by now is difficult to locate). One example of a useful technique is a four quadrant electron beam multiplier described he http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/1721...9-04734375.pdf More exotic tubes with curved deflection geometries followed, however obtaining such tubes is now difficult. Has anyone at some point tried using sheet-beam deflection tubes as were used in synchronous detectors and balanced modulator designs for analog multiplication? I imagine that using four tubes each driven by quadrant-limited amplifiers and whose outputs would be biased and summed with scaling may work within a few percent of input values based on a quick look at the characteristic curves published for these tubes. Another option would be to add a magnetic deflection yoke over the tubes to provide a proportional steering of the beam sheet in conjunction with the electro- static deflection (one of the deflection circuits could be placed in the negative feedback loop of an op-amp) to reduce the number of tubes required to two (+/-x, y; +/-x, -y). It wouldn't take long to breadboard a test circuit for investigation, but knowing past efforts is always welcome. Surely someone has evaluated using these tubes in this fashion, even if just for kicks ![]() Michael |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:05:45 -0600, msg wrote:
Posted to two newsgroups known to be read by likely respondents ![]() The published literature on pre-solid-state electronic analog multipliers is scant except for production equipment from analog computer makers (which by now is difficult to locate). One example of a useful technique is a four quadrant electron beam multiplier described he http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/1721...9-04734375.pdf More exotic tubes with curved deflection geometries followed, however obtaining such tubes is now difficult. Has anyone at some point tried using sheet-beam deflection tubes as were used in synchronous detectors and balanced modulator designs for analog multiplication? I imagine that using four tubes each driven by quadrant-limited amplifiers and whose outputs would be biased and summed with scaling may work within a few percent of input values based on a quick look at the characteristic curves published for these tubes. Another option would be to add a magnetic deflection yoke over the tubes to provide a proportional steering of the beam sheet in conjunction with the electro- static deflection (one of the deflection circuits could be placed in the negative feedback loop of an op-amp) to reduce the number of tubes required to two (+/-x, y; +/-x, -y). It wouldn't take long to breadboard a test circuit for investigation, but knowing past efforts is always welcome. Surely someone has evaluated using these tubes in this fashion, even if just for kicks ![]() Michael Two thoughts: 1: x(1 + y) - x(1 - y) = 2xy. Two beam tubes and a couple of op-amps, and you're in business. Even with tube op-amps you may use less space and have less grief from offsets than the space of your quadrant- switching amp and whatever grief you get from same. 2: There are any number of hot-rod DSP chips that'll fit into a T6-1/2 envelope, complete with ADC's, DAC's and a power supply to run off of 6.3VAC. Sealing the glass up without messing up the DSP may be a challenge, but you could always fudge and use acrylic. -- Tim Wescott Control systems and communications consulting http://www.wescottdesign.com Need to learn how to apply control theory in your embedded system? "Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" by Tim Wescott Elsevier/Newnes, http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
msg wrote:
Posted to two newsgroups known to be read by likely respondents ![]() The published literature on pre-solid-state electronic analog multipliers is scant except for production equipment from analog computer makers (which by now is difficult to locate). One example of a useful technique is a four quadrant electron beam multiplier described he http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/1721...9-04734375.pdf More exotic tubes with curved deflection geometries followed, however obtaining such tubes is now difficult. Has anyone at some point tried using sheet-beam deflection tubes as were used in synchronous detectors and balanced modulator designs for analog multiplication? I imagine that using four tubes each driven by quadrant-limited amplifiers and whose outputs would be biased and summed with scaling may work within a few percent of input values based on a quick look at the characteristic curves published for these tubes. Another option would be to add a magnetic deflection yoke over the tubes to provide a proportional steering of the beam sheet in conjunction with the electro- static deflection (one of the deflection circuits could be placed in the negative feedback loop of an op-amp) to reduce the number of tubes required to two (+/-x, y; +/-x, -y). It wouldn't take long to breadboard a test circuit for investigation, but knowing past efforts is always welcome. Surely someone has evaluated using these tubes in this fashion, even if just for kicks ![]() Michael Just a memory from tens of years ago: The 7360 made a decent balanced modulator, but it is, by definition, extremely sensitive for external electric and magnetic fields. -- Tauno Voipio (OH2UG) tauno voipio (at) iki fi |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim Wescott wrote:
snip 2: There are any number of hot-rod DSP chips that'll fit into a T6-1/2 envelope, complete with ADC's, DAC's and a power supply to run off of 6.3VAC. Sealing the glass up without messing up the DSP may be a challenge, but you could always fudge and use acrylic. This would be a new acme in solid-state (Fetron-style) replacements ![]() Michael |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jimmie D wrote:
Just a memory from tens of years ago: The 7360 made a decent balanced modulator, but it is, by definition, extremely sensitive for external electric and magnetic fields. -- Tauno Voipio (OH2UG) tauno voipio (at) iki fi You just answered a problem thats had been nagging me for over 30 years. Now I know why the SSB transmitter I built had such an annoying hum in it. I never thought about it being affected by a magnetic field. ========================================= For that reason in 1970s transceivers like Yaesu FT-400/401 the 7360 used as balanced modulator was 'packed' in a tight metal screen bonded to chassis. Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jimmie D wrote:
Just a memory from tens of years ago: The 7360 made a decent balanced modulator, but it is, by definition, extremely sensitive for external electric and magnetic fields. -- Tauno Voipio (OH2UG) tauno voipio (at) iki fi You just answered a problem thats had been nagging me for over 30 years. Now I know why the SSB transmitter I built had such an annoying hum in it. I never thought about it being affected by a magnetic field. Jimmie Think about a magnetically-deflected TV picture tube. I noticed the problem, when my Eico 753 (around 1968) worked fine when the power supply was on the right side, but had a rough hum reported by other stations, if the power supply box was moved to the other flank. -- Tauno Voipio (OH2UG) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
7360/6AR8 mixer configs | Homebrew | |||
FS 7360, 5763, 6000 Tubes | Boatanchors | |||
Frequency multipliers: Usable modulation formats? | Homebrew | |||
tubes & frequency multipliers | Homebrew | |||
tubes & frequency multipliers | Homebrew |