Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The recent thread discussing W0IYH's new book got me researching Mathcad
version differences and availability of add-ons; I found essentially nothing on the 'net that summarizes versions differences and suspect that reading the release notes from each version would be required to do the job. Has anyone seen such an analysis? I have version 4.0, and from reading archived newsgroup posts it seems that 4.0 and 5.0 were highly regarded, with increasing complaints arising after 6.0. Worksheet (.mcd) file formats were ascii until 7.0, and evidently more recent versions are xml based (do these no longer use a binary file format?) I would like to continue to use 4.0, and I also appreciate that this version is unencumbered with intrusive protection schemes (I choose tools that are designed to work for me and not against me), doesn't need a mysterious installation procedure (just execute the product from its target directory), and has a small footprint but is not memory constrained. Has anyone ever documented the ascii worksheet file format (which could permit a re-writing of later version files to be backward compatible with earlier versions within the constraints of common features)? Does anyone happen to have the DSP "function pack" compatible with 4.0? As described in advertising literature that came with my version, it offers some excellent filter design tools that would provide interactivity missing from the tools that I've been using, and I would enjoy trying them ![]() Michael |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael,
"msg" wrote in message news:er2dnY-QZL0urJHVnZ2dnUVZ_sKqnZ2d@cpinternet... The recent thread discussing W0IYH's new book got me researching Mathcad Has anyone seen such an analysis? I haven't, but I can tell you that version 12 was still just an "enter the product code and it works anywhere" whereas by version 2001 it required Internet activation (presumably with a finite number of activations -- not good if you upgrade computers regularly and and to keep it for awhile). (The versions went 12, 2000, 2001, 2001i, 13, and now 14, AFAIK.) The biggest improvement for me between version 12 and 2001 was that they let you have scales on both the left- and right-hand sides of a graph. There were of course other new features and what-not, that's just the only one I remember caring that much about! The change to an XML file structure (it's ASCII-readable) allows for easy searching of MathCAD files and -- ostensibly -- being able to parse, convert, and create your own MathCAD worksheets programmatically, at least if they actually documented the structure ("schema") reasonably well. (Some companies change to XML just to satisfy some big corporate "checklist" of features required of software and don't publish -- or incompletely publish, as with Microsoft Office -- their schemas.) ---Joel |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hallicrafters S-9 vs SX-9 differences? | Boatanchors | |||
Differences Between Two of the Same Radio | Shortwave | |||
Differences Between Two of the Same Radio | Shortwave | |||
AX.25 version differences | Digital | |||
AX.25 version differences | Digital |