Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In
AF6AY wrote: General Cement's "Strip-X" hasn't been sold by them for at least a dozen years. Here's a link to the "Material Safety Data Sheet" for Strip-X which shows its components with % by weight of each. http://www2.itap.purdue.edu/msds/docs/1451.pdf [67% methylene chloride, 17% phenol, 4% ammonia, 20% inert thickeners] -- Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Wrote:
There's a paint-and-finish stripper of a similar name (Klean-Strip Strip-X) available these days. Like the wire-"Strip-X" it contains methylene chloride, but it has no cresol or ammonia. Its other ingredients include toluene, xylene, and methanol, plus a thickener (it's relatively goopy and would probably have to be wiped off of the wire using a paper towel or Q-tip or something like that). These chemicals all come with fire- and health-hazard warnings... if you use 'em, do so with proper care and precautions! I just put a glob of solder on the soldering iron tip and dunk the enameled wire into it until the enamel melts and the solder tins the end of the wire. Been doing that for over 20 years now...seems to work A-OK. Scott N0EDV Thanks Scott - I forgot that technique - Yes it does work - sometimes when you get some age on your brain, it tends to lose some of the lesser used items. - Best 73's de Howard W3CQH Glad to help out! I have "halfzheimers"....I've only forgotten HALF of what I used to know! ![]() It's probably due to the paint stripper we've been inhaling for all those years. Out of all the possible ingredients, I'm blaming it on the thickener. -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Platt wrote:
There's a paint-and-finish stripper of a similar name (Klean-Strip Strip-X) available these days. Like the wire-"Strip-X" it contains methylene chloride, but it has no cresol or ammonia. Its other ingredients include toluene, xylene, and methanol, plus a thickener (it's relatively goopy and would probably have to be wiped off of the wire using a paper towel or Q-tip or something like that). These chemicals all come with fire- and health-hazard warnings... if you use 'em, do so with proper care and precautions! ======================================= The ( potential health)problem chemicals are the C6H6-ring hydrocarbons : toluene and xylene . In addition to breathing the vapours , skin contact with the liquid is outright dangerous Most products containing these benzene/benzol derivatives are no longer available to the public at large ,since they can cause cancer. But.......they are very effective solvents. Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
AF6AY wrote:
... The do-gooders done did too much with all those warnings and attempts to protect us all from everything. Naaa, it's the people who think they should be rewarded for stupidity and basic capitalism that took all that stuff off the market. Some idiot did something stupid with the product and decided to sue. The company looked at a long legal fight or settlement and settled. They looked at a couple settlements and decided it would be more profitable to eliminate the product and concentrate on other things as they're not in the business to keep consumers satisfied, just get their money and keep as much of it as possible. - W8LNA |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 28, 8:03*am, gwatts wrote:
AF6AY wrote: ... The do-gooders done did too much with all those warnings and attempts to protect us all from everything. If a product is dangerous, why shouldn't it have warnings? Particularly when there are known carcinogens and other health hazards involved? It's not being a "do-gooder" or "doing too much" to discover hazards and eliminate or contain them. Sure, not everyone who uses Strip-X will get cancer. But some of the components of it are known carcinogens, and a proven hazard. More important, we can't know ahead of time who the susceptible folks are. Naaa, it's the people who think they should be rewarded for stupidity and basic capitalism that took all that stuff off the market. *Some idiot did something stupid with the product and decided to sue. *The company looked at a long legal fight or settlement and settled. Maybe. But I doubt it. More likely, they looked at the *possibility* of such a lawsuit, the scientific evidence of the hazards of the ingredients, the limited profit and declining sales, and just stopped making the product. Once a chemical is shown to be dangerous, the manufacturers can't claim ignorance anymore. They...decided it would be more profitable to eliminate the product and concentrate on other things as they're not in the business to keep consumers satisfied, just get their money and keep as much of it as possible. Profitability is what "capitalism" and "business" are all about. Without profitability, a capitalist company just disappears. Since the formula for Strip-X appears to be in the public domain, anybody can make it and sell it. Would *you* be willing to set up shop to make it and sell it, with all the risks that entails, and the very limited market for it? 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 26, 12:43*pm, "W3CQH" wrote:
Does anybody have the name of the substance that was sold years ago for removing the enamel coating from wires, or maybe the name of something new? You would soak the wire in it and it would soften the coating and then you just wiped the goop off the wire. 73's I've always burned off the insulation with a lighter, removed the remaining ash with a couple swipes of very fine sandpaper, and tinned. Never had a problem yet. Mike |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If a product is dangerous, why shouldn't it have warnings?
Sure, not everyone who uses Strip-X will get cancer. But some of the components of it are known carcinogens, and a proven hazard. More important, we can't know ahead of time who the susceptible folks are. Naaa, it's the people who think they should be rewarded for stupidity and basic capitalism that took all that stuff off the market. Some idiot did something stupid with the product and decided to sue. The company looked at a long legal fight or settlement and settled. Maybe. But I doubt it. More likely, they looked at the *possibility* of such a lawsuit, the scientific evidence of the hazards of the ingredients, the limited profit and declining sales, and just stopped making the product. Once a chemical is shown to be dangerous, the manufacturers can't claim ignorance anymore. =================================== And (quite rightly)the FDA , EPA and other relevant agencies at Federal and State level will be taking action . In Europe action against dangerous substances is nowadays increasingly taken through legislation by the European Parliament. I welcome that Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 28 May 2008 14:18:47 -0700 (PDT) Mike Silva
wrote: On May 26, 12:43*pm, "W3CQH" wrote: Does anybody have the name of the substance that was sold years ago for removing the enamel coating from wires, or maybe the name of something new? You would soak the wire in it and it would soften the coating and then you just wiped the goop off the wire. I've always burned off the insulation with a lighter, removed the remaining ash with a couple swipes of very fine sandpaper, and tinned. Never had a problem yet. That's what I've always done, too, but the last time I suggested it, all I heard were lots of complaints about how much easier it was to spend a lot of time breathing odd fumes. Yes, there certainly was a commercial product once sold for this purpose, but I suspect the only reason it was out there was because they knew they couldn't make much money selling "Wire Stripper Kits" that consisted of a book of matches. ;-) - ----------------------------------------------- Jim Adney Madison, WI 53711 USA ----------------------------------------------- |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott wrote:
I just put a glob of solder on the soldering iron tip and dunk the enameled wire into it until the enamel melts and the solder tins the end of the wire. Been doing that for over 20 years now.... Really Scott, if it hasn't tinned after 20 years, it probably isn't going to... hehe, sorry, couldn't help myself! ;^) - 73 de Mike N3LI - |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Removing PRO III Main tuning knob? | Equipment | |||
'Stripping' Enamel Wire. | Homebrew | |||
Toroids coating | Homebrew | |||
Need Help on Removing Viking 500 Front Panel | Boatanchors | |||
removing spanner nut | Scanner |