Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am looking for some Heterodyne conversion crystals for a receiver I am
making. The frequencies a 5 MHz, 7 MHz, 10.5 MHz, 13.5 MHz, 17.5 MHz and 21.5 MHz. The variable mixing frequency will be from 3 to 3.5 MHz. I would prefer all the same type holder. TNX de Gary, KF9CM |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey Gary,
Rocks aren't cheap he http://www.icmfg.com/thruhole_crystals.html Maybe in 9 land they pave the streets with gold. Personally I'd go with a programmable divider or PLL. Maybe you like retro, then I'd get some old rocks the ones you can take apart and grind them down to git's the freq's you need. I recall grinding some of these to get them into the novice band back 40 yrs ago. And putting a pencil mark on the quartz to get them to go down in frequency. FT243 style can be found here maybe still: http://www.af4k.com/crystals.htm 73 OM n8zu On Sep 2, 4:12 pm, Gary@ removenospamandputkf9cm.com wrote: I am looking for some Heterodyne conversion crystals for a receiver I am making. The frequencies a 5 MHz, 7 MHz, 10.5 MHz, 13.5 MHz, 17.5 MHz and 21.5 MHz. The variable mixing frequency will be from 3 to 3.5 MHz. I would prefer all the same type holder. TNX de Gary, KF9CM |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2 Sep, 21:12, Gary@ removenospamandputkf9cm.com wrote:
I am looking for some Heterodyne conversion crystals for a receiver I am making. The frequencies a 5 MHz, 7 MHz, 10.5 MHz, 13.5 MHz, *17.5 MHz and 21..5 MHz. The variable mixing frequency will be from 3 to 3.5 MHz. I would prefer all the same type holder. TNX de Gary, KF9CM The Si570 will generate those frequencies, apart from the 5 MHz. Leon |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, raypsi wrote:
Hey Gary, Rocks aren't cheap he http://www.icmfg.com/thruhole_crystals.html Maybe in 9 land they pave the streets with gold. Personally I'd go with a programmable divider or PLL. Maybe you like retro, then I'd get some old rocks the ones you can take apart and grind them down to git's the freq's you need. And you can't grind them unless they are quite close to the desired frequency. Grinding by hand will be too uneven, so the crystal will stop working if you try to grind it more than a tiny bit. It also relies on a big stock of crystals spread around so you can find one sufficiently close enough, something that did seem possible in the years after WWII, but after all this time attrition may have reduced the stock considerably. And realistically, they also have to be bulky FT-243 holders, since those you can open by removing screws, and the blank is held in place with pressure. More recent holder types require desoldering the case, and figuring out how to remove the blank and then get it back in place when it's soldered in place (or something like that I can't remember how the blank is connected). One of the odd things is that if one has to buy new crystals, a synthesizer will likely be far cheaper. In the early seventies, synthesizers made a big splash because everyone wanted lots of channels on 2m FM, and the need to have them ground to frequency (and to equipment) made it all very costly, so synthesizers despite their cost and bulk became the norm. Almost forty years later, a synthesizer for a handful of crystals would still be comparatively bulky, but would be even cheaper than in the early seventies. Michael VE2BVW |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Leon wrote:
On 2 Sep, 21:12, Gary@ removenospamandputkf9cm.com wrote: I am looking for some Heterodyne conversion crystals for a receiver I am making. The frequencies a 5 MHz, 7 MHz, 10.5 MHz, 13.5 MHz, *17.5 MHz and 21.5 MHz. The variable mixing frequency will be from 3 to 3.5 MHz. I would prefer all the same type holder. TNX de Gary, KF9CM The Si570 will generate those frequencies, apart from the 5 MHz. Leon Of course, 5MHz is the one in the bunch that is bound to be easy to get (and if it's not, 10MHz makes it almost as easy) and would provide the clock for the synthezier if it needs an external one. Michael VE2BVW |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 14:54:17 -0400, Michael Black wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, raypsi wrote: Hey Gary, Rocks aren't cheap he http://www.icmfg.com/thruhole_crystals.html Maybe in 9 land they pave the streets with gold. Personally I'd go with a programmable divider or PLL. Maybe you like retro, then I'd get some old rocks the ones you can take apart and grind them down to git's the freq's you need. And you can't grind them unless they are quite close to the desired frequency. Grinding by hand will be too uneven, so the crystal will stop working if you try to grind it more than a tiny bit. My personal experience is an FT-243 crystal's frequency can be increased by several hundred kilohertz through grinding. A more abrasive media is needed for the slurry than scouring powder can provide. Permatex 34A valve grinding compound works FB. Most of my 80M rocks (26 between 3.5 & 3.6 MHz) were originally cut for 3237 kHz. Many of my 40M crystals were moved several hundred kHz as well. The key to grinding is not to try doing too much at once. Let the abrasive do the cutting, no downward pressure is need from the fingers.. It also relies on a big stock of crystals spread around so you can find one sufficiently close enough, something that did seem possible in the years after WWII, but after all this time attrition may have reduced the stock considerably. There are still a lot of them out there and they can be most inexpensive if the actual frequency isn't too important. 73 de n4jvp |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Registered User
writes On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 14:54:17 -0400, Michael Black wrote: On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, raypsi wrote: Hey Gary, Rocks aren't cheap he http://www.icmfg.com/thruhole_crystals.html Maybe in 9 land they pave the streets with gold. Personally I'd go with a programmable divider or PLL. Maybe you like retro, then I'd get some old rocks the ones you can take apart and grind them down to git's the freq's you need. And you can't grind them unless they are quite close to the desired frequency. Grinding by hand will be too uneven, so the crystal will stop working if you try to grind it more than a tiny bit. My personal experience is an FT-243 crystal's frequency can be increased by several hundred kilohertz through grinding. A more abrasive media is needed for the slurry than scouring powder can provide. Permatex 34A valve grinding compound works FB. Most of my 80M rocks (26 between 3.5 & 3.6 MHz) were originally cut for 3237 kHz. Many of my 40M crystals were moved several hundred kHz as well. The key to grinding is not to try doing too much at once. Let the abrasive do the cutting, no downward pressure is need from the fingers.. It also relies on a big stock of crystals spread around so you can find one sufficiently close enough, something that did seem possible in the years after WWII, but after all this time attrition may have reduced the stock considerably. There are still a lot of them out there and they can be most inexpensive if the actual frequency isn't too important. 73 de n4jvp All this discussion about crystal grinding is very interesting. From my far distant experiences, it is indeed a work of art and, more often, an act of God. If the OP goes down that route, he may never actually get his receiver built! Looking at the websites of various manufacturers/suppliers (Google on "crystal+frequency" and similar), it looks like you should be able to get custom-made crystals in the required frequency range for less than $20 each. I'm sure that at least the 5MHz will be available off-the-shelf for less than $5 so we're talking maybe $100 for the six crystals. The alternative is, as has been suggested, a frequency synthesizer. There are countless circuits available, but care should be taken to use one where the spectral purity of the output signal is adequate for use in a communications receiver. In particular, the phase noise has to be low. One approach would to be look for a kit with a good spec (and obviously something as simple as possible). A Google on "frequency+synthesizer+kit" and similar brings up lots of information. -- Ian |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , Registered User writes On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 14:54:17 -0400, Michael Black wrote: On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, raypsi wrote: Hey Gary, Rocks aren't cheap he http://www.icmfg.com/thruhole_crystals.html Maybe in 9 land they pave the streets with gold. Personally I'd go with a programmable divider or PLL. Maybe you like retro, then I'd get some old rocks the ones you can take apart and grind them down to git's the freq's you need. And you can't grind them unless they are quite close to the desired frequency. Grinding by hand will be too uneven, so the crystal will stop working if you try to grind it more than a tiny bit. My personal experience is an FT-243 crystal's frequency can be increased by several hundred kilohertz through grinding. A more abrasive media is needed for the slurry than scouring powder can provide. Permatex 34A valve grinding compound works FB. Most of my 80M rocks (26 between 3.5 & 3.6 MHz) were originally cut for 3237 kHz. Many of my 40M crystals were moved several hundred kHz as well. The key to grinding is not to try doing too much at once. Let the abrasive do the cutting, no downward pressure is need from the fingers.. It also relies on a big stock of crystals spread around so you can find one sufficiently close enough, something that did seem possible in the years after WWII, but after all this time attrition may have reduced the stock considerably. There are still a lot of them out there and they can be most inexpensive if the actual frequency isn't too important. 73 de n4jvp All this discussion about crystal grinding is very interesting. From my far distant experiences, it is indeed a work of art and, more often, an act of God. If the OP goes down that route, he may never actually get his receiver built! Looking at the websites of various manufacturers/suppliers (Google on "crystal+frequency" and similar), it looks like you should be able to get custom-made crystals in the required frequency range for less than $20 each. I'm sure that at least the 5MHz will be available off-the-shelf for less than $5 so we're talking maybe $100 for the six crystals. The alternative is, as has been suggested, a frequency synthesizer. There are countless circuits available, but care should be taken to use one where the spectral purity of the output signal is adequate for use in a communications receiver. In particular, the phase noise has to be low. One approach would to be look for a kit with a good spec (and obviously something as simple as possible). A Google on "frequency+synthesizer+kit" and similar brings up lots of information. A hundred dollars can be quite a bit, likely the rest of the parts aren't that much (unless someone is buying all new parts). The thing about a synthesizer is that the original poster only needs well spaced frequencies, so the reference frequency can be 500KHz, which allows for much easier filtering than narrower channels (or, the early synthesizers in the seventies that replaced 8MHz crystals in 2M FM rigs, not only did they have to deal with close together channel spacing of 10 or 15KHz, but since the synthesizer output would be multiplied up by the transmitter, the reference frequency was the channel spacing divided by how much the transmitter multiplied, which gave a terribly low reference frequency. Plus, these are for changing bands, not tuning a given band. A second or so of lockup time isn't a problem since changing bands won't happen often. So the filtering can be better without impacting on tuning. A main tuning synthesizer with 1KHz steps starts out more complicated because it's 1KHz steps, but then it has to change frequency rapidly, which makes it even more trouble to design well. Michael VE2BVW |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What ever happened to that neat list of surplus crystals that JAN
in Fort Myers used to offer? Those were the good old days. A few of those crystals are available on the Surplus Sales of Nebraska website. I find two rocks I needed (1.515 kHz for 2nd conversion from 1.6 MHz to 85 kHz) there after searching for several weeks. Pete |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tio Pedro" wrote in message . I find two rocks I needed I found two rocks...( Edit..) ![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ringing Heterodyne Sound on 9765 kHz @ 8:20 UTC | Shortwave | |||
Slightly OT -- Why do heterodyne cause an eerie emotional feeling | Shortwave | |||
Heterodyne Mixer for FFT Spectrum Analyzer | Homebrew | |||
What is a heterodyne..... | Shortwave | |||
heterodyne 455 spurious signal on AM | Shortwave |