Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kendal Goodson wrote:
I've located the problem. I thought it would be something pretty subtle and it turned out to be just that. One of the pins on the SA612 did not go into the socket properly. It bent under and was just almost touching the socket contact. I guess it was capacitively coupling to the VFO output instead of getting a good feed. I've straightened it and I'm up and running. Thanks for all of the suggestions. 72, Kenn KA5KXW Ah, good detective work. I would have never seen that coming! -Bill |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 18, 5:21*pm, Kendal Goodson wrote:
On Nov 18, 1:19*pm, exray wrote: Kendal Goodson wrote: Thanks Grumpy. *I'll check supply voltage next. It's not a thermal problem. *The output is nice and stable until key down when it pulls. It's also frequency stable during keydown, just on a different frequency. *The oscillator isn't keyed, so I don't think it's an oscillator startup issue. 73, Kenn I'm missing something. *You said that the 'driver' etc were disconnected and the osc is not being keyed. So what is actually being keyed? -Bill I see I've done a poor job of writing up the problem statement. *The VFO at ~3.050 feeds a SA612 whose internal oscillator runs at 4.0 Mhz and mixes the two to come up with ~7.050Mhz. *Output from the mixer goes through a tuned bandpass filter to a class A driver and then to a class C final. *When I found I had a problem with the VFO staying on frequency during transmit, I disconnected the driver stage and replaced it with a resistor termination. *The problem stayed consistent. *The SA612 and the buffer/driver stage are both keyed. Ahah! The SA612's input impedance will change by a lot when it is keyed up vs keyed down. Two ways to get around this: 1. Additional buffering between the VFO and SA612 2. Swamp the impedance change from power up to power down by adding some parallel resistance. Should be DC-isolated from the SA612's input because otherwise you will upset the balance. Solution #1 requires some additional parts and current drain. I really like the two-transistor W7EL buffer. Solution #2 is just a capacitor and a resistor, but also assumes that the VFO has enough drive that it won't object to being swamped. Tim N3QE |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 18, 5:21*pm, Kendal Goodson wrote:
On Nov 18, 1:19*pm, exray wrote: Kendal Goodson wrote: Thanks Grumpy. *I'll check supply voltage next. It's not a thermal problem. *The output is nice and stable until key down when it pulls. It's also frequency stable during keydown, just on a different frequency. *The oscillator isn't keyed, so I don't think it's an oscillator startup issue. 73, Kenn I'm missing something. *You said that the 'driver' etc were disconnected and the osc is not being keyed. So what is actually being keyed? -Bill I see I've done a poor job of writing up the problem statement. *The VFO at ~3.050 feeds a SA612 whose internal oscillator runs at 4.0 Mhz and mixes the two to come up with ~7.050Mhz. *Output from the mixer goes through a tuned bandpass filter to a class A driver and then to a class C final. *When I found I had a problem with the VFO staying on frequency during transmit, I disconnected the driver stage and replaced it with a resistor termination. *The problem stayed consistent. *The SA612 and the buffer/driver stage are both keyed. -Kenn- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Are you sure its the VFO and not the SA612? Jimmie |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim Shoppa wrote:
On Nov 18, 5:21 pm, Kendal Goodson wrote: On Nov 18, 1:19 pm, exray wrote: Kendal Goodson wrote: Thanks Grumpy. I'll check supply voltage next. It's not a thermal problem. The output is nice and stable until key down when it pulls. It's also frequency stable during keydown, just on a different frequency. The oscillator isn't keyed, so I don't think it's an oscillator startup issue. 73, Kenn I'm missing something. You said that the 'driver' etc were disconnected and the osc is not being keyed. So what is actually being keyed? -Bill I see I've done a poor job of writing up the problem statement. The VFO at ~3.050 feeds a SA612 whose internal oscillator runs at 4.0 Mhz and mixes the two to come up with ~7.050Mhz. Output from the mixer goes through a tuned bandpass filter to a class A driver and then to a class C final. When I found I had a problem with the VFO staying on frequency during transmit, I disconnected the driver stage and replaced it with a resistor termination. The problem stayed consistent. The SA612 and the buffer/driver stage are both keyed. Ahah! The SA612's input impedance will change by a lot when it is keyed up vs keyed down. Two ways to get around this: 1. Additional buffering between the VFO and SA612 2. Swamp the impedance change from power up to power down by adding some parallel resistance. Should be DC-isolated from the SA612's input because otherwise you will upset the balance. Solution #1 requires some additional parts and current drain. I really like the two-transistor W7EL buffer. Solution #2 is just a capacitor and a resistor, but also assumes that the VFO has enough drive that it won't object to being swamped. Tim N3QE That sounds like it's the problem, and those are the solutions I'd suggest -- Tim just got there first. Do check the supply voltages to the VFO while you're at it, though -- changing VFO (and buffer stage) supply voltages will also pull the VFO frequency. -- Tim Wescott Wescott Design Services http://www.wescottdesign.com Do you need to implement control loops in software? "Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" gives you just what it says. See details at http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Pulling Cable in Conduit | Antenna | |||
Pulling crystal | Homebrew | |||
oscillator problem: pulling crystal abt 500 Hz in LT2S SSB Electronics -transverter | Equipment | |||
vlf transmit antenna question | Homebrew | |||
Elite Bankers Now Pulling Plug On US Economy & Currency! | Shortwave |