Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim Shoppa wrote:
In 1930's QST's it's not too uncommon to see neophytes warned that crystals will often oscillate on something other than their marked frequency. They didn't call this overtone operation, though. They /might/ be suggesting that frequency can change with loading. I find that some of the reference crystals I use are quite some way off their marked frequency when given capacitive loading that differs from that recommended by the manufacturers! BC-604's (WWII era) start with a ridiculously low crystal (400ish kHz) frequency and multiply up but I think the reason for this is more to do with FM deviation than anything else. ("Armstrong method"?) For many decades, broadcast FM stations similarly started with low crystal frequencies and multiplied up. Some of the broadcast transmitters I worked on 25 years ago used this method for FM, and were /really/ difficult to line up! They also included complex circuitry for the required "pre-distortion" of the audio to compensate for the non-linear deviation you got out of a crystal oscillators. Some manufacturers tried to overcome the distortion issue by using phase modulation and the "right" audio curves, but these required even more stages of multiplication! One of my earliest jobs as a broadcast transmitter engineer was to develop a PLL to replace the horrible multiplier chains in some of these transmitters. I used (normally) either half or quarter frequency generation, and used the last one or two multiplier stages. The CMOS PLL circuitry could be prone to bizarre effects with high field strengths, so they were built in sealed diecast boxes, and the lower frequency generation meant that the high power output stages were unlikely to couple back into the oscillator! Bob |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 22, 8:43*pm, Stray Dog wrote:
Despite what at least one other person responding to this said, I can rest assure you that if you run a doubler/multiplier stage even in a linear mode, AND if you tune the output of that stage to the multiple harmonic, you will definitely get output at that harmonic frequency which is stronger than the input drive voltage. Huh? No way... you MUST have non-linearities to make a doubler. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, Telstar Electronics wrote: Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 08:20:56 -0800 (PST) From: Telstar Electronics Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Subject: Doubling On Nov 22, 8:43*pm, Stray Dog wrote: Despite what at least one other person responding to this said, I can rest assure you that if you run a doubler/multiplier stage even in a linear mode, AND if you tune the output of that stage to the multiple harmonic, you will definitely get output at that harmonic frequency which is stronger than the input drive voltage. Huh? No way... you MUST have non-linearities to make a doubler. All tubes (and transistors, etc) have non-linearities (if the transfer characteristics are non-straight lines) if that is what you are talking about. However, I have observed output on a scope of second harmonics (and, yes, the time base was set right and auto-self triggering) and the amplifier was running no higher than Class B. You should actually try this yourself and see for yourself. Tune the output to the second harmonic and you will see grow out of the vally new "peaks" corresponding to that second harmonic. I don't know what the solid state gear is doing, but from many schematics of the vintage tube gear I'm familiar with show, and measure, biasing for linear operation, even in stages meant to multiply frequency. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message ...
On Nov 22, 8:43 pm, Stray Dog wrote: ? Despite what at least one other person responding to this said, I can rest assure you that if you run a doubler/multiplier stage even in a linear mode, AND if you tune the output of that stage to the multiple harmonic, you will definitely get output at that harmonic frequency which is stronger than the input drive voltage. Huh? No way... you MUST have non-linearities to make a doubler. Actually you do not need any nonlinearity to make a doubler (quadrupler, etc.). Assume you have two Class B (or AB) stages that are driven in push-pull. The outputs are connected in parallel. And to make things even more linear, let each stage have a resistive load. Each stage will produce a linearly amplified (but inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE POSITIVE HALF of the driving waveform only. Being driven 180 degrees out of phase with the input signal, the second stage will produce a linearly amplified but (again inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE NEGATIVE HALF of the driving waveform. Both outputs will have a DC offset of the plate (collector, drain) voltage. The resultant waveform with the outputs in parallel will look like much like a full wave rectified version of the input signal subtracted from the plate voltage. To express this mathematically, let the input signal be expressed as: Vin = A sin(wt) Now let the voltage gain of each stage be "-k" and the plate voltage be "B". The resultant waveform of the two stages connected in parallel will be: Vout = B - abs[A*k sin(wt)] where "abs" is the absolute value Vout = B - A*k sin(wt) for 0 wt Pi and = B + A*k sin(wt) for Pi wt 2Pi or alternately for -Pi wt 0 We can then calculate the Fourier series of this waveform to determine its spectrum. I will not present the calculations here as it is too difficult to show the integration over defined integrals using only plain text (and I doubt many readers will have math fonts anyway). If you wish to see the math for the Fourier series for a number of functions, read: http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~agp/calc3/notes2.pdf or http://www.physics.hku.hk/~phys2325/notes/chap7.doc. Vout = B - 2*A*K/Pi * [1 - SUMMATION {2*cos(nwt)/(n*n - 1)] for n=2, 4, 6, 8... Note that the original frequency has been eliminated and that only even order harmonics are present, and that the amplitudes drop off quite rapidly. For example, the fourth harmonic will be one fifth of the second harmonic. For those that need a simplified explanation of Fourier series, Don Lancaster wrote a good article that can be found at: http://www.tinaja.com/glib/muse90.pdf. I always thought Don had a ham license but I could not find one. In a real implementation of this multiplier, a tuned circuit would be used as the plate load. The Q of this tuned circuit will assure that only the second harmonic is present in the output. The two stages would need to be well balanced if cancellation of odd harmonics and the fundamental is required. 73, Dr. Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ POSTSCRIPT: Now let me describe how it is possible to produce ONLY the second harmonic. Instead of using two Class B or AB stages, it is possible to use triodes operating where their plate current is proportional to the square of the grid voltage. Driving the two such stages in push-pull with the outputs in parallel with a resistive load, the output waveform will be: Vout = B - A*A*k sin(wt)*sin(wt) Using a trigonometric identity {see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_trigonometric_identities}, sin(x)*sin(x) = sin(x)^2 = 0.5[1-cos(2x)] thus Vout = B - A*A*K/2 + A*A*k/2 cos(2wt) This shows that only the second harmonic is found at the output. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NoSPAM wrote:
"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message ... On Nov 22, 8:43 pm, Stray Dog wrote: ? Despite what at least one other person responding to this said, I can rest assure you that if you run a doubler/multiplier stage even in a linear mode, AND if you tune the output of that stage to the multiple harmonic, you will definitely get output at that harmonic frequency which is stronger than the input drive voltage. Huh? No way... you MUST have non-linearities to make a doubler. Actually you do not need any nonlinearity to make a doubler (quadrupler, etc.). Assume you have two Class B (or AB) stages that are driven in push-pull. The outputs are connected in parallel. And to make things even more linear, let each stage have a resistive load. Each stage will produce a linearly amplified (but inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE POSITIVE HALF of the driving waveform only. Being driven 180 degrees out of phase with the input signal, the second stage will produce a linearly amplified but (again inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE NEGATIVE HALF of the driving waveform. Both outputs will have a DC offset of the plate (collector, drain) voltage. Class B or even Class AB in the circuit you described are non-linear. Try that circuit with Class A biasing. Bill K7NOM The resultant waveform with the outputs in parallel will look like much like a full wave rectified version of the input signal subtracted from the plate voltage. To express this mathematically, let the input signal be expressed as: Vin = A sin(wt) Now let the voltage gain of each stage be "-k" and the plate voltage be "B". The resultant waveform of the two stages connected in parallel will be: Vout = B - abs[A*k sin(wt)] where "abs" is the absolute value Vout = B - A*k sin(wt) for 0 wt Pi and = B + A*k sin(wt) for Pi wt 2Pi or alternately for -Pi wt 0 We can then calculate the Fourier series of this waveform to determine its spectrum. I will not present the calculations here as it is too difficult to show the integration over defined integrals using only plain text (and I doubt many readers will have math fonts anyway). If you wish to see the math for the Fourier series for a number of functions, read: http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~agp/calc3/notes2.pdf http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/%7Eagp/calc3/notes2.pdfhttp://www.physics.hku.hk/%7Ephys2325/notes/chap7.doc or _http://www.physics.hku.hk/~phys2325/notes/chap7.doc http://www.physics.hku.hk/%7Ephys2325/notes/chap7.doc._ Vout = B - 2*A*K/Pi * [1 - SUMMATION {2*cos(nwt)/(n*n - 1)] for n=2, 4, 6, 8... Note that the original frequency has been eliminated and that only even order harmonics are present, and that the amplitudes drop off quite rapidly. For example, the fourth harmonic will be one fifth of the second harmonic. For those that need a simplified explanation of Fourier series, Don Lancaster wrote a good article that can be found at: http://www.tinaja.com/glib/muse90.pdf. I always thought Don had a ham license but I could not find one. In a real implementation of this multiplier, a tuned circuit would be used as the plate load. The Q of this tuned circuit will assure that only the second harmonic is present in the output. The two stages would need to be well balanced if cancellation of odd harmonics and the fundamental is required. 73, Dr. Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ POSTSCRIPT: Now let me describe how it is possible to produce ONLY the second harmonic. Instead of using two Class B or AB stages, it is possible to use triodes operating where their plate current is proportional to the square of the grid voltage. Driving the two such stages in push-pull with the outputs in parallel with a resistive load, the output waveform will be: Vout = B - A*A*k sin(wt)*sin(wt) Using a trigonometric identity {see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_trigonometric_identities}, sin(x)*sin(x) = sin(x)^2 = 0.5[1-cos(2x)] thus Vout = B - A*A*K/2 + A*A*k/2 cos(2wt) This shows that only the second harmonic is found at the output. |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill Janssen" wrote in message
... NoSPAM wrote: "Telstar Electronics" wrote in message ... On Nov 22, 8:43 pm, Stray Dog wrote: ? Despite what at least one other person responding to this said, I can rest assure you that if you run a doubler/multiplier stage even in a linear mode, AND if you tune the output of that stage to the multiple harmonic, you will definitely get output at that harmonic frequency which is stronger than the input drive voltage. Huh? No way... you MUST have non-linearities to make a doubler. Actually you do not need any nonlinearity to make a doubler (quadrupler, etc.). Assume you have two Class B (or AB) stages that are driven in push-pull. The outputs are connected in parallel. And to make things even more linear, let each stage have a resistive load. Each stage will produce a linearly amplified (but inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE POSITIVE HALF of the driving waveform only. Being driven 180 degrees out of phase with the input signal, the second stage will produce a linearly amplified but (again inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE NEGATIVE HALF of the driving waveform. Both outputs will have a DC offset of the plate (collector, drain) voltage. Class B or even Class AB in the circuit you described are non-linear. Try that circuit with Class A biasing. Bill K7NOM All that is really required is that the active devices have a different gain with positive input signals than with negative input signals. This is easily achieved with Class B and Class AB stages. As long as both stages are identical the fundamental and odd order harmonics will cancel. You are correct that with two Class A stages where the gain is identical for either polarity of input, the output signal will perfectly cancel. To make the method work here, you could synchronously switch the input signal between two perfectly linear stages. My point was that a full-wave rectified signal contains only even order harmonics. In the real world, as Stray Dog pointed out, ALL amplifier stages are nonlinear to some degree. The reason that Class AB and B amplifiers are considered linear RF amplifiers is that the tuned circuit on the output supplies supplies the "missing half" of the waveform. Without the tuned circuit, harmonics of the 2nd, 4th, 6th, etc. order as well as the fundamental are present. Odd order harmonics are only found if the gain is nonlinear for positive input signals. The tuned output stage passes the fundamental and suppresses the harmonics. Thanks for pointing this out, Bill. 73, Barry WA4VZQ |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 14, 10:27*pm, "NoSPAM" wrote:
*Actually you do not need any nonlinearity to make a doubler (quadrupler, etc.). You mean to tell me that you take a clean sine wave... pass it through... say a single-ended class A amp... and you can put a tank on the output of that amplifier... and tune for a harmonic? You will get nothing. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, NoSPAM wrote: Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:27:11 -0500 From: NoSPAM Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Followup-To: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Subject: Doubling "Bill Janssen" wrote in message ... NoSPAM wrote: "Telstar Electronics" wrote in message ... On Nov 22, 8:43 pm, Stray Dog wrote: ? Despite what at least one other person responding to this said, I can rest assure you that if you run a doubler/multiplier stage even in a linear mode, AND if you tune the output of that stage to the multiple harmonic, you will definitely get output at that harmonic frequency which is stronger than the input drive voltage. Huh? No way... you MUST have non-linearities to make a doubler. Actually you do not need any nonlinearity to make a doubler (quadrupler, etc.). Assume you have two Class B (or AB) stages that are driven in push-pull. The outputs are connected in parallel. And to make things even more linear, let each stage have a resistive load. Each stage will produce a linearly amplified (but inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE POSITIVE HALF of the driving waveform only. Being driven 180 degrees out of phase with the input signal, the second stage will produce a linearly amplified but (again inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE NEGATIVE HALF of the driving waveform. Both outputs will have a DC offset of the plate (collector, drain) voltage. Class B or even Class AB in the circuit you described are non-linear. Try that circuit with Class A biasing. Bill K7NOM All that is really required is that the active devices have a different gain with positive input signals than with negative input signals. This is easily achieved with Class B and Class AB stages. As long as both stages are identical the fundamental and odd order harmonics will cancel. You are correct that with two Class A stages where the gain is identical for either polarity of input, the output signal will perfectly cancel. To make the method work here, you could synchronously switch the input signal between two perfectly linear stages. My point was that a full-wave rectified signal contains only even order harmonics. In the real world, as Stray Dog pointed out, ALL amplifier stages are nonlinear to some degree. The reason that Class AB and B amplifiers are considered linear RF amplifiers is that the tuned circuit on the output supplies supplies the "missing half" of the waveform. Without the tuned circuit, harmonics of the 2nd, 4th, 6th, etc. order as well as the fundamental are present. Odd order harmonics are only found if the gain is nonlinear for positive input signals. The tuned output stage passes the fundamental and suppresses the harmonics. Thanks for pointing this out, Bill. 73, Barry WA4VZQ I'll just add a footnote. When I actually built a few "buffer" amplifiers (tube jobs, 12BY7s, 6AG7s, etc), and for the hell of it, hooked up my scope (an old Tektronix solid state scope with one microsecond/div timebase, max) and actually looked at the sine wave (it looked 'nice' by the way) and then tuned the air variable through both the fundamental or the second harmonic (and I'm talking about 2-3 mHz signal source), I was amazed to be able to easily see the extra "peaks" come out of the "valleys" of the fundamental and I'm running these tubes at zero bias, low plate voltage, too. Look in the tube manuals for any class C tube and they talk about -50 to -70 v, grid negative wrt cathode. Class B and below talk about negative bias much lower but still pretty negative. Like I said, I was surprised. This _should_ be discussed in the ARRL handbooks (maybe it is, but I couldn't find it [maybe I didn't look hard enough?]) and it would be worth 1-2 pages to show everyone what these signals have in them. Here is another goodie (true story). R-390 local oscillator (runs 2.4 to 3.4 mHz, single 6BA6 tube). Had it set to about 3 mHz and looking at that "nice" (I have no harmonic meter to measure distortion) sine wave on the scope, and I "loaded down" the oscillator output lead with a tuned circuit and tuned that circuit to about 6 mHz. Guess what? Got double the number of peaks on the scope, just as with the linear amplifier. All calculate out on peaks vs time base divisions. So? Does anyone want to suggest that having the output LC circuit of an LC free-running oscillator tuned to double the frequency of the LC circuit is making it "oscillate" on its second overtone? ;-) Yeah, I checked resonant frequencies with a GDO on all this stuff, too. I'm not making any of this up. For the record, I also have an old Knight Kit RF oscillator (100Kc to 400 mHz on 3rd harmonic) and put that into my scope and the waveform looks like crap (but you can pick up the signal on a SW receiver set to where the scale matches the frequency of the oscillator). And, the shape of the crap changes from one end of the band to the other. Also have an old HP audio oscillator (high quality stuff) and it puts out a _very_ 'nice' sine wave no matter where in the range you set the dial (one Hz to 200 kHz). 73 all, |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message
... You mean to tell me that you take a clean sine wave... pass it through... say a single-ended class A amp... and you can put a tank on the output of that amplifier... and tune for a harmonic? You will get nothing. Class A means that plate current is flowing throughout the entire cycle of the input wave with the tube operated between cutoff and saturation. It says nothing about the linearity of the tube's transconductance (plate current as a function of grid voltage). With real devices, the transconductance curve is ALWAYS nonlinear to some degree, producing distortion (and harmonics). As you decrease the drive to a single-ended Class A amplifier, you are working on a smaller and smaller portion portion of the transconductance curve which decreases distortion. In the limit where only an infinitesimal part of the transconductance curve is used, you will get no distortion and no harmonics. Of course, in this situation the tube produces NO output.while drawing current from the power supply. The scheme that I was talking about, known as a push-push doubler, generally uses the tubes operated in Class B although AB operation will work too, but it produces less harmonics. The real advantage of a push-push doubler is that odd order harmonics and the fundamental cancel out, making the resultant waveform easier to filter. 73, Barry WA4VZQ |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Telstar Electronics wrote: Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:16:29 -0800 (PST) From: Telstar Electronics Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Subject: Doubling On Dec 14, 10:27*pm, "NoSPAM" wrote: *Actually you do not need any nonlinearity to make a doubler (quadrupler, etc.). You mean to tell me that you take a clean sine wave... You might want to consider qualifying your thinking on this by setting a specification for harmonic distortion (in other words, you might need to consider how much of that "clean sine wave" signal has other components in it, including non-harmonic componentes) pass it through... say a single-ended class A amp... You might also want to consider, here, too, how much harmonic distortion THAT class A amplifier also causes which makes a contribution to the output. and you can put a tank on the output of that amplifier... and tune for a harmonic? You will get nothing. You might even more also want to consider that any tuned circuit will pass energy not at the resonance of that tuned circuit. You would probably contribute to your own enlightenment if you actually did some real experiments on this. It does not take long to do. Back when I was an undergraduate student with major in physics (BS, 1966), I worked in a Mossbauer Effect spectrometer lab and we built most of our equipment (dual delay line pulse amplifiers, regulated DC power supplies, repairing survey meters, etc) my boss had me build a waveform converter that used a network of resistors and diodss to convert a sawtooth waveform to sine wave and he was doing this because the book he got the circuit from said that there would be less than 1% harmonic distortion and he was interested in that specification for the spectrometer drives and all of our commercial high quality signal generators were worse in that specification, particulary at the very low frequencies we ran the drives at (less than one cycle per second). So, you have to define what you mean by "clean sine wave." But, I'll also say that, no, you will not get nothing if you tune to the second harmonic and have a linear amplifier (unless, maybe, you have a _perfect_ sine wave and a _perfect_ linear amplifier [the rest of you guys might want to comment on this yeah, I know about Fourier analysis, too]). |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Doubling car mileage secret!!! | CB | |||
Doubling a reference frequency | Homebrew |