Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old December 30th 08, 08:32 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 644
Default RF probe for millivolts?

On Dec 29, 9:29*pm, "Tio Pedro" wrote:
" DOH! In fact I do have access to one via a friend. Why didn't I think

of that in the first place? Too much wine and egg nog over Christmas I
guess. But also, thanks to v\everyone for all their comments - all
very useful and if the scope doesn't work for me I will try some of
the other ideas out. Cheers...


Larry VE7EA


don't forget the scope is going to give you a very high reading,
since the display is peak-to-peak. *You'll have to take the
reading from the waveform's *0 voltage cross-over
poiint to the peak of on one side of the full
waveform, and multiply by .707 to get the RMS value.

Pete


Another point about scopes and their probes: they commonly put quite
a bit of capacitance (several pF) at the point they're measuring. A
10:1 passive probe with a couple meters of cable will have several
tens of pF capacitance in the cable, and the capacitive part of the
divider at the probe body can't drop that by more than 10:1. I'm not
sure where the OP will be probing; it may be low enough frequency and
low enough impedance that it doesn't matter. But it's quite possible
for a decent diode-based RF probe to present lower capacitance than a
scope probe. Probing things without disturbing them can be very
tricky at times.

Cheers,
Tom
  #12   Report Post  
Old December 30th 08, 01:57 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2008
Posts: 37
Default RF probe for millivolts?

K7ITM wrote:
SNIP


Sensitivity for very low RF voltages is greatly enhanced by using a
high impedance meter. I would NOT put a 10k resistor to ground there
if I wanted sensitivity to low millivolt RF, since the diode average
current at low RF voltages is very low indeed. You can see that from
my reported results with the 1N4148 detector, with a 1 megohm meter
load versus with a 10 megohm meter load. With the high impedances
involved, the 100pF cap allows response down to well below what would
normally be considered RF frequencies. In the circuit described
above, the low-side 3dB corner frequency will be about that of the
100pF cap and the 10k resistor.

Cheers,
Tom


You might find this interesting:
http://www.cliftonlaboratories.com/d..._rf_probes.htm


Charlie.

--
M0WYM
www.radiowymsey.org

Sign today!
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/SaveShortwave/

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
probe feed ybjith Antenna 0 April 11th 07 07:47 AM
Pro 2006 and Probe 3 Help Tim Sprout Scanner 5 October 22nd 06 04:41 AM
Huygens Probe (Was The Cassini Probe) K4YZ Policy 4 January 29th 05 03:08 PM
The Huygens Probe (Was The Cassini Probe) Len Anderson Policy 0 January 27th 05 09:21 PM
RF probe Michael Brook Homebrew 7 July 16th 04 09:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017