Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm designing a HF transceiver and I'm going to use SA612/NE612 as a
product detector. I'm not sure what is the optimal signal level, which should be delivered to the inputs from the IF amplifier to achieve the best performance? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:01:19 -0700, Michał Słomkowski wrote:
I'm designing a HF transceiver and I'm going to use SA612/NE612 as a product detector. I'm not sure what is the optimal signal level, which should be delivered to the inputs from the IF amplifier to achieve the best performance? There are graphs for input IP3, compression and gain in the Philips data-sheet. The exact value of IP3 will depend on the supply voltage, frequency and the configuration of your circuit. The data-sheet figure for 45MHz is -13dBm. You will want the IF input to be well below this level. Somewhere in the -25 to -40dBm region should be ok. The xx612 is a low power, high gain device. It is not a particularly good choice as a product detector in a superhet. A simple two diode balanced mixer or a diode ring mixer (DBM) would give much better IMD performance and costs even less than the 612. 73, Ed. EI9GQ. -- Linux 2.6.30 Remove 'X' to reply by e-mail. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you very much for your reply. I'm going to use NE612 because
it's quite popular and easy to use. Double balanced mixers are better, but they need vary good impedance matching and high LO signal level. I don't have much experience in building RF circuits, but I think the IMD performance is not as important in product detector, as in the first mixer. My concept of the receiver stage is that: bandpass filters - variable attenuators - first mixer AD831 - quarz filter XF9/B (a polish replacement) with 9MHz IF - IF block based on variable gain amplifiers LMH6505 and preamplifier LMH6624 - product detector. I would use AD831 also as a product detector but this part is very hard to find in Poland so I only managed to get one piece. PS. I have read your webpage that helped me much in building my own transceiver! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 1, 10:01*am, Micha³ S³omkowski wrote:
I'm designing a HF transceiver and I'm going to use SA612/NE612 as a product detector. I'm not sure what is the optimal signal level, which should be delivered to the inputs from the IF amplifier to achieve the best performance? Not intended to be a high-level input device, the Gilbert Cell structure of the SA612 or SA612A should make a good, low-power SSB or CW detector. Mixer ratings put the IP3 maximum at -15 dbm which comes out to about 40 mV p-p at the input. Mixer conversion gain is somewhere in between 14 and 19 db. Both input and output impedances are 1.5 KOhms in parallel with about 2 pFd. Both inputs are DC biased internally so capacitive coupling should be used (very important so as not to disturb internal biasing). Output impedance is 1.5 KOhms from the internal collector loads, should also be capacitively-coupled to the audio output. Expect an audio output level to be about 1 V peak-to-peak maximum with an IF input of ~ 40 mV peak-to- peak. That is running from a +5 VDC supply rail. It is almost the same with a +6 VDC supply rail. Carrier re-insertion/mixing (for "product detector" use) would be about 200 to 300 mV peak-to-peak. Try not to exceed 300 mV p-p as that will cause distortion from "BFO" harmonic generation. Dropping below 200 mV p-p will cause the conversion transconductance to drop until it almost disappears. Interesting application, breaking some new territory there! :-) Basically an HF to low-UHF design, it was intended solely as a low-supply-drain (2.4 to 3.0 mA) front-end mixer, it should work equally well to "down-mix" back to audio range. Mixing is mixing, dependent only on the frequency response of the internal transistor junctions. 73, Len Anderson AF6AY |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
AF6AY wrote:
On Sep 1, 10:01 am, Micha³ S³omkowski wrote: I'm designing a HF transceiver and I'm going to use SA612/NE612 as a product detector. I'm not sure what is the optimal signal level, which should be delivered to the inputs from the IF amplifier to achieve the best performance? Not intended to be a high-level input device, the Gilbert Cell structure of the SA612 or SA612A should make a good, low-power SSB or CW detector. Mixer ratings put the IP3 maximum at -15 dbm which comes out to about 40 mV p-p at the input. Mixer conversion gain is somewhere in between 14 and 19 db. Both input and output impedances are 1.5 KOhms in parallel with about 2 pFd. Both inputs are DC biased internally so capacitive coupling should be used (very important so as not to disturb internal biasing). Output impedance is 1.5 KOhms from the internal collector loads, should also be capacitively-coupled to the audio output. Expect an audio output level to be about 1 V peak-to-peak maximum with an IF input of ~ 40 mV peak-to- peak. That is running from a +5 VDC supply rail. It is almost the same with a +6 VDC supply rail. Carrier re-insertion/mixing (for "product detector" use) would be about 200 to 300 mV peak-to-peak. Try not to exceed 300 mV p-p as that will cause distortion from "BFO" harmonic generation. Dropping below 200 mV p-p will cause the conversion transconductance to drop until it almost disappears. Interesting application, breaking some new territory there! :-) Basically an HF to low-UHF design, it was intended solely as a low-supply-drain (2.4 to 3.0 mA) front-end mixer, it should work equally well to "down-mix" back to audio range. Mixing is mixing, dependent only on the frequency response of the internal transistor junctions. 73, Len Anderson AF6AY Actually the SA602/612 (IIRC the '602 is the better part, the 612 is a fallout of 602's that didn't meet spec) can work well. The Elecraft K2 uses this chip in several places, including the product detector and the K2 has one of the best receiver spec's out there. They did make use of pads in the signal and hfo paths to get the input levels correct, and no doubt matched input and output impedances correctly as well. An inspection of the K2 schematic's would be a good lesson in setting up this part. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:01:19 -0700, Michał Słomkowski wrote:
I'm designing a HF transceiver and I'm going to use SA612/NE612 as a product detector. I'm not sure what is the optimal signal level, which should be delivered to the inputs from the IF amplifier to achieve the best performance? I did this a long time ago with an NE602, in a receiver with audio- derived AGC (see http://www.wescottdesign.com/articles/MSK/ page_79.html). With IF input levels the mixer would suffer diminishing output. This would cause the AGC to get "stuck" in a positive feedback mode and push the thing to ever-higher gain and ever-lower audio levels. I fixed it with a pair of diodes, one in each direction, at the IF input to the mixer (they're not in the schematic). They'd distort the signal at those levels, but at that point it was much higher than desired anyway -- it just needed to keep it low enough to let the AGC grab hold. I _think_ they were germanium diodes -- IIRC silicon diodes let too much signal through. You could use germanium, Schottky, or plain old silicon diodes plus a 6dB pad, all to equal effect. I'd tell you how good it sounded, but it was a data-link receiver and I don't recall ever listening to it! -- www.wescottdesign.com |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I decided the IF amplifier will deliver the signal to SA612 at the
level -40dBm. Thanks everyone for advices. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Which scanners combine 900 MHz coverage with signal level meter | Scanner | |||
Optimal radiation angle. | Antenna | |||
ne612 IC working on 28mhz | Homebrew | |||
NE/SA602 VS NE/SA612 | Homebrew | |||
FA: Signal Level Meter | Swap |